The Upside of Global Trade Disputes: Exploring Favorable Resolutions and Potential Benefit

The current global trade war, characterized by escalating tariffs and trade tensions between major economies, presents a complex web of challenges and potential opportunities. While the immediate consequences often involve economic disruption and increased costs, this report explores the most favorable potential resolutions that could emerge from this conflict. These optimistic scenarios encompass a move towards fairer and more balanced trade relationships, a revitalization of domestic innovation and industry, the creation of more resilient global supply chains, improvements in international trade governance, and the long-term benefit of specific industries. Realizing these positive outcomes, however, hinges on critical conditions including successful diplomatic negotiations, the implementation of strategic domestic policies, a commitment to international cooperation, and the adaptability of businesses in navigating the evolving trade landscape. This analysis delves into these possibilities, drawing upon economic theory, historical precedents, and contemporary research to provide a comprehensive perspective on the potential upside of the current global trade war.

Introduction:

The global trade landscape is currently marked by significant friction, primarily stemming from a trade war involving major economic powers. This conflict is characterized by the imposition of tariffs, the erection of non-tariff barriers, and the exacerbation of existing trade imbalances between nations. While the immediate effects of this trade war have largely been viewed through a negative lens, encompassing concerns about economic slowdown, increased consumer prices, and disrupted supply chains, this report shifts focus to explore the potential for optimistic resolutions. The central premise is that the current trade disputes, while disruptive in the short term, could ultimately pave the way for a more favorable and sustainable global trade system. This analysis will investigate various scenarios where the trade war might lead to positive long-term outcomes, supported by rigorous research and drawing upon economic and policy perspectives. The report aims to not only identify these potential benefits but also to thoroughly examine the conditions under which these optimistic resolutions might be realized. By delving into economic theory, analyzing historical precedents of trade conflicts and resolutions, and considering contemporary research on the ongoing trade war, this expert-level report seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the possible silver linings that could emerge from the current global trade tensions.

The Potential for Fairer and More Balanced Trade:

A primary argument underpinning the current trade war, particularly from the perspective of the initiating nations, is the need to rectify long-standing trade imbalances that are perceived as unfair or unsustainable.¹ The White House, for instance, has declared large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits as a national emergency, asserting that these imbalances have contributed to the decline of the domestic manufacturing base and have undermined national security.² The current administration views reciprocal tariffs as a crucial instrument to address these issues, aiming for tariff equivalency with nations that impose higher duties on American products.¹ This stance suggests a potential resolution where the trade war serves as a catalyst to genuinely address these historical imbalances, ultimately leading to more equitable trade flows between nations.

The imposition or even the threat of tariffs can act as a powerful tool in international trade negotiations, providing leverage to secure stronger trade agreements and fairer terms.² Experts in negotiation strategies, such as those at Scotwork, emphasize that tariffs are not merely economic policies but also function as political and negotiation tools.⁴ The current global trade war has already seen numerous countries seeking negotiations with the U.S. in response to the imposed tariffs, indicating a potential pathway towards resolving trade disputes through diplomatic dialogue and the possibility of mutual concessions.⁹ This willingness to engage in talks suggests an optimistic scenario where these negotiations could lead to a reduction in overall global trade barriers and the establishment of fairer trade rules that ultimately benefit all participating parties. However, it is important to note that the U.S. Trade Representative has indicated that there is no specific timeline set for these negotiations, underscoring that the outcome and the quality of the agreements are prioritized over the speed of reaching them.¹⁹

Looking beyond the immediate escalation of trade barriers, it is conceivable that the current trade war could be a transient phase, eventually leading to a future where countries recognize the shared benefits of lower trade barriers and more balanced trade relationships in the long term.¹¹ Historical patterns reveal that periods of heightened protectionism have often been followed by a return to policies favoring trade liberalization.⁵ The negative economic repercussions that can arise from prolonged trade disputes, such as inflationary pressures and the risk of recession, could ultimately incentivize countries to seek common ground and collaborate towards a more stable and equitable global trading system. This would likely necessitate a shift away from unilateral actions and a renewed commitment to multilateral cooperation in trade policy.

