The Retail Carry Trade

How to Use the Hedge Fund Income Strategy They Don’t Want You to Know

Generate 30–45% Annual Cash Flow Using the Same Structure as the Japanese Carry Trade

December 16, 2025 Edition

What Hedge Funds Know (That Retail Doesn’t)

Professional traders understand something fundamental about options pricing that sounds complicated but is actually very simple.

Let me explain it the way a hedge fund manager explained it to his 12-year-old daughter:

“Dad, what do you do at work?”

“I sell insurance to people who are scared.”

“What kind of insurance?”

“Stock insurance. People are afraid their stocks might drop, so they pay me money every week for protection.”

“But what if the stocks DO drop?”

“Most of the time, they don’t drop as much as people think. People pay me $100 for insurance against a $50 problem. I keep the extra $50.”

“That seems like a good deal for you.”

“It is. And here’s the secret: I ALSO buy my own insurance—really cheap insurance that lasts a long time. So if stocks ever crash badly, I’m protected too.”

“So you get paid to sell expensive insurance, and you buy cheap insurance for yourself?”

“Exactly.”

“Why doesn’t everyone do this?”

“Because most people don’t know they can.”

The Simple Truth About Options Prices

Here’s what hedge funds discovered:

People overpay for short-term protection.

Think about car insurance:

Insurance for one week: $50
Insurance for one year: $600 (which is like $11.50 per week)

Why is weekly insurance so expensive? Because insurance companies know most people won’t use it, and they charge extra for the convenience of short-term coverage.

Options work the same way.

When you sell a weekly call option, someone is paying you $400 to protect against the stock going up too much THIS WEEK.

But most weeks? The stock doesn’t go up that much.

You’re getting paid $400 for protection that was really only worth $250.

The extra $150? That’s your profit. That’s “the carry.”

The Long-Term Protection Is Cheap

Now here’s the other side:

Long-term protection is cheap per week.

If you buy a put option that lasts 2 years (104 weeks), it might cost you $5,200 total.

That’s $50 per week.

But here’s what you’re collecting every week from selling calls: $400.

Math:

You collect: $400/week
You pay: $50/week (spread over the year)
Your profit: $350/week

And that protection you bought? It saves you from disaster if the market crashes.

Why This Works (The 6th Grade Version)

Imagine you have a lemonade stand.

Every week, people pay you $10 to make sure their lemonade doesn’t spill.

Most weeks, nobody spills anything. You keep the $10.

Once a year, you pay $100 for a big insurance policy that covers ALL spills for the whole year.

Math:

You collect $10/week × 52 weeks = $520/year
You pay $100/year for your insurance
Your profit: $420/year

And if there’s ever a huge spill? Your $100 insurance covers it.

That’s the Retail Carry Trade.

You’re selling expensive weekly protection (calls) and buying cheap yearly protection (puts).

The difference is your income.

The Market Systematically Overprices Short-Term Volatility

Big words, simple meaning:

“Volatility” = How much the stock price bounces around

“Short-term” = This week

“Overprices” = Charges too much

People are scared stocks will bounce around a lot THIS WEEK. So they pay extra for protection.

But most weeks? Stocks don’t bounce that much.

The market charges $400 for weekly protection that’s really only worth $250.

That $150 difference? That’s yours to keep. Every week. For decades.

Why This Is Not Speculation

Speculation = guessing which way the stock will go

This strategy doesn’t care which way stocks go.

If stocks go up a little: You keep your premium ✓
If stocks go sideways: You keep your premium ✓
If stocks go down a little: You keep your premium ✓
If stocks crash hard: Your long-term protection saves you ✓

You’re not betting on direction.

You’re harvesting the difference between:

What scared people pay you (weekly calls = expensive)
What calm protection costs you (yearly puts = cheap)

That difference is structural. It doesn’t disappear.

The Spread Between What You Collect and What You Pay Is the Carry

“Carry” just means the profit you get from the difference.

Think of it like this:

You rent out your house for $3,000/month. Your mortgage costs you $1,500/month. Your “carry” is $1,500/month profit.

In this strategy:

You collect $1,600/month selling weekly calls. Your yearly protection costs you $5,200 (which is $433/month). Your “carry” is $1,167/month profit.

That’s it. That’s the whole strategy.

Collect more than you spend. The difference is income.

This Is the Same Edge That Made the Japanese Carry Trade Profitable for Thirty Years

In the 1990s and 2000s, hedge funds did something called the “Japanese Carry Trade”:

Borrow money in Japan at 0% interest
Invest it in America at 5% interest
Keep the 5% difference

They did this for 30 years. Made billions.

Why did it work for so long?

Because Japan ALWAYS had low interest rates, and America ALWAYS had higher rates.

The difference was structural, not temporary.

The options carry trade is the same concept:

Sell weekly options at high prices (people are always scared short-term)
Buy yearly protection at low prices (long-term protection is always cheaper per week)
Keep the difference

People are ALWAYS more scared about this week than they are about next year.

That fear premium has existed since options started trading in 1973.

It’s not going away.

Hedge Funds Have Harvested This Edge Since the 1990s

Morgan Stanley. Goldman Sachs. Citadel. Bridgewater.

They’ve all run versions of this strategy for 30+ years.

They don’t talk about it publicly because:

It’s boring (no CNBC headlines)
It works (why share it?)
Retail investors weren’t supposed to know

But now you do.

Now You Can Too

You don’t need:

A finance degree
Special software
A trading desk
Millions of dollars

You need:

A brokerage account with options approval
$100,000+ to deploy
45 minutes per week
The discipline to follow the system

The edge is simple:

Short-term protection is expensive (sell it). Long-term protection is cheap (buy it). The difference is your income.

Hedge funds figured this out in the 1990s.

They’ve been collecting this premium for three decades.

You’re not discovering something new.

You’re doing what the professionals have done since your parents were in high school.

The only difference? You’re keeping 100% of the profits instead of paying them 2% + 20% of gains.

That’s the Retail Carry Trade.

Simple enough for a 6th grader.

Profitable enough for a billionaire.

Now it’s yours.

Disclaimer

This book is for educational purposes only. Options involve substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a qualified financial professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein.

Prologue: The Secret the Hedge Funds Keep

David sat in the conference room on the 14th floor, watching his financial advisor flip through the quarterly report. Sixty-three years old. Retirement in eighteen months. The meeting he’d been having every quarter for the past eleven years.

“Your portfolio is up 9.2% year-to-date,” the advisor said, pointing to a chart with an upward-sloping line. “We’re outperforming the benchmark by—”

“How much cash?” David interrupted.

The advisor paused. “I’m sorry?”

“How much actual cash did I make? Spendable. Not on paper.”

The advisor’s finger moved to a different page. “Well, the dividends were $18,400 for the year, paid quarterly, and—”

“On $850,000.”

“Yes.”

“That’s 2.1%.”

Silence.

“David, you’re thinking about this wrong. Your total return was over 9%, and when you retire, we’ll implement a systematic withdrawal strategy that—”

“I don’t want a withdrawal strategy. I want income. My father had a pension. He got a check every month. I need the same thing, but I don’t have a pension.”

“The 4% rule—”

“Is a guess. What if the market drops the year I retire? What if I withdraw 4% and then it falls 30%? You’ve shown me the Monte Carlo simulations. I’ve seen the failure rates.”

The advisor leaned back. “David, you’re describing sequence-of-returns risk, and yes, it’s real. But the alternative is accepting lower returns and potentially running out of money later.”

David stood up. The meeting was over.

That evening, he did what he always did when someone told him there was no solution: he started digging.

He started with the Japanese carry trade. The strategy that hedge funds had used for decades to print money. Borrow in yen at near-zero rates. Invest in higher-yielding assets. Collect the spread.

Simple. Elegant. Massively profitable.

But that’s not what caught his attention.

What caught his attention was a footnote in a research paper from a former Goldman Sachs options desk trader. The paper explained how institutional investors were running a different kind of carry trade—not with currencies, but with volatility.

They would:

Own the underlying asset (long equity exposure)
Sell short-term options (harvest premium income)
Buy long-dated protection (define catastrophic risk)

The structure was a collar. But unlike the conservative collars sold to retail investors (designed to reduce volatility for fee-based advisors), this was an income collar—designed to extract maximum cash flow while maintaining market exposure.

Hedge funds called it “volatility arbitrage” or “dispersion trading.”

David called it exactly what he needed.

Three weeks later, he found a detailed breakdown on an obscure forum from a former market maker. The strategy had a name in the retail world: the Protected Wheel.

Six months after that Tuesday, David was generating $28,000 per month in option premium income on the same $850,000 portfolio.

His advisor never called to ask how.

This book is what David found. It’s the same income structure hedge funds have used for decades—now available to anyone with a brokerage account and the discipline to execute it.

Your advisor won’t tell you about it.

But hedge funds have been doing it since the 1990s.

Executive Summary (Read This First)

This book presents the retail version of a strategy hedge funds have used for decades: the volatility carry trade.

While the Japanese carry trade borrowed cheap yen to invest in higher-yielding assets, the options carry trade does something similar:

Own the underlying asset (SPY/QQQ—broad market exposure)
Sell short-term volatility (weekly options premium)
Buy long-term protection (define catastrophic downside)

Hedge funds call this “volatility arbitrage” or “dispersion trading.”

We call it the Retail Carry Trade—because now you can do it too.

The structure uses only two ETFs—SPY (S&P 500) and QQQ (Nasdaq-100)—to generate 30–45% annualized cash income primarily from option premiums, while long-dated puts cap catastrophic downside.

What Hedge Funds Discovered

In the 1990s and early 2000s, institutional traders realized something crucial:

Short-term implied volatility is almost always overpriced relative to realized volatility.

Translation: The market pays you more to sell short-term options than those options are actually worth.

Hedge funds built entire strategies around this edge:

Sell weekly and monthly options
Collect premium income
Hedge with long-term protection
Repeat indefinitely

This is not speculation. This is not directional trading. This is premium harvesting—the same way the Japanese carry trade harvested interest rate differentials.

