Default Judgment in Quiet Title Not Allowed

From: Charles Cox [mailto:charles@bayliving.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:05 AM
To: Charles Cox
Subject: Default Judgment in Quiet Title Not Allowed

In a quiet title action, default judgment entered against defendants is reversed where the trial court did not allow the defaulting defendants to put on evidence at a prejudgment evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of the quiet title action, as required by Code Civ. Procedure section 764.010

Cal.App.4th-Nickell v. Matlock.docx

Unknown's avatar

Author: timothymccandless

I have spent most of my professional life helping people who were being taken advantage of by systems they did not fully understand. As an attorney, I represented consumers against predatory lending practices and worked in elder law protecting seniors from fraud. My family lost $239,145 to identity theft, which became the foundation for my seniorgard.onlime and deepened my commitment to financial education. Since 2008, I have maintained a blog at timothymccandless.wordpress.com providing free financial education. Not behind a paywall. Free, because financial literacy should not cost money. I trade with real money using the exact strategy described in this book. My current positions: Pfizer at $16,480 deployed generating $77,900 per year net. Verizon at $29,260 deployed generating $51,000 per year net. Combined: 293% annualized pace. These are my only active positions. Not cherry-picked.

One thought on “Default Judgment in Quiet Title Not Allowed”

Leave a comment