Driving Domestic Innovation and Industrial Resurgence:

One of the potential long-term benefits suggested by proponents of the trade war is its capacity to incentivize domestic innovation within participating countries.³⁴ By increasing the cost of imported goods through tariffs, domestic markets could become relatively protected, encouraging local firms to invest more in research and development to enhance their competitiveness. The “infant industry” argument, a long-standing economic rationale for protectionism, posits that temporary shielding from foreign competition can allow nascent domestic industries the necessary time and space to grow, innovate, and eventually compete on a global scale.³⁴ While empirical evidence on the direct link between tariff protection and innovation is somewhat mixed, with some studies suggesting a negative impact ⁶¹, the possibility remains that the current trade war could foster an environment where domestic industries feel compelled to innovate and develop new technologies, products, and processes, potentially yielding long-term economic advantages.

The trade war also holds the potential to incentivize the reshoring of industries, bringing manufacturing and production back to the initiating countries.² The imposition of tariffs on imported goods directly increases their cost, making domestically produced alternatives more price-competitive. Coupled with the increased uncertainty and potential disruptions associated with international supply chains during a trade war, companies might find it strategically advantageous to relocate production closer to their primary markets. This trend of reshoring could yield several benefits, including the creation of domestic jobs, the strengthening of national supply chains, enhanced control over product quality, and potentially reduced lead times in fulfilling orders.⁷³ Data from the Reshoring Initiative indicates a significant upward trend in job announcements related to reshoring and foreign direct investment, suggesting that the trade war could indeed be a catalyst for a revitalization of domestic manufacturing sectors. However, the extent of this reshoring will likely depend on various factors, such as the specific tariff levels, the duration of the trade disputes, the overall economics of production in different locations, and the availability of a skilled domestic workforce.⁶³

Furthermore, the disruptions caused by the trade war to established global supply chains could foster greater economic self-reliance for the participating countries.² Increased reliance on foreign producers, particularly for essential goods and materials, can create vulnerabilities to geopolitical disruptions and supply shocks, as highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic and other global events.² The trade war might compel nations to develop and enhance their domestic production capabilities, thereby reducing their dependence on potentially unreliable foreign sources. This drive towards greater economic self-reliance, particularly in strategic sectors deemed critical for national security, could lead to a more diversified and resilient domestic economy, better equipped to withstand future global uncertainties. Achieving this, however, would likely require targeted government policies and investments to support the growth of domestic industries and ensure the security of essential supply chains.

Restructuring Global Supply Chains for Enhanced Resilience and Economic Advantage:

The current global trade war has the potential to trigger a significant restructuring of global supply chains as companies grapple with increased costs, uncertainty, and the risk of further trade barriers.⁴ Many manufacturers are re-evaluating their reliance on traditional sourcing locations, particularly those heavily impacted by tariffs, and are exploring alternative strategies to mitigate risks and enhance the resilience of their supply networks. This re-evaluation often involves a shift towards regionalization, where companies focus on building supply chains within specific geographic regions, and nearshoring, which entails relocating production to countries geographically closer to the home market.⁶⁴ These shifts represent a move away from the complex, globally dispersed supply chains that characterized previous decades and towards more localized and diversified networks.

This restructuring of global supply chains could lead to the development of more resilient systems. Shorter, more regionalized supply chains can offer several advantages, including reduced transportation costs and lead times, as well as diminished vulnerability to geopolitical risks and disruptions that can arise from long-distance international logistics.⁷³ Furthermore, the trend towards diversified sourcing, where companies tap into multiple countries for their inputs and production needs, can help mitigate the impact of tariffs and other trade barriers imposed by specific nations.⁴ By spreading their supply base across various geographies, businesses can become less reliant on any single source and more adaptable to changes in the global trade environment. While this restructuring process can be complex and may involve initial costs and challenges, the resulting supply chains are likely to be more agile, responsive, and ultimately more resilient to future disruptions.

Several economies might stand to benefit from this restructuring of global supply chains. Countries like Mexico, Vietnam, and India have emerged as potential beneficiaries of supply chain diversification, offering alternatives to China for manufacturing and sourcing.⁴ These nations often provide a combination of competitive labor costs, developing infrastructure, and a more stable trade relationship with the countries initiating the trade war. Additionally, the U.S. itself could benefit from the reshoring of industries and the expansion of domestic production capacity, as companies seek to avoid tariffs and establish more secure and localized supply chains.² This redistribution of global manufacturing activity has the potential to create new economic opportunities and reshape the global economic landscape, favoring countries that can offer stable production environments and navigate the shifting trade winds effectively.