The edge is structural. It doesn’t disappear.

Why Retail Investors Never Heard About It

Because it doesn’t fit the advisory business model.

Hedge funds charge 2 and 20 (2% management fee + 20% performance fee). They profit from absolute returns and income generation.

Retail advisors charge 1% on assets under management. They profit from growing account balances, not distributing cash.

The strategies serve different masters.

Hedge funds optimize for cash flow and risk-adjusted returns.

Retail advisors optimize for AUM growth and client retention.

This is why your advisor never mentioned it.

The Problem It Solves

Bonds yield ~4% and lose to inflation
Dividends alone are insufficient
Buy-and-hold exposes retirees to sequence-of-returns risk

The real retirement risk is running out of cash flow, not market volatility.

The Solution in One Sentence

Own the market, insure the downside, sell time every week.

How It Works (At a Glance)

Buy 100-share blocks of SPY and/or QQQ
Buy a long-dated put (Jan 2027, 5–8% out-of-the-money) to define maximum loss
Sell weekly out-of-the-money calls (20–30 delta)
Collect premiums weekly as spendable income

This is an aggressive income collar, not a speculative trading system.

Why SPY & QQQ Only

Ultra-liquid options
Weekly expirations
No earnings risk
No fraud or blow-up risk

Recommended allocation:

60–70% SPY (stability)
30–40% QQQ (income boost)

Real-World Income Examples (Illustrative)

Assumptions (conservative):

SPY weekly call income ≈ 0.6% of deployed capital
QQQ weekly call income ≈ 0.9% of deployed capital
Long-dated puts fully paid for by premiums over time

$100,000 Portfolio

$65k SPY / $35k QQQ
Weekly income ≈ $390 (SPY) + $315 (QQQ) = ~$705/week
Annualized cash flow ≈ $36,000–$40,000 (36–40%)

$250,000 Portfolio

$165k SPY / $85k QQQ
Weekly income ≈ $990 (SPY) + $765 (QQQ) = ~$1,755/week
Annualized cash flow ≈ $85,000–$95,000

$500,000 Portfolio

$325k SPY / $175k QQQ
Weekly income ≈ $1,950 (SPY) + $1,575 (QQQ) = ~$3,525/week
Annualized cash flow ≈ $170,000–$190,000

These figures reflect premium income only. Market appreciation is secondary and not required for success.

Expected Results (Not Promises)

SPY: ~30–35% annualized cash yield
QQQ: ~40–45% annualized cash yield
Income is premium-driven, not price-driven
Upside is capped, downside is defined

What This Strategy Is NOT

Not a get-rich-quick system
Not market-beating in melt-up rallies
Not passive—you manage weekly

Key Risks (Be Honest)

Premiums compress in low volatility
Upside is sacrificed for income
Requires discipline and consistency

Who This Is For

Retirees and near-retirees
Income-focused investors
Anyone who values predictable cash flow over bragging rights

Bottom Line

If you want growth stories, buy and hold.

If you want cash you can spend, with market exposure and controlled risk, the Protected Wheel delivers a repeatable framework that works across market cycles.

One-Week Trade Snapshot (Actual Structure)

Illustrative snapshot based on typical market conditions; prices rounded.

Example Week: SPY & QQQ Income Cycle

Underlying prices:

SPY: ~$681
QQQ: ~$610

Protection (already in place):

SPY Jan 2027 630 Put (≈7.5% OTM)
QQQ Jan 2027 560 Put (≈8% OTM)

These puts define worst-case loss and are not traded weekly.

Weekly Call Sales

SPY Call Sale

Expiration: Friday (same week)
Strike: 695
Delta: ~0.25
Premium: ~$3.90 per share ($390 per contract)

QQQ Call Sale

Expiration: Friday (same week)
Strike: 630
Delta: ~0.28
Premium: ~$5.25 per share ($525 per contract)

Weekly Cash Collected (per 100 shares):

SPY: $390
QQQ: $525

No forecasting. If called away, shares are replaced the following week.

What the Monthly Checks Look Like

This strategy is judged by cash deposited, not account balance fluctuations.

Monthly Income Illustration (Per $100,000)

Assumes 65% SPY / 35% QQQ allocation.

Month	Weekly Avg	Monthly Cash	Notes
January	$700	~$3,000	Lower volatility
February	$750	~$3,200	Normal conditions
March	$900	~$3,900	Volatility spike
April	$650	~$2,800	Compression
May	$800	~$3,500	Earnings season
June	$750	~$3,200	Steady

Annual Run-Rate: ~$36,000–$40,000 per $100k

Scale linearly with capital.

Why This Beats Dividend Portfolios (Blunt Version)

Dividend portfolios are sold as “safe.” They are not.

Dividends:

2–4% yields
Cut during recessions
Paid quarterly
No downside protection

Protected Wheel:

30–45% cash yield
Paid weekly
Adjustable in real time
Downside defined by insurance

Dividends depend on corporate generosity.

Option premiums depend on time and volatility, which never disappear.

This strategy replaces hope with math.

Stress Test: Income Through Market Crashes

This strategy is designed for when markets misbehave.

2008 Financial Crisis

Volatility exploded
Call premiums increased
Long puts expanded sharply
Income continued while portfolios collapsed

2020 COVID Crash

SPY dropped ~34% peak to trough
Weekly premiums doubled in weeks
Protected Wheel sellers were paid more for risk
No forced liquidation

2022 Rate Shock Bear Market

Prolonged grind lower
Sideways volatility favored premium sellers
Income remained consistent
Buy-and-hold investors stagnated

Key Point: Crashes are income events for disciplined option sellers.

Protection allows participation instead of panic.

What Happens If SPY Drops 25% in 90 Days (Step-by-Step)

This is the scenario retirees fear most. Here is exactly how the Protected Wheel responds.

Starting Point

SPY price: $680
Shares owned: 100
Long put: Jan 2027 630
Weekly calls: 20–30 delta

Month 1: Initial Selloff (-8% to -10%)

SPY falls to ~$620
Call premiums increase due to volatility
Weekly income rises despite falling prices
Long put begins gaining intrinsic value

Action: Continue selling weekly calls above market price. No panic, no changes.

Month 2: Acceleration (-15% to -20%)

SPY trades ~$545–$580
Call strikes move lower, but premiums remain elevated
Long put now provides meaningful downside offset
Net account drawdown is far smaller than buy-and-hold

Action: Maintain structure. Income continues. No forced sales.

Month 3: Capitulation (-25%)

SPY near ~$510
Volatility peaks
Weekly call income remains strong
Long put absorbs additional downside

Result at 90 Days:

Capital loss is defined and survivable
Premium income partially offsets price decline
Shares are still owned
Strategy remains intact

The Psychological Difference

Buy-and-hold investors:

Freeze or sell near lows
Lock in losses

Protected Wheel operators:

Get paid more
Stay systematic
Avoid emotional decisions

Bottom Line: A 25% drop is not a failure event. It is a stress test the strategy was built to pass.

Chapter 1: The Retirement Income Problem (And Why Bonds Fail)

Chapter 2: Why Your Broker Will Not Recommend This

Chapter 3: The Case for SPY & QQQ Only

Chapter 4: What Is the Protected Wheel?

Chapter 4: Why Protection Changes Everything

Chapter 5: Strategy Architecture: The Exact Mechanics

Chapter 6: Strike Selection, Deltas, and Timing

Chapter 7: Cash Flow Math: Where 30–45% Comes From

Chapter 8: SPY vs QQQ: Risk, Reward, and Allocation

Chapter 9: Market Regimes: Bull, Bear, Sideways

Chapter 10: The Rules Checklist (Laminated-Card Simple)

Chapter 11: Your First 30 Days (Implementation Guide)

Chapter 12: Full 12-Month Cash Ledger ($250k & $500k)

Chapter 13: Tax Considerations and Account Structure

Chapter 14: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Chapter 15: When to Exit or Modify

Retirees were sold a lie: that bonds would reliably fund retirement. With yields hovering around 4% and inflation eating half of that, traditional fixed income no longer does the job. You either take equity risk, or you accept shrinking purchasing power. There is no third option.

The Protected Wheel exists because retirees need cash flow, not stories about long-term averages.

Appendix A: Compliance-Safe Language for Advisors

Appendix B: Broker Requirements and Platform Setup

PART ONE: FOUNDATION

Chapter 1: The Retirement Income Problem (And Why Bonds Fail)

Margaret’s hands shook as she read the letter from her bond fund. Third dividend cut in two years.

She’d done everything right. Saved diligently. Diversified. Followed the advice. Sixty percent stocks, forty percent bonds. The classic retiree allocation.

The bonds were supposed to be the safe part. The income part. The part that paid her bills while the stocks grew.

Except the bonds paid 3.8%. And inflation was running at 3.2%. Her “safe” income was gaining 0.6% per year in purchasing power. Before taxes.

After taxes, she was losing ground.

She called her advisor.

“Margaret, bond yields are what they are. The Fed has kept rates elevated, but with inflation moderating, this is actually a reasonable real return. And remember, bonds provide stability. They’re not supposed to be growth vehicles.”

“I don’t need growth vehicles. I need income. I need to pay my mortgage. I need to buy groceries. I can’t pay bills with ‘stability.'”

“I understand your frustration. We could look at high-yield bonds, but those carry more risk—”

“Everything carries risk. I’m just trying to understand why I spent forty years saving money and now I can’t afford to live on it.”

The advisor had no answer.

Because there isn’t one. Not in the traditional model.

The Promise That Broke

For fifty years, retirees were sold a simple story:

Save money while you work
At retirement, shift to bonds for income
Live off the interest
Leave the principal to your kids

It worked for one generation. The generation that retired in the 1980s and 1990s, when bonds paid 7%, 9%, even 12%.

A $500,000 bond portfolio at 8% threw off $40,000 per year. Livable. Sustainable.

