ONEWEST SANCIONED FOR PRETENDING TO BE A LENDER – remember, motions to compel can go either way!

From: Charles Cox [mailto:charles@bayliving.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 6:57 AM
To: Charles Cox
Subject: ONEWEST SANCIONED FOR PRETENDING TO BE A LENDER – remember, motions to compel can go either way!

ONEWEST SPANKED FOR PRETENDING TO BE A LENDER

Posted on October 6, 2011 by Neil Garfield

(Onewest Bank Gets a Spanking)

Onewest Bank filed a motion to compel responses to Discovery against me.

Thanks to the Info on Neil’s site- I knew Onewest bank was not a real party in interest. I refused to respond to their bogus discovery.

I had to educate my Probate Attorney as to the issues.

It helped that I obtained email FOIA response from the FDIC that indicated their sale of the assests of INDYMAC bank in March 2009 did not include the “loan” that has been under litigation now for 25 months.

Instead of OWB attorneys getting their requested $2,300 in sanctions against me, as the Personal Representative of My 88 year old dads Estate- The Judge “got it” and sanction them for $750.

For the record- this California Judge relied on C.C.P 378(A) to based his decision to sanction the Onewest Bank “tall building” Attorney(s)

I hope this info will help others fighting the good fight here in California.

Stay Strong,

Steven Rosenberg

OneWest-Bank-Sanctioned-in-Probate-Case-For-Not-Being-Real-Party-In-Interest.pdf

Unknown's avatar

Author: timothymccandless

I have spent most of my professional life helping people who were being taken advantage of by systems they did not fully understand. As an attorney, I represented consumers against predatory lending practices and worked in elder law protecting seniors from fraud. My family lost $239,145 to identity theft, which became the foundation for my seniorgard.onlime and deepened my commitment to financial education. Since 2008, I have maintained a blog at timothymccandless.wordpress.com providing free financial education. Not behind a paywall. Free, because financial literacy should not cost money. I trade with real money using the exact strategy described in this book. My current positions: Pfizer at $16,480 deployed generating $77,900 per year net. Verizon at $29,260 deployed generating $51,000 per year net. Combined: 293% annualized pace. These are my only active positions. Not cherry-picked.

3 thoughts on “ONEWEST SANCIONED FOR PRETENDING TO BE A LENDER – remember, motions to compel can go either way!”

  3. So how do we do what you did, get the FDIC to email you that the loans sold to owb did not include your dad’s loan?
    I’m also stuck with owb. Maybe they don’t really have my loan either. This year, they tried to assign it from mers to indymac “bank!” via a well-known robosigner.

    Is FDIC part of the govt or the fed reserve? They respond to FOIA?

    Reply

Leave a comment