The Trade War as a Catalyst for Improved International Trade Governance:

The ongoing global trade war, with its widespread disruptions and negative economic consequences, could potentially act as a catalyst for much-needed improvements in international trade governance. The significant instability and uncertainty created by escalating tariffs and retaliatory measures might create a sense of urgency among countries to engage in meaningful new international trade negotiations.⁴ The current global trade framework, particularly as embodied by the World Trade Organization (WTO), has faced increasing challenges in recent years, with some arguing that it needs significant reforms to effectively address modern trade realities, such as the rise of non-market economies and the complexities of digital trade.⁹¹ The trade war, by highlighting the limitations and shortcomings of the existing system, could provide the necessary impetus for countries to come together and negotiate updates and improvements to the rules governing international commerce.

In an optimistic scenario, these renewed negotiations could result in improved global trade rules and a more stable international trade system. Discussions might focus on critical areas such as addressing non-tariff barriers that impede trade, strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights, establishing clearer and more effective rules on subsidies and state-owned enterprises, and reforming the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO to enhance its efficiency and legitimacy.¹ Furthermore, new agreements could emerge that better reflect the evolving global economic landscape, including the increasing importance of digital trade, the need to promote more sustainable and environmentally responsible trade practices, and the integration of developing countries into the global trading system on fairer terms. While some experts express skepticism about the WTO’s ability to achieve meaningful reforms ⁷, the potential for the current trade war to act as a catalyst for a renewed commitment to multilateralism and a modernization of global trade rules remains a significant optimistic possibility.

Pathways to Lower Trade Barriers and Enhanced Market Access:

While the current global trade war is characterized by rising tariffs, it is conceivable that the resolution of these disputes could pave the way for lower trade barriers in the future. Once the initial objectives of the trade war, such as securing trade concessions or addressing perceived imbalances, are met, or if the negative economic consequences of prolonged tariffs become too severe, there could be a significant push to reduce the imposed tariffs.²³ Historical precedents offer examples of periods of high protectionism being followed by a return to lower tariffs and a greater emphasis on trade liberalization.⁵ The current high tariff regime could be viewed as a temporary measure employed to gain leverage in negotiations, with the potential for a future rollback of these tariffs as part of a comprehensive resolution to the trade war. Such a reduction in tariffs would likely lead to lower costs for businesses involved in international trade and potentially lower prices for consumers on a wide range of goods.

Furthermore, negotiations aimed at resolving the trade war could also extend to addressing and potentially removing non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that hinder international commerce.¹ NTBs, which include a wide array of measures such as import quotas, stringent regulations, and differing product standards, can often be more restrictive and complex to navigate than traditional tariffs.⁹⁸ As part of a broader agreement to de-escalate trade tensions and establish fairer trade practices, countries might agree to eliminate or harmonize certain NTBs, streamline customs procedures, and reduce unnecessary regulatory hurdles that impede the flow of goods and services across borders. This removal or reduction of NTBs, in conjunction with lower tariffs, could lead to significantly enhanced market access for businesses, reduced trade costs, and a more efficient and integrated global economy.

Identifying Long-Term Beneficiaries: Specific Industries and Sectors:

While the immediate impact of the trade war has been felt broadly across various sectors, certain specific industries and sectors could potentially experience long-term benefits as a result of the shifts in global trade patterns and policies. Domestic industries that compete directly with imports, particularly in sectors deemed strategic or essential for national security, might see sustained growth and stability due to the increased protection afforded by tariffs.⁷⁰ For instance, domestic producers of steel and aluminum could benefit from reduced competition from imports and potentially higher prices for their products.¹⁰¹ Similarly, sectors involved in the reshoring of manufacturing activities, such as the production of essential goods like medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, and certain electronics, could experience long-term growth as companies seek to establish more secure and domestic-focused supply chains.²

The potential for these long-term gains will depend on several contributing factors. Increased domestic demand, driven by consumers shifting away from more expensive imports, and reduced competition from foreign producers will play a significant role. Government support through strategic policies and incentives, such as tax credits or direct investment in key industries like clean energy and semiconductors, as seen in initiatives like the IRA and CHIPS Act, could further bolster these sectors.⁶³ Moreover, the development of new and more localized domestic supply chains will be crucial for ensuring the long-term viability and competitiveness of these industries. Finally, the ability of these sectors to foster innovation and adopt technological advancements will be essential for them to not only meet domestic needs but also to potentially compete in the global market in the future.