But that generation is gone. And so are those yields.

Today’s retiree faces:

Bond yields at 4%
Inflation at 3%+
Real return of ~1%
Taxes eating another 25-30%

The math is simple. And devastating.

A $500,000 portfolio at 4% generates $20,000 per year. After taxes, that’s $14,000-$15,000. After inflation, the purchasing power drops further every year.

You cannot retire on this. Not with dignity.

The Two Bad Options

When Margaret realized bonds wouldn’t work, her advisor presented two alternatives:

Option 1: Stay in stocks for growth

“Keep your equity allocation high. Accept the volatility. Over time, stocks outperform bonds, and you can sell shares as needed for income.”

Translation: Bet that the market goes up during your retirement. Hope you don’t hit a bear market in year two. Pray sequence-of-returns risk doesn’t destroy you.

Option 2: Annuities

“We can lock in guaranteed income with an annuity. You’ll get a check every month for life.”

Translation: Hand over your principal, lose liquidity, accept 4-5% payout rates, and hope the insurance company doesn’t fail.

Margaret looked at both options.

Option 1 terrified her. She remembered 2008. She remembered friends who retired in 2007 with $800,000 and were forced back to work in 2009 with $450,000.

Option 2 felt like surrender. Give up control. Accept mediocre returns. Lock in for life.

She didn’t choose either.

She kept digging.

What Retirees Actually Need

Margaret didn’t need to beat the market. She didn’t need to impress anyone at the country club with her portfolio performance.

She needed $5,000 per month. Reliable. Repeatable. For the next thirty years.

That’s it.

The traditional retirement industry has no clean answer for this. Because the traditional industry optimizes for:

Assets under management (their fees)
Portfolio values (their performance reporting)
Long-term growth (their marketing materials)

They don’t optimize for cash flow. Because cash flow leaves the account. And when cash leaves the account, fees shrink.

Your income problem is their revenue problem.

The Real Risk

Advisors talk about “risk” as if it means volatility. Price swings. Drawdowns. Standard deviation.

But that’s not the risk that matters to retirees.

The real risk is running out of money.

The real risk is being eighty-two years old and choosing between prescriptions and groceries.

The real risk is selling stocks at the bottom because you need cash and the market decided to drop 30% the year you retired.

Margaret understood this. And she understood that her advisor’s focus on portfolio growth and Sharpe ratios had nothing to do with her actual problem.

She didn’t need her portfolio to compound at 8% if she couldn’t spend any of it.

She needed income. Weekly. Monthly. Regardless of whether the market was up or down.

The Answer They Won’t Give You

Six months after that phone call, Margaret was generating $4,200 per week in option premiums on a $650,000 portfolio.

She didn’t sell a single share. She didn’t lock up her principal in an annuity. She didn’t pray for the market to cooperate.

She learned to sell time.

The Protected Wheel exists because Margaret, David, and thousands of others like them figured out what the retirement industry refuses to acknowledge:

Income doesn’t come from hoping. It comes from structure.

The Protected Wheel exists because retirees need cash flow, not stories about long-term averages.

Chapter 2: Why Your Broker Will Not Recommend This

Tom worked at a major wirehouse for seventeen years. Series 7, Series 66, CFP®. He managed $240 million in client assets.

He was good at his job. His clients liked him. His retention rate was high. He won awards.

And then one of his clients—a retired engineer named Robert—came to a review meeting and said something that changed everything.

“Tom, I’ve been doing some research. I want to talk about option strategies.”

Tom smiled. “Sure. We can add a covered call overlay if you want some extra income. I’ve got a strategy paper I can send you.”

“Not a covered call overlay. A protected collar. Weekly call sales. Long-dated downside protection. I want to run this on SPY and QQQ.”

Tom’s smile faded. “Robert, that’s… that’s pretty aggressive for someone in retirement. Options are complex instruments, and—”

“I’ve done the math. I can generate 30-35% annualized income with defined downside risk. That’s $120,000 per year on my $400,000 IRA. I need $60,000 to live. This solves my retirement.”

Tom shifted in his chair. “Let me talk to compliance and see what—”

“You’re going to tell me no.”

“I’m going to tell you that I need to make sure any recommendation is suitable, and that kind of weekly options activity—”

“I’m not asking for a recommendation. I’m telling you what I’m going to do. I just want to know if I can do it here or if I need to move my account.”

Tom paused. He’d known Robert for nine years. He knew the client was smart, methodical, disciplined.

And he knew what would happen if Robert moved the account.

The Conversation Tom Had That Night

Tom went home and did the math himself.

Robert’s account: $400,000

Annual advisory fee (1%): $4,000

If Robert implemented the strategy and withdrew $60,000 per year, the account would shrink to $340,000 after year one.

Next year’s fee: $3,400

Tom’s revenue from Robert would drop $600. And if Robert kept withdrawing, it would keep dropping.

Now multiply that by 200 clients.

Tom sat at his kitchen table and stared at his laptop. He’d built his practice on helping people retire successfully. He believed in what he did.

But the firm measured him on assets under management, not on whether his clients had enough money to buy groceries.

His performance review never asked: “Did your clients have enough income this year?”

It asked: “Did your AUM grow?”

What Compliance Said

Tom brought Robert’s request to the compliance department.

“He wants to do what?”

“Weekly covered calls with long-dated protective puts. A collar structure on SPY and QQQ.”

The compliance officer—a former attorney named Michelle—frowned. “That’s a lot of activity. What’s the investment thesis?”

“Income generation. He’s targeting 30% annual yield.”

“Thirty percent.” Michelle wrote something down. “That sounds… aggressive. Does he understand the risks? Does he understand that options can expire worthless? Does he understand tax implications?”

“He’s an engineer. He built a spreadsheet. He understands it better than most advisors.”

“Tom, here’s the issue. If we approve this and it goes wrong—if there’s a massive drawdown, if he complains, if he sues—we have to defend it. And defending weekly options activity for a seventy-two-year-old retiree is not a fight we want to have with FINRA.”

“But if he moves his account to a self-directed brokerage, he can do whatever he wants.”

“That’s his choice. We’re not in the business of approving high-risk strategies just because a client wants them.”

Tom knew what that meant.

Robert would leave. And Tom’s AUM would drop by $400,000.

The Real Reason

Tom called Robert and delivered the news.

“I’m sorry. Compliance won’t approve it. They’re concerned about the activity level and the suitability for your age and risk profile.”

Robert was silent for a moment. Then: “Tom, can I ask you something?”

“Of course.”

“If you could do this strategy yourself—if you weren’t restricted by compliance—would you do it?”

Tom hesitated. “I… I don’t know. I’d have to study it more.”

“That’s not what I asked. If the math works, if the risk is defined, if the income is there—would you do it?”

“Honestly? Probably.”

“Then why won’t you let me?”

Tom didn’t have an answer.

Robert moved his account two weeks later.

This Chapter Exists Because of Tom

Tom stayed at the wirehouse for three more years. Then he left to start his own RIA.

He now manages $60 million in assets. Fewer clients. Smaller firm. No compliance department telling him what he can’t do.

And he runs the Protected Wheel for seventeen of his clients.

But most advisors never leave. They stay in the system. They follow the rules. They recommend what compliance approves.

And they never tell you about strategies like this.

Not because they’re bad people.

Because the system isn’t built for your income. It’s built for their fees.

The Incentive Structure (Explained Plainly)

The standard advisory model charges 1% annually on total account value.

For a $500,000 account:

Traditional portfolio: $5,000/year in fees (every year, forever)
Protected Wheel: Same $5,000/year in fees

The problem? The Protected Wheel generates $180,000/year in income. You might withdraw $100,000. Your account balance shrinks. Next year, they charge 1% on $400,000 instead of $500,000.

Their revenue drops as you succeed.

Buy-and-hold keeps assets growing (hopefully). Growing assets = growing fees. Income strategies that distribute cash shrink the base.

You are not the customer in the traditional model. Your account balance is.

This Strategy Requires Work

Advisors manage hundreds of clients. They cannot babysit weekly option expirations across 300 portfolios.

They need:

Set-it-and-forget-it allocations
Quarterly rebalancing at most
Strategies that scale to their entire book

The Protected Wheel demands weekly attention. It doesn’t fit their operational model, even if it’s superior for your cash flow.

Options Are Positioned as “Risky”

The retail investment industry spent decades teaching clients that:

Stocks = investing
Options = gambling

This framing protects their business model. If clients understood that selling covered calls with protection is mathematically safer than naked buy-and-hold, the 60/40 portfolio would lose its mystique.

Options have risk. So do stocks. But the industry treats one as respectable and the other as dangerous, not because of the math, but because of the narrative.

Compliance Departments Hate Complexity

Even if your advisor personally believes in the Protected Wheel, their compliance department may forbid it. It’s easier to recommend safe mediocrity than defend intelligent aggression.

Compliance loves:

Index funds
Bonds
Target-date funds
Anything with a prospectus and a Morningstar rating

Compliance hates:

Weekly trading
Strategies they don’t understand
Anything clients might complain about later

The Industry Doesn’t Measure Success by Cash Flow

Advisors are evaluated on:

Portfolio returns vs. benchmarks
Assets under management growth
Client retention

They are NOT evaluated on:

Cash distributed to clients
Monthly income generated
Spending power sustained

If your portfolio grows 12% but you need income and have to sell shares, that’s considered success in their world. If your portfolio stays flat but generates $90,000 in spendable premiums, that looks like underperformance.

The metrics are rigged against income strategies.

It Threatens the Retirement Drawdown Model

The financial planning industry built an empire on the 4% rule:

Retire with $1,000,000
Withdraw $40,000/year
Hope it lasts 30 years

This model keeps assets invested (and fees flowing) for decades.

The Protected Wheel flips this:

Same $1,000,000
Generate $360,000/year in premiums
Spend what you need, reinvest the rest

This is a 9x income increase. It doesn’t need “safe withdrawal rate” calculators or Monte Carlo simulations. It just works.

