From: Charles Cox [mailto:charles@bayliving.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:42 AM
To: Charles Cox
Subject: MSJ Judicial Foreclosure CCP 725(a) does not prohibit servicer from foreclosure if assigned
In a homeowner’s suit against a loan servicer for claims arising out of a nonjudicial foreclosure attempts, trial court’s grant of loan servicer’s motion for summary judgment on the judicial foreclosure cross-complaint and entry of a decree authorizing foreclosure is affirmed, as Code of Civil Procedure section 725(a) does not prohibit a loan servicer from initiating a judicial foreclosure action in its name, so long as the right to foreclose has been assigned to the loan servicer
Arabia v. BAC Cal.App.4th.docx
Author: timothymccandless
I have spent most of my professional life helping people who were being taken advantage of by systems they did not fully understand.
As an attorney, I represented consumers against predatory lending practices and worked in elder law protecting seniors from fraud. My family lost $239,145 to identity theft, which became the foundation for my seniorgard.onlime and deepened my commitment to financial education.
Since 2008, I have maintained a blog at timothymccandless.wordpress.com providing free financial education. Not behind a paywall. Free, because financial literacy should not cost money.
I trade with real money using the exact strategy described in this book. My current positions: Pfizer at $16,480 deployed generating $77,900 per year net. Verizon at $29,260 deployed generating $51,000 per year net. Combined: 293% annualized pace. These are my only active positions. Not cherry-picked.
View all posts by timothymccandless
One thought on “MSJ Judicial Foreclosure CCP 725(a) does not prohibit servicer from foreclosure if assigned”