Conditions for Realizing the Most Optimistic Outcomes:

The realization of the most optimistic potential resolutions of the current global trade war is contingent upon a confluence of critical conditions. Firstly, successful negotiation and de-escalation of trade disputes are paramount.⁹ Diplomatic efforts leading to agreements that roll back tariffs and address the underlying issues driving trade tensions are essential to avoid prolonged economic damage and to pave the way for more cooperative trade relations.

Secondly, the implementation of strategic and targeted domestic policies will be crucial.⁸¹ Beyond the imposition of tariffs, governments need to enact supportive measures that incentivize domestic innovation, facilitate the reshoring of industries, and foster the development of resilient and secure supply chains. This might include investments in research and development, infrastructure development, and workforce training programs.

Thirdly, a commitment to international cooperation and the maintenance and reform of a rule-based global trading system, primarily through the WTO, will be vital.⁹¹ A stable and predictable global trade environment, governed by agreed-upon rules, is essential for fostering long-term economic growth and ensuring fair trade practices.

Fourthly, the adaptability and innovative capacity of businesses will play a significant role. Companies need to be proactive in responding to the changing trade landscape through strategies such as supply chain diversification, the adoption of new technologies, and a focus on creating value for consumers in a potentially higher-cost environment.

Finally, the establishment of stable and predictable trade policy environments is crucial.¹¹² Businesses require certainty regarding trade rules and tariffs to make long-term investment decisions with confidence. Frequent and unpredictable changes in trade policy can undermine the potential for positive long-term outcomes.

Conclusion:

The current global trade war, while fraught with immediate economic risks and challenges, holds within it the potential for several favorable long-term resolutions. These optimistic scenarios include the possibility of achieving fairer and more balanced trade relationships between nations, driving a resurgence in domestic innovation and industrial production, fostering the development of more resilient and adaptable global supply chains, catalyzing improvements in international trade governance, and ultimately leading to lower trade barriers and enhanced market access. Furthermore, specific industries deemed strategic or essential could experience long-term benefits from the shifts in the global trade landscape.

However, it is crucial to recognize that the realization of these optimistic outcomes is not guaranteed. It hinges upon a complex interplay of factors, most notably the willingness of nations to engage in successful diplomatic negotiations and de-escalate trade tensions. Strategic and well-crafted domestic policies that support innovation and industrial revitalization, coupled with a renewed commitment to international cooperation and a reformed rule-based trading system, will also be essential. Ultimately, the adaptability and innovative spirit of businesses in navigating the evolving trade environment, underpinned by stable and predictable trade policies, will determine the extent to which these potential benefits can be fully realized, leading towards a more balanced, resilient, and sustainable global trading system in the years to come.