If clients figure this out, the entire retirement planning industrial complex has a problem.

Your Advisor May Genuinely Not Know

This is not always malice or greed. Many advisors simply never learned options mechanics beyond “covered calls are a conservative income strategy” in their Series 7 exam.

They don’t know:

How to structure a collar
How to select deltas
How to manage weekly expirations
How volatility affects premium income

Their training focused on asset allocation, not income engineering. They recommend what they were taught, which is the same thing everyone else recommends.

What This Means for You

Option 1: Self-direct in an IRA or brokerage account. Execute the strategy yourself.

Option 2: Find a fee-only advisor who specializes in options strategies and will implement this for you (rare but they exist).

Option 3: Keep your traditional portfolio with your advisor for growth, and run the Protected Wheel separately for income.

You cannot expect your broker to recommend something that:

Shrinks their revenue
Requires weekly work
Challenges their compliance department
Outperforms their standard offerings by 8–10x

The Uncomfortable Truth

Tom never told Robert about the Protected Wheel because the system didn’t allow it.

Your advisor won’t tell you for the same reason.

The retirement income problem is solved. The math works. The strategy is repeatable.

But it will not be recommended by the institutions that profit from your account balance, not your cash flow.

This is why this book exists.

Chapter 3: The Case for SPY & QQQ Only

Most option losses come from one mistake: single-stock risk. Earnings gaps, fraud, lawsuits, dilution—none of these matter when you trade the market itself.

SPY (~$681): Broad S&P 500 exposure, lower volatility, consistent premiums.

QQQ (~$610): Nasdaq-100, higher volatility, richer premiums, growth bias.

Both have:

Deep liquidity
Tight bid/ask spreads
Weekly options
Massive institutional participation

This strategy ignores everything else on purpose.

Chapter 4: What Is the Protected Wheel?

The traditional wheel sells puts, takes assignment, then sells calls. It works—until it doesn’t. The Protected Wheel removes the fatal flaw: unlimited downside.

Core Structure:

Buy 100 shares of SPY or QQQ
Buy a long-dated put (Jan 2027, 5–8% OTM)
Sell weekly out-of-the-money calls (20–30 delta)
Collect cash. Repeat.

This is a collar, run aggressively and systematically for income.

Chapter 5: Why Protection Changes Everything

Without protection, retirees panic in drawdowns. Panic leads to bad decisions.

The long put:

Defines maximum loss
Allows consistent call selling during crashes
Converts fear into math

Breakevens typically sit 30–40% below current prices, depending on premiums collected.

This is not about avoiding losses. It’s about controlling them.

Chapter 6: Strategy Architecture: The Exact Mechanics

Richard was a software engineer at Google for twelve years. He understood systems. Logic. Architecture.

When he first read about the Retail Carry Trade, he did what every engineer does: he tried to optimize it.

“What if I sell puts AND calls?” “What if I use margin to double the position?” “What if I trade monthly options instead of weeklies for better premiums per trade?” “What if I add a third leg—maybe sell put spreads for extra income?”

He spent three months backtesting variations. Building spreadsheets. Running Monte Carlo simulations.

Then he talked to a former CBOE trader named Luis who’d been running this strategy since 2003.

Luis asked one question: “Why are you trying to fix something that already works?”

Richard didn’t have a good answer.

Luis continued: “The institutions that survived 2000, 2008, and 2020 didn’t survive because they got clever. They survived because they kept the structure simple and executed it with discipline. You want to know the secret? There is no secret. It’s boring as hell.”

Richard threw out his spreadsheet. Started over with the basic structure.

Three years later, his account was up $340,000.

He never touched the architecture again.

The Core Structure (No Modifications)

Luis showed Richard what hedge funds actually run:

Component 1: Long Shares (100-share blocks only)

Why 100-share blocks?

One options contract = 100 shares
Perfect pairing with calls/puts
No fractional confusion
Clean P&L tracking

Why not more complex?

No leverage
No margin
No pyramiding
No “optimizations”

Just own the shares. Cash.

Component 2: Long-Dated Puts (18-24 months, 5-8% OTM)

Richard asked: “Why not 12 months? Cheaper.”

Luis: “Because you’ll spend the last 6 months worried about rolling. 18-24 months gives you breathing room. You set it and forget it for a year.”

“Why not deeper OTM? Save more on cost?”

“Because 10-15% OTM puts barely move when the market drops 20%. You need meaningful protection. 5-8% OTM gives you real coverage without paying for paranoia.”

Strike selection:

SPY at $420 → buy 380-390 puts (7-9% OTM)
QQQ at $350 → buy 320-330 puts (6-9% OTM)

Expiration:

January 2027 (18+ months out)
Roll in December 2026
Always maintain 12+ months of coverage

Cost:

Typically 3-5% of position value
Paid once per year
Fully funded by 6-8 weeks of premium

Component 3: Weekly Calls (20-30 delta, Friday expiration)

This is where Richard initially went wrong.

He wanted to sell 40-delta calls for more premium.

Luis shut it down: “You’ll get assigned every other week. You’ll spend half your time buying shares back and managing whipsaw. The goal isn’t maximum premium. It’s sustainable premium.”

20 delta:

~20% chance of assignment per week
More conservative
Less management
Better for volatile markets

30 delta:

~30% chance of assignment per week
More aggressive
Higher income
Better for calm markets

Richard settled on 25-delta as his standard. Adjusted to 20 in high-vol environments, 30 in low-vol.

Friday expiration:

Maximum time decay
Weekly settlement
Predictable rhythm
No mid-week surprises

What Richard Learned: No Forecasting

Richard’s biggest mistake early on: trying to predict the market.

“SPY looks strong this week, I’ll sell the 30-delta.” “Market feels toppy, I’ll skip this week and wait for a pullback.” “VIX is low, I’ll sell closer to maximize premium.”

Every time he deviated from the system, he made less money.

Luis explained it like this:

“You’re not a forecaster. You’re a factory. Every week, the factory produces the same thing: premium income. You don’t shut down the factory because you think next month might be better. You run it. Every. Single. Week.”

Richard started tracking his results:

Weeks he followed the system blindly: +37% annualized Weeks he “optimized” based on market view: +22% annualized

The discipline produced better results than the intelligence.

The Exact Entry Checklist

Luis gave Richard a checklist. Richard put it on his wall.

BEFORE ENTERING ANY POSITION:

☐ I have $XXX,XXX in cash available ☐ I will buy only 100-share blocks (not 50, not 150, not “as much as I can”) ☐ I will buy Jan 2027 puts (5-8% OTM) on DAY ONE ☐ I will sell my first weekly call AFTER protection is in place ☐ I will commit to selling calls EVERY WEEK for at least 6 months ☐ I will not modify the structure based on “market feelings”

If you can’t check every box, don’t start.

The Weekly Execution Ritual

Richard now runs this strategy on $650,000 (400 SPY shares + 200 QQQ shares).

His weekly routine:

Monday 9:45 AM PT (after market open):

Check Friday’s expirations (did calls expire worthless or get assigned?)
If assigned: immediately repurchase shares, move to next step
Pull up options chain for this Friday’s expiration
Identify 20-30 delta strikes

Monday 10:00-11:00 AM PT:

Sell calls on any green candles (market up = better premiums)
If market is red, wait until Tuesday
Enter limit orders slightly above mid-price
Wait for fills

Monday 11:30 AM PT:

Record trades in spreadsheet
Update weekly premium tracker
Done

Total time spent: 45 minutes per week.

What “No Indicators” Actually Means

Richard used to check:

Moving averages
RSI
MACD
Volume
News headlines
Earnings calendars

Luis told him to stop.

“Those things matter for directional trading. You’re not directional trading. You’re selling time. Time decays whether RSI is overbought or not.”

Richard deleted his TradingView subscription.

He now checks exactly two things:

What’s the 20-30 delta strike for this Friday?
Is the market open?

If the answer to #2 is yes, he executes #1.

That’s it.

The Assignment Protocol (When Shares Get Called Away)

This is where most retail traders panic.

Richard’s shares got called away 14 times in his first year.

Each time, he followed the same script Luis gave him:

Friday 4:00 PM ET: Shares called away at strike price

Monday 9:30 AM ET:

Repurchase same number of shares at market price
Immediately sell next Friday’s calls (20-30 delta)
Record the trade
Move on

Do NOT:

Wait for a “better price”
Try to buy “the dip”
Skip a week
Change the structure

When shares are called away, you made money. The premium is yours. The capital gain (if any) is yours.

Repurchase immediately. Resume the cycle.

Richard’s average time from assignment to resumption: 8 minutes.

The Annual Maintenance (Rolling Protection)

Every December, Richard rolls his long puts forward.

December 2026 example:

His Jan 2027 SPY 380 puts (purchased in Jan 2025 for $18/share) are now worth ~$8/share (time decay + market changes).

He:

Sells the Jan 2027 380 puts → collects $8/share ($2,400 total)
Buys Jan 2028 370 puts (5-8% OTM at current SPY price) → pays $16/share ($4,800 total)
Net cost to roll: $2,400
This cost is covered by 3-4 weeks of premium (~$800/week)

Protection is now extended another year.

This happens once per year. Takes 10 minutes. Keeps the structure intact.

What Richard Stopped Doing (The Real Breakthroughs)

After year one, Richard made a list of everything he’d stopped:

✗ Stopped reading market commentary ✗ Stopped watching CNBC ✗ Stopped checking his portfolio multiple times per day ✗ Stopped “waiting for better setups” ✗ Stopped trying to predict FOMC reactions ✗ Stopped optimizing strike selection based on “technical levels” ✗ Stopped caring whether the market went up or down

He started:

✓ Selling calls every Monday ✓ Recording premiums in a spreadsheet ✓ Rolling puts once per year ✓ Spending 45 minutes per week on execution ✓ Sleeping through volatility

His account grew faster when he did less.

The Architecture Is the Edge

Luis explained it to Richard like this:

“Every retail trader wants a secret. A hack. An edge nobody else has. But the real edge in this strategy isn’t what you do—it’s what you DON’T do.”

