From: Charles Cox [mailto:charles@bayliving.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:42 AM
To: Charles Cox
Subject: MSJ Judicial Foreclosure CCP 725(a) does not prohibit servicer from foreclosure if assigned
In a homeowner’s suit against a loan servicer for claims arising out of a nonjudicial foreclosure attempts, trial court’s grant of loan servicer’s motion for summary judgment on the judicial foreclosure cross-complaint and entry of a decree authorizing foreclosure is affirmed, as Code of Civil Procedure section 725(a) does not prohibit a loan servicer from initiating a judicial foreclosure action in its name, so long as the right to foreclose has been assigned to the loan servicer
Arabia v. BAC Cal.App.4th.docx
Author: timothymccandless
The Impact—and Your Opportunity
As Our Client left the hearing room, he knew this victory was bigger than just The Crossings. Other property owners facing similar issues could now challenge their assessments with greater confidence. The case set a precedent, demonstrating that robust, market-informed evidence could lead to fair property valuations.
It had been a battle, but he had proved that the system could be challenged—and that fairness in taxation was worth fighting for.
Could You Be Overpaying on Property Taxes?
If you own Large apartment complexes or commercial property, you may be paying far more in property taxes than you should. Just like Our Client, you have the right to challenge an unfair assessment and secure the tax savings you deserve.
At Lower Property Tax CA, we specialize in helping property owners like you reduce their tax burden. Our expert consultants and appraisal team will analyze your property’s financials, market conditions, and county assessment methodologies to build a strong case for a reduction.We recognize that every client's tax situation is unique. That's why we take the time to understand your specific needs and tailor our services accordingly. You can count on us to provide personalized attention to your tax matters.
View all posts by timothymccandless
One thought on “MSJ Judicial Foreclosure CCP 725(a) does not prohibit servicer from foreclosure if assigned”