Works cited

1. White House Launches Probe into Reciprocal Tariffs to Counter Foreign Trade Barriers, accessed April 9, 2025, https://gava.com/white-house-launches-probe-into-reciprocal-tariffs-to-counter-foreign-trade-barriers/
2. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Declares National Emergency to Increase our Competitive Edge, Protect our Sovereignty, and Strengthen our National and Economic Security – The White House, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-declares-national-emergency-to-increase-our-competitive-edge-protect-our-sovereignty-and-strengthen-our-national-and-economic-security/
3. Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits – The White House, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/regulating-imports-with-a-reciprocal-tariff-to-rectify-trade-practices-that-contribute-to-large-and-persistent-annual-united-states-goods-trade-deficits/
4. How Businesses Can Negotiate Smarter in a World of Tariffs, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.scotwork.se/kunskapsbank/how-businesses-can-negotiate-smarter-in-a-world-of-tariffs/
5. The Surprising History of Tariffs and Their Role in U.S. Economic Policy – USGI, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.usfunds.com/resource/the-surprising-history-of-tariffs-and-their-role-in-u-s-economic-policy/
6. A timeline of US-China tit-for-tat tariffs since Trump’s first term – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/china-us-tariffs-timeline-trump-xi-1eeed2865dc7b14e23d7eb8069ba41ea
7. How the US Reciprocal Tariff Plan Could Save the WTO – International Economic Law and Policy Blog, accessed April 9, 2025, https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2025/02/how-the-us-reciprocal-tariff-plan-could-save-the-wto.html
8. What Are Tariffs? | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-are-tariffs
9. Economist says Trump’s tariffs are a ‘win-win strategy’ to negotiate trade deals, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/economist-says-trumps-tariffs-win-win-strategy-negotiate-trade-deals
10. The price of protectionism: Understanding the economic tradeoffs of tariffs | State Street, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.statestreet.com/us/en/asset-manager/insights/price-of-protectionism-economic-tradeoffs-of-tariffs
11. 5 things to know about tariffs and how they work | PBS News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/5-things-to-know-about-tariffs-and-how-they-work
12. Are Trump’s Tariffs a Negotiation Strategy? – Everything Supply Chain, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.everythingsupplychain.com/are-trumps-tariffs-a-negotiation-strategy/
13. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Announces “Fair and Reciprocal Plan” on Trade, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-announces-fair-and-reciprocal-plan-on-trade/
14. What Is a Tariff and Why Are They Important? – Investopedia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tariff.asp
15. Tariffs’ leverage extends far beyond trade – RBC Wealth Management – Asia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-asia/insights/tariffs-leverage-extends-far-beyond-trade
16. Q&A: What Are Tariffs and How Will They Affect Us? – The Darden Report, accessed April 9, 2025, https://news.darden.virginia.edu/2025/02/04/qa-what-are-tariffs-and-how-will-they-affect-us/
17. Which Countries Are Retaliating and Which Are Negotiating Trump’s Tariffs? – Investopedia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/which-countries-are-retaliating-and-which-are-negotiating-trump-s-tariffs-11711796
18. List of countries seeking trade talks with Trump | Fox Business, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/here-every-country-working-trade-deals-us
19. WATCH: ‘No particular timeline’ for tariff negotiations, U.S. trade rep says hours before they begin – PBS, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-no-particular-timeline-for-tariff-negotiations-u-s-trade-rep-says-hours-before-they-begin
20. Trump tariffs updates: US ‘not looking at’ pausing tariffs for trade talks – Al Jazeera, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/4/7/trump-tariffs-live-asian-european-shares-plunge-as-shockwaves-spread
21. White House says 104% tariff on China will take effect Wednesday – CBS News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-104-tariff-threat-retaliatory/
22. Experts React: How the world is responding to Trump’s ‘liberation day’ tariffs, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/experts-react/experts-react-how-the-world-is-responding-to-trumps-liberation-day-tariffs/
23. As clock ticks down to Trump’s new tariffs, White House keeps world guessing – PBS, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/as-clock-ticks-down-to-trumps-new-tariffs-white-house-keeps-world-guessing
24. How the World’s Reacting to Trump’s Latest Tariffs – Time, accessed April 9, 2025, https://time.com/7274195/trump-reciprocal-tariffs-world-responses-china-eu-countries-leaders-countermeasures/
25. Trump’s tariffs aren’t strictly reciprocal. Here’s how he calculated them – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-new-tariffs-rates-trade-imbalances-math-19b0cfb6bdc8ad152d27546fe64d0075
26. See the full list of reciprocal tariffs by country from Trump’s “Liberation Day” chart, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-reciprocal-tariffs-liberation-day-list/
27. Tariffs, growth and inflation – what can 125 years of economic history tell us?, accessed April 9, 2025, https://am.lombardodier.com/gb/en/insights/2025/february/tariffs-growth-and-inflation.html