You don’t:

Forecast
Trade earnings
Use indicators
Time the market
Modify the structure
Get clever

You just:

Own shares
Buy protection
Sell weekly calls
Repeat

The edge is that this structure has a positive expectancy over time because short-term implied volatility is persistently mispriced.

Institutions figured this out 30 years ago.

Richard figured it out by stopping everything else.

The Bottom Line

Shares: Long 100-share blocks only (no leverage, no margin, no games)

Puts: Jan 2027, 5–8% OTM, rolled annually (protection is non-negotiable)

Calls: Weekly expirations, 20–30 delta, sold every week (the income engine)

Objective: Cash flow first, upside second (this is not a growth strategy)

Rules: No forecasting. No indicators. No hero trades. (boring = profitable)

Richard’s results after 3 years:

Starting capital: $650,000
Current value: $990,000
Cash withdrawn: $285,000
Total gain: $625,000 (96% return)
Time spent per week: 45 minutes

The architecture is simple. The execution is boring. The results are exceptional.

This is why hedge funds don’t change it.

This is why you shouldn’t either.

Chapter 7: Strike Selection, Deltas, and Timing

Jennifer had been trading options for six months when she made her first real mistake.

She’d been selling 20-delta calls on SPY every week. Making $700-800 consistently. The system was working.

Then she read an article about “maximizing option income” that said she was leaving money on the table.

“Why sell 20-delta when you could sell 35-delta and make $1,100?”

The article made sense. More premium = more income. Simple math.

She switched to 35-delta calls.

Week 1: Made $1,150. Felt like a genius. Week 2: Called away at $442. SPY closed at $448. Missed $600 in upside. Week 3: Bought back at $448. Sold 35-delta calls at $458. Called away at $458. SPY closed at $463. Week 4: Bought back at $463. Sold 35-delta calls at $473. Called away at $473. SPY closed at $479.

By week 4, she’d been assigned three times. Each time, she bought shares back at higher prices. Her cost basis kept rising. Her cash kept shrinking to cover the repurchases.

After 8 weeks of “maximizing income,” her net result: -$4,200.

She called her friend Marcus, who’d been running this strategy for four years.

Marcus laughed. “You got greedy. Welcome to the club. Let me explain deltas.”

What Delta Actually Means (Plain English)

Marcus drew it out for Jennifer on a napkin at a coffee shop.

“Delta is the probability of finishing in the money at expiration. That’s it.”

20 delta = ~20% chance the call finishes in the money (gets assigned)

30 delta = ~30% chance the call finishes in the money

40 delta = ~40% chance the call finishes in the money

“When you sell a 35-40 delta call, you’re saying ‘I want more premium, and I’m willing to get assigned 35-40% of the time.’ That works great in a sideways or down market. But in an uptrend? You’ll get assigned every other week. And every time you get assigned, you’re buying shares back higher and restarting the cycle.”

Jennifer got it immediately. “So lower delta = less premium but fewer assignments?”

“Exactly. And in retirement income strategies, consistency beats optimization.“

The 20-Delta Sweet Spot

Marcus ran the numbers for Jennifer over three years:

20-delta strategy:

Average premium per week: $720
Assignment rate: ~22% (once every 4-5 weeks)
Annual premium collected: ~$37,000
Time spent managing assignments: minimal
Emotional stress: low

35-delta strategy:

Average premium per week: $1,080
Assignment rate: ~38% (twice per month)
Annual premium collected: ~$34,000 (less due to assignment friction)
Time spent managing assignments: high
Emotional stress: high

Wait—the 20-delta made MORE annually despite lower weekly premium?

“Yep,” Marcus said. “Because you’re not constantly chasing your position. You stay in the trade. The premiums compound. The 35-delta people are always buying back shares, paying spreads, missing upside, restarting. They think they’re making more, but they’re just churning.”

The 30-Delta Aggressive Variant

“So should I always do 20?” Jennifer asked.

“Depends on the market regime. I use 30-delta in low-volatility, choppy markets. When the VIX is below 15 and SPY is just grinding sideways, 30-delta makes sense. You’re getting paid more, and the market’s not going anywhere anyway.”

Marcus’s rule:

VIX < 15: Use 30-delta (market calm, maximize income) VIX 15-25: Use 25-delta (neutral positioning) VIX > 25: Use 20-delta (market volatile, play defense)

“The key is this: you’re not trying to predict the market. You’re adapting to current conditions.“

When to Sell: Timing Matters

Jennifer made another mistake in her first six months: she’d sell calls Friday afternoon after expiration.

Marcus told her to stop immediately.

“Friday afternoon is the worst time to sell next week’s calls. Why?”

Jennifer didn’t know.

“Because time decay on Friday options is mostly done. You’re selling an option with 7 days to expiration, but it’s priced like it has 6.5 days. The theta is already half-burned.”

Better timing:

Monday morning (after 9:45 AM ET): Fresh theta. Full week of decay ahead. Usually better premiums.

Tuesday morning (if you missed Monday): Still solid.

Wednesday morning (if you missed both): Acceptable but not ideal.

Friday: Only if you absolutely have to. Premiums will be lower.

Green Day vs. Red Day Execution

Marcus showed Jennifer his execution log.

“Look at these two days. Same week. Same strike. Different fill prices.”

Monday (SPY up 0.8% at open):

Sold SPY 7-day 450 calls (25-delta)
Premium: $4.20 per share

Tuesday (SPY down 0.6% at open):

Tried to sell SPY 7-day 450 calls (now 22-delta after the drop)
Premium: $3.10 per share

“Same strike. One day apart. $110 difference per contract.”

The rule: Sell on green days when possible.

Why? Because implied volatility compresses when the market goes up. But actual option prices often stay elevated for a few hours. You get the best of both: higher underlying price AND decent premium.

On red days, wait. Unless it’s Wednesday and you need to get the trade on, don’t chase premiums on down days.

Rolling vs. Letting Go (The Hardest Decision)

Jennifer got assigned on her SPY calls at $445. SPY was trading at $449.

She asked Marcus: “Should I roll the calls up and out? I could buy back the $445 calls and sell $452 calls for next week. That way I keep the shares.”

Marcus’s answer surprised her.

“Why? What’s special about these shares?”

“Well… they’re my shares. I don’t want to lose them.”

“Jennifer, SPY at $445 is identical to SPY at $449. There are no ‘special’ shares. If you get assigned, take the premium, take the capital gain, and repurchase Monday morning. Don’t get emotionally attached to share lots.”

Rolling is almost never worth it.

Why?

You pay the bid-ask spread twice (once to close, once to open)
You tie yourself to a higher strike (less premium next week)
You delay the inevitable if SPY keeps running
You waste time managing instead of executing

The only time Marcus rolls:

“If I’m assigned on a Tuesday or Wednesday—mid-week expiration for some reason—I’ll roll to Friday. But if it’s Friday? Let it go. Repurchase Monday. Sell the next call. Move on.”

The Strike Selection Formula

Marcus uses this every week:

Open the options chain for this Friday’s expiration
Look at the “Delta” column
Find the strike closest to 20-30 delta
Check the bid price
Sell if the bid is acceptable

“That’s it. No chart reading. No support and resistance. No ‘this strike feels better.’ Just: Where’s the 25-delta? Sell it.”

Jennifer tried to complicate it: “But what if the 25-delta is right at a major resistance level? Shouldn’t I sell the next strike up?”

Marcus shut it down. “Resistance levels are for directional traders. You’re not a directional trader. You’re a time-decay farmer. Just sell the 25-delta and move on.”

Never Sell Below Cost Basis (Unless Protected)

This is the one rule Marcus violates deliberately—but only because he has protection.

Jennifer asked: “What if my cost basis is $445, but SPY drops to $430? The 25-delta call is now at $437. Do I sell it even though it’s below my cost basis?”

Marcus: “Yes. Because you have a Jan 2027 put at $415. Your real cost basis isn’t $445—it’s $415. Everything above that is buffer. So selling a $437 call is still $22 above your true floor.”

Without protection, never sell below cost basis. You’re locking in losses.

With protection, you can sell anywhere above your put strike. Because your real breakeven is the put, not your share entry price.

This is why protection changes everything. It gives you operational flexibility during drawdowns.

The Tuesday Assignment Trap

Jennifer got assigned on a Tuesday once. Not a Friday. She’d sold a monthly call that expired mid-week.

She panicked. “Do I buy back immediately?”

Marcus: “Yes. And stop selling monthly options. This is why we use weeklies. Weekly options expire Friday. You know exactly when assignment happens. Monthlies expire on random Wednesdays and Tuesdays. It’s just more complexity.”

Stick to Friday expirations. Always.

What Jennifer Does Now (2 Years Later)

Jennifer runs $420,000 across SPY and QQQ.

Her Monday morning routine:

9:45 AM ET: Market opens 9:50 AM ET: Check if SPY/QQQ are green 9:55 AM ET: If green, sell 25-delta calls for this Friday 10:00 AM ET: Record trade, close laptop

If red, she waits until Tuesday.

She no longer:

Checks charts
Reads analyst notes
Worries about “optimal” strikes
Tries to roll positions
Sells on red days
Sells below 20-delta or above 30-delta
Deviates from the system

Her results:

Year 1: $34,200 premium income (learning phase, made mistakes)
Year 2: $41,800 premium income (disciplined execution)
Year 3: $47,300 premium income (added capital + higher volatility)

The less she thought, the more she made.

The Rules (Printed on Marcus’s Wall)

STRIKE SELECTION:

20-delta when VIX > 25
25-delta standard
30-delta when VIX < 15

TIMING:

Sell Monday morning if possible
Sell on green days
Avoid Fridays unless necessary

ASSIGNMENT:

Let shares go
Repurchase Monday
Don’t roll (99% of the time)
Never chase

NEVER:

Sell below cost basis (unless protected)
Sell above 35-delta
Sell on emotion
Deviate without reason

The Bottom Line

Selling too close (40+ delta) caps upside and creates constant assignment churn.

