Fourth Circuit Holds Inheritances Are Estate Property In Chapter 13 Cases

From: Charles Cox [mailto:charles@ldapro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:50 AM
To: Charles Cox
Subject: Fourth Circuit Holds Inheritances Are Estate Property In Chapter 13 Cases

Fourth Circuit Holds Inheritances Are Estate Property In Chapter 13 Cases

Yesterday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Carroll v Logan. This will have an impact for future chapter 13 cases in this circuit.

In Carroll, the debtors filed a chapter 13 case in 2009. The Carrolls’ plan provided for a payment to unsecured creditors of approximately 3.8%, that is, each unsecured creditor who filed a claim would receive approximately 4% of what they claimed was owed.

A little over three years after the debtors’ filed bankruptcy, Mr. Carroll notified the court that he would receive $100,000.00 from an inheritance. Upon such notice, the chapter 13 trustee moved to modify their plan to provide for the $100,000.00 to be paid through the plan toward unsecured creditors. The debtors’ objected to the trustee’s motion.

At issue were two provisions of the Bankruptcy Code: Section 541 and Section 1306. Section 541 defines what property interests come into the bankruptcy estate upon filing for bankruptcy protection. In particular, Section 541(a)(5) states that any property that the debtor acquires or is entitled to within 180 days after filing bankruptcy by bequest, devise or inheritance becomes property of the bankruptcy estate. A reason for this provision is so that if a debtor knows that a family member is going to pass on soon and the debtor has lots of debts, the debtor won’t file bankruptcy immediately before the family member passes to discharge his debts and then have the full inheritance. If a debtor inherits property within 180 days after filing, the trustee can get those assets to pay creditors.

In the Carrolls’ case, they had filed for bankruptcy in 2009 and did not become entitled to inherit anything until well after the 180 days since filing had passed. As such, the debtors’ argued, they should not have to submit their inheritance to the chapter 13 trustee.

The trustee countered and the Fourth Circuit agreed that Section 1306 allows the trustee to reach the inheritance. Section 1306 states that property of the bankruptcy estate includes, in addition to the property specified in Section 541 (see above), all property that the debtor acquires after commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under a different chapter. As such, under Section 1306, even though the debtor did not acquire the property within 180 days after his bankruptcy filing as set forth under Section 541, Section 1306 states that the after acquired property does come into the bankruptcy estate until the case is closed, dismissed or converted. Therefore, the debtors would be required to pay the $100,000.00 inheritance into the plan (less their exemptions, if any).

This can create another factor to carefully consider before choosing a chapter 7 case or a chapter 13 case. If you do not stand to inherit much from family members, it may not be much of a factor. If you do stand to inherit something, a chapter 13 case can go on for up to five years and any inheritance acquired could go to paying your creditors. At the same time, if you do not qualify for a chapter 7 case because you “flunk” the means test or if you must file a chapter 13 to cure mortgage arrears or other reasons, there may not be any other bankruptcy options.

A skilled bankruptcy professional such as those on this website can help you navigate the world of bankruptcy. If you are facing financial issues, contact one of us today.

Carroll v. Logan.pdf

Unknown's avatar

Author: timothymccandless

The Impact—and Your Opportunity As Our Client left the hearing room, he knew this victory was bigger than just The Crossings. Other property owners facing similar issues could now challenge their assessments with greater confidence. The case set a precedent, demonstrating that robust, market-informed evidence could lead to fair property valuations. It had been a battle, but he had proved that the system could be challenged—and that fairness in taxation was worth fighting for. Could You Be Overpaying on Property Taxes? If you own Large apartment complexes or commercial property, you may be paying far more in property taxes than you should. Just like Our Client, you have the right to challenge an unfair assessment and secure the tax savings you deserve. At Lower Property Tax CA, we specialize in helping property owners like you reduce their tax burden. Our expert consultants and appraisal team will analyze your property’s financials, market conditions, and county assessment methodologies to build a strong case for a reduction.We recognize that every client's tax situation is unique. That's why we take the time to understand your specific needs and tailor our services accordingly. You can count on us to provide personalized attention to your tax matters.

Leave a comment