28. A Brief History of Tariffs in the United States and the Dangers of their Use Today, accessed April 9, 2025, https://news.law.fordham.edu/jcfl/2019/03/17/a-brief-history-of-tariffs-in-the-united-states-and-the-dangers-of-their-use-today/
29. Understanding the economic tradeoffs of tariffs – State Street Global Advisors, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.ssga.com/library-content/assets/pdf/global/macroeconomics/2025/the-price-of-protectionism-understanding-the-economic-tradeoffs-of-tariffs.pdf
30. History of tariffs in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_tariffs_in_the_United_States
31. Trump says high tariffs may have prevented the Great Depression. History says different – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-great-depression-smoot-hawley-tariffs-8c21caad30378a28a0798069585d5d9b
32. A History of Tariffs in the United States – No Labels, accessed April 9, 2025, https://nolabels.org/the-latest/a-history-of-tariffs-in-the-united-states/
33. U.S. Tariff Policy: Overview | Congress.gov | Library of Congress, accessed April 9, 2025, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11030
34. The Problem of the Tariff in American Economic History, 1787–1934 | Cato Institute, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.cato.org/publications/problem-tariff-american-economic-history-1787-1934
35. Historical Tariffs – Historically Speaking, accessed April 9, 2025, https://historicallyspeaking.blog/2019/01/05/historical-tariffs/
36. History of Tariffs – OmniStar Financial Group, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.omnistarfinancial.com/history-of-tariffs/
37. http://www.usfunds.com, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.usfunds.com/resource/the-surprising-history-of-tariffs-and-their-role-in-u-s-economic-policy/#:~:text=A%20Historical%20Perspective%20on%20Tariffs,than%202%25%20of%20federal%20revenue.
38. Word of the Week: Trump calls tariffs ‘the most beautiful word.’ Here’s its history – WFDD, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.wfdd.org/story/word-week-trump-calls-tariffs-most-beautiful-word-heres-its-history
39. A brief history of tariff wars | The Business Standard, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.tbsnews.net/features/panorama/brief-history-tariff-wars-1107371
40. Tariffs have a long history in the US – two charts tell that story, accessed April 9, 2025, https://news.sky.com/story/tariffs-have-a-long-history-in-the-us-two-charts-tell-that-story-13294364
41. Milestones: 1921–1936: Protectionism in the Interwar Period – Office of the Historian, accessed April 9, 2025, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/protectionism
42. How Trump’s Tariffs Compare to Previous U.S. Tariffs | TIME, accessed April 9, 2025, https://time.com/7268866/history-of-tariffs-trump/
43. A Brief History of the Constitution and Tariffs, accessed April 9, 2025, https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-the-constitution-and-tariffs
44. Lessons from 200 Years of Tariff History – Skeptic Magazine, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.skeptic.com/article/lessons-from-200-years-of-tariff-history/
45. en.wikipedia.org, accessed April 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_tariffs_in_the_United_States#:~:text=Tariff%20revenues,-See%20also%3A%20Excise&text=Tariffs%20were%20the%20greatest%20(approaching,about%2020%25%20on%20foreign%20imports.
46. President Trump’s tariffs: six questions for private equity investors | Insights – Torys LLP, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.torys.com/our-latest-thinking/publications/2025/01/six-questions-for-private-equity-investors
47. Infant-Industry Theory: Definition, Main Arguments, and History, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/infantindustry.asp
48. Infant industry argument – Wikipedia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_industry_argument
49. Infant Industry Argument – Economics Help, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/infant-industry-argument/
50. Infant Industry Argument – Definition, Main Arguments, accessed April 9, 2025, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/infant-industry-argument/
51. The Infant Industry Argument and Dynamic Comparative Advantage, accessed April 9, 2025, https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_international-trade-theory-and-policy/s12-05-the-infant-industry-argument-a.html
52. 9.5: The Infant Industry Argument and Dynamic Comparative Advantage – Social Sci LibreTexts, accessed April 9, 2025, https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Economics/International_Trade_-_Theory_and_Policy/09%3A_Trade_Policies_with_Market_Imperfections_and_Distortions/9.05%3A_The_Infant_Industry_Argument_and_Dynamic_Comparative_Advantage
53. IB Economics – Trade Protection: Arguments For and Against | Reference Library – Tutor2u, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/ib-economics-trade-protection-arguments-for-and-against
54. Can tariffs be a good thing? | PIIE, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2024/can-tariffs-be-good-thing
55. What tariffs could mean for the economy, markets and investors | Ameriprise Financial, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.ameriprise.com/financial-news-research/insights/what-tariffs-could-mean-for-economy
56. The price of protectionism: Understanding the economic tradeoffs of tariffs | State Street, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.statestreet.com/us/en/asset-owner/insights/price-of-protectionism-economic-tradeoffs-of-tariffs