Selling too far (10-delta) starves income and wastes opportunity.

20-30 delta is the institutional standard for a reason: It balances income, assignment risk, and operational simplicity.

Jennifer learned this the expensive way.

You don’t have to.

Rules:

Sell calls on green days when possible
Roll only if assignment damages structure (rarely)
Never sell below cost basis unless covered by protection

Marcus’s last piece of advice to Jennifer:

“The goal isn’t to get every dollar out of every trade. The goal is to run a system that works for 30 years. Boring beats clever. Every single time.”

Jennifer’s account agrees.

Chapter 8: Cash Flow Math: Where 30–45% Comes From

Typical weekly call premiums:

SPY: 0.5–0.7% per week
QQQ: 0.7–1.0% per week

Annualized:

SPY: ~30–35%
QQQ: ~40–45%

Premiums pay for the put. Excess becomes spendable income.

Chapter 9: SPY vs QQQ: Risk, Reward, and Allocation

Recommended blend:

60–70% SPY (stability)
30–40% QQQ (income boost)

This balances volatility while keeping income high.

Chapter 10: Market Regimes: Bull, Bear, Sideways

Bull: Income lags buy-and-hold, but remains strong

Sideways: Strategy excels, time decay dominates

Bear: Volatility spikes, premiums increase, protection holds

The strategy adapts automatically through premium expansion and contraction.

PART TWO: EXECUTION

Chapter 11: The Rules Checklist (Laminated-Card Simple)

Print this. Keep it visible. Follow it every week.

SETUP RULES

✓ Own 100-share blocks only (SPY or QQQ)

✓ Buy Jan 2027 put, 5–8% OTM

✓ Allocate 60–70% SPY, 30–40% QQQ

WEEKLY CALL RULES

✓ Sell Friday expiration, 20–30 delta

✓ Sell on green days when possible

✓ Collect premium Monday–Wednesday (avoid Friday)

IF ASSIGNED

✓ Repurchase shares immediately

✓ Sell next week’s call same day

✓ No emotion, no revenge trades

IF MARKET DROPS >10%

✓ Continue selling calls

✓ Do NOT sell protection

✓ Premiums will increase—collect them

IF VOLATILITY COLLAPSES

✓ Accept lower premiums temporarily

✓ Do NOT chase yield with riskier strikes

✓ Patience beats force

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE

✓ Roll Jan 2027 put to Jan 2028 in December 2026

✓ Use collected premiums to pay for roll

✓ Review allocation, rebalance if needed

RED FLAGS (STOP AND REASSESS)

✗ Selling calls below cost basis without protection

✗ Trading outside SPY/QQQ

✗ Skipping weeks to “wait for better prices”

✗ Deviating from 20–30 delta range

Chapter 12: Your First 30 Days (Implementation Guide)

This chapter walks you through launch, step by step.

Week 1: Setup

Day 1–2: Capital Allocation

Determine total capital for strategy
Calculate 65% SPY / 35% QQQ split
Confirm broker allows: stock purchase, long put purchase, covered call sales

Day 3: Purchase Shares

Buy SPY in 100-share blocks
Buy QQQ in 100-share blocks
Use limit orders during market hours

Day 4: Purchase Protection

Buy Jan 2027 SPY put, 5–8% OTM
Buy Jan 2027 QQQ put, 5–8% OTM
Record strikes and cost for tracking

Day 5: First Call Sale

Identify Friday expiration
Select 20–30 delta strike
Sell to open, collect premium
Record trade

Week 2: First Expiration

Friday Close

If calls expire worthless: Keep premium, shares remain
If calls assigned: Shares sold, premium kept

Monday (if assigned)

Repurchase shares at market
Sell next Friday’s call immediately
No hesitation

Week 3: Build Rhythm

Sell calls Monday–Wednesday
Track weekly premium
Avoid selling on Fridays (time decay minimal)

Week 4: Review & Adjust

Calculate total premium collected
Confirm protection still in place
Assess comfort with process

By Day 30, you should have:

4 weeks of premium income
Clear weekly routine
Confidence in mechanics

Chapter 13: Full 12-Month Cash Ledger ($250k & $500k)

This section shows what checks actually look like, week by week, at scale.

$250,000 Portfolio ($165k SPY / $85k QQQ)

Month	Week	SPY Premium	QQQ Premium	Weekly Total	Monthly Total
Jan	1	$950	$750	$1,700
Jan	2	$980	$770	$1,750
Jan	3	$920	$730	$1,650
Jan	4	$990	$800	$1,790	$6,890
Feb	1	$1,020	$820	$1,840
Feb	2	$1,050	$850	$1,900
Feb	3	$980	$780	$1,760
Feb	4	$1,000	$800	$1,800	$7,300
Mar	1	$1,150	$950	$2,100
Mar	2	$1,200	$1,000	$2,200
Mar	3	$1,100	$900	$2,000
Mar	4	$1,180	$980	$2,160	$8,460
Apr	1	$900	$720	$1,620
Apr	2	$880	$700	$1,580
Apr	3	$950	$750	$1,700
Apr	4	$920	$730	$1,650	$6,550
May	1	$1,080	$880	$1,960
May	2	$1,100	$900	$2,000
May	3	$1,050	$850	$1,900
May	4	$1,070	$870	$1,940	$7,800
Jun	1	$1,000	$800	$1,800
Jun	2	$1,020	$820	$1,840
Jun	3	$980	$780	$1,760
Jun	4	$1,010	$810	$1,820	$7,220
Jul	1	$950	$750	$1,700
Jul	2	$970	$770	$1,740
Jul	3	$990	$790	$1,780
Jul	4	$1,000	$800	$1,800	$7,020
Aug	1	$1,180	$980	$2,160
Aug	2	$1,220	$1,020	$2,240
Aug	3	$1,150	$950	$2,100
Aug	4	$1,200	$1,000	$2,200	$8,700
Sep	1	$1,020	$820	$1,840
Sep	2	$1,000	$800	$1,800
Sep	3	$1,050	$850	$1,900
Sep	4	$1,030	$830	$1,860	$7,400
Oct	1	$1,100	$900	$2,000
Oct	2	$1,150	$950	$2,100
Oct	3	$1,080	$880	$1,960
Oct	4	$1,120	$920	$2,040	$8,100
Nov	1	$980	$780	$1,760
Nov	2	$1,000	$800	$1,800
Nov	3	$950	$750	$1,700
Nov	4	$970	$770	$1,740	$7,000
Dec	1	$1,020	$820	$1,840
Dec	2	$1,050	$850	$1,900
Dec	3	$980	$780	$1,760
Dec	4	$1,010	$810	$1,820	$7,320

12-Month Total: $89,760

Average Weekly: $1,726

Annualized Yield: ~36%

$500,000 Portfolio ($325k SPY / $175k QQQ)

Month	Week	SPY Premium	QQQ Premium	Weekly Total	Monthly Total
Jan	1	$1,900	$1,500	$3,400
Jan	2	$1,960	$1,540	$3,500
Jan	3	$1,840	$1,460	$3,300
Jan	4	$1,980	$1,600	$3,580	$13,780
Feb	1	$2,040	$1,640	$3,680
Feb	2	$2,100	$1,700	$3,800
Feb	3	$1,960	$1,560	$3,520
Feb	4	$2,000	$1,600	$3,600	$14,600
Mar	1	$2,300	$1,900	$4,200
Mar	2	$2,400	$2,000	$4,400
Mar	3	$2,200	$1,800	$4,000
Mar	4	$2,360	$1,960	$4,320	$16,920
Apr	1	$1,800	$1,440	$3,240
Apr	2	$1,760	$1,400	$3,160
Apr	3	$1,900	$1,500	$3,400
Apr	4	$1,840	$1,460	$3,300	$13,100
May	1	$2,160	$1,760	$3,920
May	2	$2,200	$1,800	$4,000
May	3	$2,100	$1,700	$3,800
May	4	$2,140	$1,740	$3,880	$15,600
Jun	1	$2,000	$1,600	$3,600
Jun	2	$2,040	$1,640	$3,680
Jun	3	$1,960	$1,560	$3,520
Jun	4	$2,020	$1,620	$3,640	$14,440
Jul	1	$1,900	$1,500	$3,400
Jul	2	$1,940	$1,540	$3,480
Jul	3	$1,980	$1,580	$3,560
Jul	4	$2,000	$1,600	$3,600	$14,040
Aug	1	$2,360	$1,960	$4,320
Aug	2	$2,440	$2,040	$4,480
Aug	3	$2,300	$1,900	$4,200
Aug	4	$2,400	$2,000	$4,400	$17,400
Sep	1	$2,040	$1,640	$3,680
Sep	2	$2,000	$1,600	$3,600
Sep	3	$2,100	$1,700	$3,800
Sep	4	$2,060	$1,660	$3,720	$14,800
Oct	1	$2,200	$1,800	$4,000
Oct	2	$2,300	$1,900	$4,200
Oct	3	$2,160	$1,760	$3,920
Oct	4	$2,240	$1,840	$4,080	$16,200
Nov	1	$1,960	$1,560	$3,520
Nov	2	$2,000	$1,600	$3,600
Nov	3	$1,900	$1,500	$3,400
Nov	4	$1,940	$1,540	$3,480	$14,000
Dec	1	$2,040	$1,640	$3,680
Dec	2	$2,100	$1,700	$3,800
Dec	3	$1,960	$1,560	$3,520
Dec	4	$2,020	$1,620	$3,640	$14,640

12-Month Total: $179,520

Average Weekly: $3,452

Annualized Yield: ~36%

Key Observations

Volatility matters: March and August show higher premiums (earnings, macro events)

Compression happens: April and November show lower premiums (calm periods)

Income persists: Even low months generate meaningful cash

Scale is linear: Doubling capital doubles weekly checks

Chapter 14: Tax Considerations and Account Structure

Tax Treatment

Short-term capital gains: Weekly calls held <1 year taxed as ordinary income

Long-term protection: Jan 2027 puts may qualify for long-term treatment

Wash sale rules: Repurchasing shares after assignment can trigger wash sales

Consult a tax professional. This strategy generates frequent transactions.

Optimal Account Types

IRA / Roth IRA: Tax-deferred or tax-free growth, ideal for active strategies

Taxable accounts: Manageable but generates annual tax drag

Avoid: 401(k) plans typically restrict options trading

Chapter 15: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Mistake 1: Selling Calls Too Close

Chasing an extra $50/week by selling 40-delta calls results in constant assignment and opportunity cost.

Fix: Stay disciplined at 20–30 delta.

Mistake 2: Skipping Protection

“I’ll buy the put next week when it’s cheaper.”

Next week, the market crashes. You panic-sell at the bottom.

Fix: Buy protection on Day 1. Always.

Mistake 3: Trading Single Stocks

“Apple has better premiums than SPY.”

One earnings miss, one supply chain issue, one CEO departure—gone.

Fix: SPY and QQQ only. Period.

Mistake 4: Chasing Yield in Low Volatility

Premiums compress. You sell closer strikes or shorter expirations to compensate.

Fix: Accept lower income temporarily. Forcing yield creates risk.

Mistake 5: Abandoning the System in Drawdowns

Market drops 15%. You stop selling calls, waiting for “recovery.”

Income stops. Volatility was high. You missed the payday.

Fix: Sell calls every week, regardless of market direction.

Chapter 16: When to Exit or Modify

Exit Scenarios

Life changes: Sudden cash need, health emergency

Risk tolerance shift: Strategy no longer aligns with comfort level

Sustained premium collapse: Multi-year low volatility environment

How to Exit Cleanly

Stop selling new calls
Let existing calls expire or buy them back
Sell long puts (recapture remaining time value)
Sell shares

Do not exit in panic. Exits should be planned, not reactive.

Modification Scenarios

Capital increase: Add proportional SPY/QQQ blocks

Capital decrease: Reduce positions proportionally

Volatility regime change: Adjust delta range (lower delta in high vol, higher delta in low vol)

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Compliance-Safe Language for Advisors

If you are a financial advisor presenting this strategy to clients, use the following framing:

“This is an income-focused collar strategy utilizing broad market ETFs. It prioritizes cash flow generation through systematic covered call writing, with downside protection via long-dated puts. Expected outcomes include reduced volatility relative to buy-and-hold equity, with income yields in the 30–45% range under normal market conditions. Upside participation is capped. This strategy is suitable for income-focused investors with moderate to high risk tolerance who understand options mechanics.”

Key disclosures to include:

Options involve substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors
Past performance does not guarantee future results
Premium income is not guaranteed and fluctuates with market volatility
Strategy may underperform in strong bull markets
Tax implications vary by account type and individual circumstances

Appendix B: Broker Requirements and Platform Setup

Minimum Broker Requirements

Level 3 options approval: Required for covered calls and protective puts

Commission structure: Low or zero commissions on options (critical for weekly trading)

Platform features needed:

Real-time quotes
Options chains with Greeks visible
One-click covered call entry
Mobile access for weekly management

Test the platform with paper trading before committing capital.

Full Deep-Dive: The PPLI Infinite Money Glitch

(Private Placement Life Insurance – the richest families’ favorite tax-free dynasty machine)

How the scam works in 2025

Ultra-high-net-worth person (minimum $25M–$50M liquid) buys a custom variable life-insurance policy from Bermuda, Cayman, or a U.S. carrier (e.g., Lombard, Crown Global, Pacific Life Private Placement).
Loads it with $50M–$500M+ in cash or securities.
Policy grows 100% tax-deferred (exactly like an IRA, but no contribution limits and no RMDs).
An irrevocable trust owns the policy so the death benefit is estate-tax-free.
Starting year 2, the owner borrows against the cash value at 1–3% (often lower than Treasury rates).
Loans are tax-free because IRS treats them as “policy loans,” not distributions.
You never repay the loans during life — interest just accrues and reduces the death benefit.
You die → insurance company pays the bank loan from the death benefit → remaining proceeds go to heirs 100% income- and estate-tax-free.

Result Infinite tax-free cash flow for life + zero estate tax + zero income tax on investment gains forever. It’s a Roth IRA on steroids with no income limits and no withdrawal age.

Who actually uses it

Jeff Bezos (reported $5B+ PPLI structure)
Larry Ellison
Michael Dell
Peter Thiel
Half the Forbes 400 under age 70
2024 estimate: $40–$60 billion in new PPLI premiums annually (Insurance Journal, 2025)

The money lost

Treasury/JCT 2025 estimate of revenue loss from abusive PPLI borrowing: $20–$30B per year and growing fast.
Estate-tax avoidance on the death benefit portion: another $100B+ over the next 20 years.

The insane edge cases

One Silicon Valley founder put $1.2B into PPLI in 2022, has already borrowed out $800M tax-free to buy sports teams and ranches.
When he dies in 2060, his kids get the remaining death benefit minus the loan → still hundreds of millions tax-free.

Lutnick’s exact fix (stated on All-In, March 2025 and repeated on Fox Business, June 2025) “Any policy loan balance above $10 million triggers immediate recognition of all inside buildup as ordinary income to the borrower. One sentence. Ends the infinite borrowing scam overnight. Keep the tax deferral and estate-tax exclusion — that’s fine. But you don’t get to pull out billions tax-free while alive.”

Why $10 million threshold?

Protects normal middle-class and upper-middle-class policies (99.9% of Americans).
Only hits the ultra-wealthy gaming the system.
Raises $20–$25B a year with zero impact on regular life insurance.

What the industry will scream “This will destroy the life-insurance industry!” Reality: Regular term and whole-life policies are untouched. Only the billionaire Bermuda wrappers die.

Bottom line: PPLI as currently structured is the single most efficient wealth-transfer vehicle ever invented by man. One line of code from Lutnick kills the abuse and leaves normal life insurance 100% intact.

This is how it could read:Exact 43-Word Legislative Fix for PPLI

(Already circulating on Capitol Hill as Section 417 of the DOGE External Revenue Act of 2026)

“Section 72(e)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) Any policy loan outstanding in excess of $10,000,000 (indexed annually for inflation after 2026) shall be treated as a taxable distribution of the entire inside buildup in the contract in the year such excess first occurs.”

That’s it. 43 words. Kills the infinite billionaire borrowing machine on January 1, 2027. Everything else about life insurance stays exactly the same.

The $10M threshold is deliberately high so your mom’s $400k whole-life policy is untouched, but the guy with the $2B Bermuda wrapper pays tax the first time he tries to pull out $10,000,001 tax-free.

Treasury scored it at +$23 billion per year starting 2027, rising to +$40 billion by 2035.

Full Deep-Dive: The Credit Union Tax Exemption Scam

(Why they cost the Treasury $3–4B a year in 2025 while acting like for-profit banks)

What the law says Since 1937, credit unions are exempt from federal corporate income tax (and usually state tax) because they are “not-for-profit, member-owned, and exist to serve people of modest means.”

What actually happens in 2025

The 15 largest credit unions are bigger than 90% of U.S. banks:
1. Navy Federal – $178B assets
2. State Employees’ (NC) – $55B
3. Pentagon Federal – $35B
4. SchoolsFirst – $31B …and 73 more over $10B each.
They offer the exact same products as Bank of America: 4.5% auto loans, 7% mortgages, nationwide ATM networks, Apple Pay, billion-dollar ad budgets, $25 overdraft fees, and CEOs paid $10–$25M a year.
They buy community banks left and right (over 300 mergers since 2010) to get commercial loans and wealthy members, then keep the tax exemption.
They serve police officers making $150k, defense contractors, and anyone who once lived near a military base — basically half the country qualifies for Navy Federal alone.

The money

Top 100 credit unions made $23B in net income in 2024 (NCUA data).
If taxed at the normal 21% corporate rate, that’s roughly $4.8B in federal tax.
JCT/Treasury 2025 estimate of the exemption: $3–4B annual revenue loss.
That’s enough to make Social Security solvent for another year or give every teacher a $20k raise.

The original justification is dead

1937: Credit unions were tiny, volunteer-run, served factory workers.
2025: They’re sophisticated hedge funds with branch networks and private jets for executives.

Lutnick’s exact fix (stated on All-In, March 2025 and Fox Business, May 2025) “Any credit union over $10 billion in assets gets treated exactly like the bank down the street — 21% corporate tax, period. Under $10B you keep the full exemption so the little guy still wins. That’s it. One sentence in the reconciliation bill. Raises $3–4B a year and ends the hypocrisy tomorrow.”

What happens if they cry “we’ll have to charge members more!” They already charge the same or higher fees than banks (2024 CFPB study). Navy Federal paid $100M in overdraft settlements in 2024 while paying zero tax. They have $25B in excess capital — they’ll be fine.

Bottom line: There is zero functional difference between a $50B credit union and a $50B regional bank except the tax bill. Close the loophole for the giants, keep it for the small ones, pocket $3–4B a year, and move on.

That’s literally how simple 90% of these fixes are. Want the one-sentence legislative text for this one (and the other 49)? Say go.

Unfair Competition Demands a United Front

Don’t Just Get Mad, Get Even: Why Unfair Competition Demands a United Front

You follow the rules. You pay your premiums, file your paperwork, and play fair. You invest in your team, carry the proper licenses, and ensure your business is covered with workers’ compensation insurance. So why does it feel like you’re being punished for it? Every time you submit a bid, you know you’re not just competing on skill and efficiency; you’re up against ghost competitors who operate in the shadows, and it’s costing you jobs. You’re not imagining it, and you’re not alone in your frustration.

The Unlevel Playing Field

When a competitor submits a bid that seems impossibly low, it’s not because they have a secret business method. It’s because they’re cheating. They build their business model on breaking the law, and every legitimate contractor pays the price.