57. The Basics of Tariffs and Trade Barriers – Investopedia, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/tariff-trade-barrier-basics.asp
58. Tariffs 101: What are they and how do they work? – Oxford Economics, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/tariffs-101-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work/
59. When and how should infant industries be protected? – Harvard University, accessed April 9, 2025, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/melitz/files/infant_jie.pdf
60. Tariffs—Everything you need to know but were afraid to ask | Economic Policy Institute, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.epi.org/publication/tariffs-everything-you-need-to-know-but-were-afraid-to-ask/
61. The infant industry argument: Tariffs, NTMs and innovation – EconStor, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/175482
62. Potential Implications of Announced Tariffs for Monetary Policy, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/potential-implications-of-announced-tariffs-for-monetary-policy
63. Demand, tariffs and production economics will drive reshoring revival – Enverus, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.enverus.com/newsroom/demand-tariffs-and-production-economics-will-drive-reshoring-revival/
64. Tariffs & Reshoring – Tema ETFs, accessed April 9, 2025, https://temaetfs.com/insights/tariffs-reshoring
65. Tariff uncertainty sparks manufacturing anxiety, especially among small firms, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.manufacturingdive.com/news/trump-tariffs-steel-reshoring-jobs-supply-chain-china-mexico-canada/742350/
66. As tariffs loom over pharma manufacturing, a reshoring effort is underway — but not without challenges | PharmaVoice, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.pharmavoice.com/news/tariffs-trump-pharma-manufacturing-reshoring/741958/
67. US manufacturers increasingly concerned as Trump tariff optimism fades – ING Think, accessed April 9, 2025, https://think.ing.com/articles/us-manufacturing-outlook-trump-fuelled-optimism-fades-on-tariff-worries/
68. Trump’s tariff push is a race against time, and potential voter backlash – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/tariffs-economy-inflation-trump-581d89eca9fe17e65d4f515c5b4aea37
69. Enhancing supply chain resilience in a new era of policy – Deloitte, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/managing-supply-chains-amid-tariffs.html
70. The Impact of Tariffs on American Manufacturing: A Balance Sheet – Jaggaer, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.jaggaer.com/blog/the-impact-of-tariffs-on-american-manufacturing-a-balance-sheet
71. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Imposes Tariffs on Imports from Canada, Mexico and China – The White House, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-imposes-tariffs-on-imports-from-canada-mexico-and-china/
72. Manufacturing Outlook: The Impact of New Administration Tariffs – IMA Financial Group, accessed April 9, 2025, https://imacorp.com/insights/insurance-insights-manufacturing-outlook-the-impact-of-new-administration-tariffs
73. What Is Reshoring? Benefits, Challenges, and Solutions, accessed April 9, 2025, https://scrgww.com/insights/what-is-reshoring/
74. 11 Advantages of Reshoring Manufacturing in the U.S.A. – GMI Solutions, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.gmisolutions.com/advantages-of-reshoring
75. Manufacturing and National Security – Connected World, accessed April 9, 2025, https://connectedworld.com/manufacturing-and-national-security/
76. Defense Production Act (DPA): What It Is, How It Works, and Role During COVID-19, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/defense-production-act-dpa-5187806
77. Trump’s National Security Tariffs | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/article/trumps-national-security-tariffs
78. Defense Production Act – FEMA.gov, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/disaster/defense-production-act
79. 19 USC 1862: Safeguarding national security – OLRC Home, accessed April 9, 2025, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:19%20section:1862%20edition:prelim)
80. Tariffs Are the Sword and Shield of U.S. Economic Security | BSCAI, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.bscai.org/Contractor-Connections-Hub/Business-Insights/tariffs-are-the-sword-and-shield-of-us-economic-security
81. Trade policy changes alone won’t bring manufacturing back – FreightWaves, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/trade-policy-changes-alone-wont-bring-manufacturing-back
82. Trade and National Security Actions and Low-Value Shipments – Federal Register, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/21/2025-01074/trade-and-national-security-actions-and-low-value-shipments
83. Tariffs may not bring global supply chains back; WashU research explains, accessed April 9, 2025, https://source.washu.edu/2025/02/tariffs-may-not-bring-global-supply-chains-back-washu-research-explains/
84. Q&A: Could High Tariffs Affect Manufacturing Supply Chains? – UVA Today, accessed April 9, 2025, https://news.virginia.edu/content/qa-could-high-tariffs-affect-manufacturing-supply-chains
85. A new tariff paradigm: How businesses can respond – Grant Thornton, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.grantthornton.com/insights/articles/tax/2025/new-tariff-paradigm-how-businesses-can-respond
86. Global Implications of the US Administration’s Tariff Strategy – Morgan Lewis, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/03/global-implications-of-the-us-administrations-tariff-strategy
87. US Trade Policy and Reshoring Index: The Real Impact of America’s New Trade Policies, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.middle-east.kearney.com/service/operations-performance/us-reshoring-index
88. UT Haslam Expert Weighs Effects of a Trade War on Supply Chains, accessed April 9, 2025, https://haslam.utk.edu/news/ut-haslam-expert-weighs-effects-of-a-trade-war-on-supply-chains/
89. Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains? – World Bank Documents and Reports, accessed April 9, 2025, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099812010312311610/pdf/IDU0938e50fe0608704ef70b7d005cda58b5af0d.pdf
90. Nations debate response to U.S. trade war as global markets roiled | PBS News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/nations-debate-response-to-u-s-trade-war-as-global-markets-roiled
91. ESG Econ. – Are US tariffs a catalyst for EU energy transition? – ABN AMRO.com, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.abnamro.com/research/en/our-research/esg-economist-are-us-tariffs-a-catalyst-for-eu-energy-transition
92. What Happened When China Joined the WTO? – CFR Education, accessed April 9, 2025, https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/what-happened-when-china-joined-wto
93. Navigating Global Trade in the 21st Century | The Regulatory Review, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.theregreview.org/2024/11/30/navigating-global-trade-in-the-21st-century/
94. Reforming the World Trade Organization – Chatham House, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2020-09-11-reforming-wto-schneider-petsinger.pdf.pdf
95. Trump’s Tariff Tantrum: How Sweeping Tariffs Came to Be and Why It Matters, accessed April 9, 2025, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/trump-admin-tariffs/
96. Trump Administration Announces Sweeping Tariffs Under “Fair and Reciprocal Plan”, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.globaltradeandsanctionslaw.com/trump-sweeping-tariffs-fair-reciprocal-plan/
97. China froths at Trump tariffs but has only itself to blame – The Economic Times, accessed April 9, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/china-froths-at-trump-tariffs-but-has-only-itself-to-blame/articleshow/120092413.cms
98. Tariffs are Bad, So Are Non-tariff Barriers – Customs & International Trade Law Firm, accessed April 9, 2025, https://diaztradelaw.com/tariffs-are-bad-so-are-non-tariff-barriers/
99. Trump’s trade wars deepen as China retaliates and markets fall. Here’s what to know – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/tariffs-trump-trade-war-what-to-know-e40e9eae3fa951438a764733cc55c5b8
100. Congress has the power to halt Trump’s tariffs. But Republicans aren’t ready to use it – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-republicans-senate-house-2409e9ff50290edac738ad6e4e8e78b9
101. How New U.S. Tariffs Could Create Winners: Companies Positioned to Benefit from Trade Policies – YCharts, accessed April 9, 2025, https://get.ycharts.com/resources/blog/how-new-u-s-tariffs-could-create-winners-companies-positioned-to-benefit-from-trade-policies/
102. Tariffs: Four essential investor questions answered – FS Investments, accessed April 9, 2025, https://fsinvestments.com/fs-insights/tariffs-four-essential-investor-questions-answered/
103. National Security Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Imports | Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.bipc.com/national-security-tariffs-on-steel-and-aluminum-imports
104. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Section 232 Tariffs – The White House, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-section-232-tariffs/
105. “Liberation Day” Tariffs Explained – CSIS, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/liberation-day-tariffs-explained
106. Trump Expands National Security Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Products – Wiley Rein LLP, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.wiley.law/alert-Trump-Expands-National-Security-Tariffs-on-Steel-and-Aluminum-Products
107. Industry mixed on Trump’s blanket tariffs – Manufacturing Dive, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.manufacturingdive.com/news/manufacturing-groups-mixed-on-trumps-liberation-day-tariffs-approach/744358/
108. US stock market closes lower after Trump’s latest tariff threats – AP News, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-global-trade-us-markets-670c72738d08073ea15cb0ac0c493618
109. apnews.com, accessed April 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/stocks-markets-tariffs-china-trump-b686ef0259c2f4894f9fcd1f3649a956
110. The Defense Production Act: National Security as a Potential Driver of Domestic Manufacturing Investment, accessed April 9, 2025, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-Defense-Production-Act-National-Security-as-a-Potential-Driver-of-Domestic-Manufacturing-Investment.pdf
111. Tariffs: Making the U.S. Exceptional, but Not in a Good Way – GMO, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.gmo.com/americas/research-library/tariffs—making-the-us-exceptional-but-not-in-a-good-way_gmoquarterlyletter/
112. Trump’s Tariffs Are Harming US Critical Mineral Supply Chains | TechPolicy.Press, accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.techpolicy.press/trumps-tariffs-are-harming-us-critical-mineral-supply-chains/

Framing the next four years: Tariffs, tax cuts and other uncertainties in the Trump administration – Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, accessed April 9, 2025, https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/framing-next-four-years-tariffs-tax-cuts-and-other-uncertainties-trump