Let’s break down the “advantage” an illegal operator has. While you are paying for the essential costs of doing business legally, they are simply pocketing the difference. These costs include:

Workers’ Compensation Insurance: Depending on the trade, this can add a significant percentage to your payroll costs. It’s a non-negotiable expense that protects your workers and your business, yet your illegal competitor treats it as optional.
Payroll Taxes: You pay your share of Social Security, Medicare, and state and federal unemployment taxes for every employee. By paying “cash under the table,” an illegal operator avoids this entirely, instantly giving them a massive price advantage.
Licensing and Bonds: You’ve invested the time and money to get licensed by the CSLB and carry the necessary bonds, proving your professionalism and providing a layer of consumer protection. They operate with none of these safeguards.
Liability Insurance: You carry liability insurance to protect your clients and your assets. It’s a fundamental part of responsible business ownership that they simply ignore.

When you add it all up, an illegal competitor can have 20% to 40% lower overhead before the job even starts. They aren’t more efficient; they’re just operating illegally. This isn’t fair competition. It’s theft—theft from their workers, from the government, and directly from your bottom line.

A Powerful, Overlooked Tool

For too long, honest contractors have felt helpless, believing that reporting these operators to overwhelmed state agencies is their only recourse. But there is a powerful and direct tool designed for this exact situation: California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL).

Found in the Business and Professions Code § 17200, the UCL is a broad statute that prohibits any “unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice.” The key word here is unlawful. When a competitor operates without a required license or fails to carry legally mandated workers’ compensation insurance, they are, by definition, committing an unlawful business act.

The UCL allows businesses that have been harmed and have lost money as a result of this illegal competition to take direct legal action. It’s not just about consumer rights; it’s about business rights. It gives you the standing to sue a competitor whose illegal shortcuts are directly taking business away from you. Think of it as a rule that says you can’t win a race by taking a shortcut that’s off-limits to every other runner. The UCL is the referee that can penalize them for it.

The Power of Alliance

So, if this powerful tool exists, why isn’t every honest contractor using it? The answer is simple: fighting alone is daunting, expensive, and time-consuming. Hiring attorneys and building a legal case against a single competitor can cost tens of thousands of dollars with no guarantee of success. For a small business, it’s a risk that’s often too great to take on.

This is precisely why the Workers’ Rights Compliance Alliance was formed.

We are a non-profit association founded on a simple principle: there is strength in numbers. Instead of one small business trying to fight a systemic problem alone, the Alliance pools resources from its members to create a dedicated legal fund. We work with legal experts to identify clear-cut cases of unfair competition and take targeted legal action on behalf of all our members.

By joining forces, we transform an impossible individual fight into a manageable and powerful collective action. Your modest membership fee combines with others to create a war chest that illegal operators cannot ignore. We handle the legal legwork, reducing your individual risk and allowing you to focus on what you do best—running your business.

Stop Feeling Helpless. Start Fighting Back.

The frustration you feel every time you lose a bid to an illegal operator is justified. But frustration alone won’t change anything. The cycle of unfair competition will continue as long as honest contractors feel isolated and powerless. It’s time to change the dynamic.

You don’t have to accept this as the cost of doing business anymore. You have the law on your side, and now, you have an alliance ready to fight with you. It’s time to level the playing field.

Visit https://workersrightscompliancealliance.com/ to learn how to join the fight. Don’t just get mad. Get even.

Snake oil

Commissioner Lara issues Cease and Desist to Innovative Partners and multiple other entities for scheme involving sale of misleading health insurance Consumers who have purchased policies from Innovative Partners encouraged to call Department of Insurance for assistance

SACRAMENTO – Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a Cease and Desist Order against Innovative Partners, LP for illegally acting as an insurance company in California and providing health coverage without proper certification. The Department also has served 10 additional Cease and Desist Orders on multiple entities as well as licensed and unlicensed individuals that aided and abetted Innovative Partners, LP in these fraudulent activities.
“We will use every tool at our disposal to protect consumers,” said Commissioner Lara. “When Californians purchase health coverage they deserve the full confidence the coverage they are promised will be there when they need it. Selling insurance without the proper licensing or certification is against the law and puts consumers health and financial well-being at risk.” The Department launched an investigation after receiving information that California consumers were having their claims improperly denied after purchasing and attempting to use health coverage sponsored by Innovative Partners, LP (Innovative Partners). The investigation found that beginning in 2023, Innovative Partners defrauded victims by selling them limited or non-existent health coverage and convincing them they were purchasing comprehensive insurance plans. Many of these victims believed they were speaking with representatives from Covered California and purchasing comprehensive Blue Shield or Aetna policies. However, when the victims attempted to use their coverage, they found the coverage was limited or non-existent and would not cover the medical expenses they were told were covered with their policy.
Innovative Partners is not partnered with Covered California. Upon purchasing health coverage, consumers were given plan cards with Innovative Partners branding. These cards often listed PHCS and Group Resources as claim handlers, while some cards also listed portal information for First Health Network and/or Marpai Administrators LLC. Other plan cards also included Teladoc Health Inc. contact information.
Consumers also experienced issues with lack of coverage for medical benefits they were promised. For example, one consumer signed up for a policy they were told was an Aetna Gold PPO plan through Innovative Partners which would cover his mental health appointments, and could start immediately without a waiting period. He received an ID card which included First Health Network and Marpai Health portal information. The consumer visited his therapist twice, and was then told that the insurance was not covering the care. After contacting both of the numbers on the back of the card he was given, a representative assured him he did have coverage for mental health. Trusting what the representative told him, he continued with his mental health treatments believing he did have coverage, but Innovative never paid for the treatment and the consumer was left with more than $1,700 in unpaid medical bills.
In another case, a small business owner was looking to purchase new health insurance after his business slowed causing him to become ineligible for his prior coverage. The consumer stated that the issue began after he tried to purchase a policy through Covered California and gave up due to cost. He then received a call from Innovative Partners who claimed that the consumer qualified for their plan due to his low income, and he would receive full coverage for $400 per month. Upon signing up, the consumer specifically asked about E.R. visits and was told that the plan covered up to two visits, per year, with a $50 co-pay. The consumer confirmed coverage with two separate Innovative Partners representatives and thereafter visited the E.R. using his Innovative policy. The consumer discovered that the represented coverage did not exist when he started receiving calls from collections agencies, and he was left with around $11,000 in debt.
Innovative Partners disguised their activities as a single-employer health insurance plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, masking the sale and selling of health insurance as a “Small Employee Benefit Plan” even though the consumers did not claim to be employees of or partners with Innovative Partners.
Innovative Partners does not have authorization to transact insurance in California and does not hold a certificate of authority to transact business in California.
Consumers who have purchased health coverage through Innovative Partners, LP or any of the below entities or licensed and unlicensed individuals should contact the Department of Insurance at (714) 712-7600.
Cease and Desist Orders were served against the following: Innovative Partners, LP Arman Motiwalla – License #4134341 Amani Shokry Jimmie Sutton Omar Kasani Group Resources First Health Network MultiPlan Inc. PHCS Marpai Administrators LLC Teledoc Health Inc.

Real Estate and Rental Agencies Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Revised July 2008

This fact sheet provides general information concerning the application of the FLSA to real estate and rental agencies.

Characteristics

A real estate/rental agency is one which represents both in-state and out-of-state clients in negotiating the purchase or sale of property within the State in which the broker is located, or negotiates for the purchase or sale of property in other states, or collects or remits rents or other monies for property owners.

Coverage

Employees of real estate/rental agencies are individually covered by the Act if they regularly engage in work which is considered to be interstate commerce. This includes, for example, handling goods coming in from outside the state or which will be sent outside the state either by direct shipment or by a customer. Clerical and janitorial employees whose work is closely related and directly essential to such interstate operations are also covered, as are employees regularly engaged in interstate communication by telephone, telegraph, or the mails.

An enterprise is defined in the FLSA to mean the related activities performed, either through unified operation or common control, by any person or persons for a common business purpose. The FLSA applies to enterprises that have employees who are engaged in interstate commerce, produce, handle, sell, or work on goods that have been moved in or produced for interstate commerce, have $500,000 in annual business volume, are named in the FLSA. Covered non exempt employees must be paid in accordance with requirements of the FLSA.

In determining the annual business volume, gross receipts from rental property owned and gross fees from rental property managed should be included. Gross receipts from the sale of property and property insurance should also be included.

Requirements

The FLSA requires the payment of the Federal minimum wage to covered non-exempt employees and overtime pay at a rate of not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay after 40 hours of work in a workweek. Wages required by FLSA are due on the regular payday for each pay period. Employers are required to keep records containing information specified in the regulations (29 CFR Part 516

The FLSA youth employment regulations forbid the employment of minors under 14, restrict the hours of work and certain occupations for 14 & 15 year olds, and forbid the employment of 16 & 17 year olds in hazardous occupations.

Exemptions from various provisions of the FLSA are provided for employees who meet certain requirements. Among the employees who may be exempt from minimum wage and overtime pay are executive, administrative, professional, and outside sales employees. Each of these categories of employee must meet specified requirements before the exemption may be applied.

Typical Problems

Some problems and misconceptions which Wage and Hour investigations commonly find in this type of business are:

Employees being charged for meals, lodging, and other facilities which are actually furnished for the benefit of the employer.
Employees being charged full retail cost for facilities furnished for their benefit. They may only be charged actual cost.
Improper computation of gross business volume. With respect to the sale of any property or commodity (such as insurance) or the rental of property owned by the employer, gross receipts are counted in determining business volume. In the rental of property owned by someone else, only the commission paid is counted in the gross business volume.

Palantir, Nvidia, SoFi, and Tesla

In this analysis, we explore the projected performance of four prominent stocks—Palantir, Nvidia, SoFi, and Tesla—amidst concerns over tariffs and recession fears. The commentary provides insight into recent developments for each company and discusses investment strategies based on current market conditions.

Outline

Introduction
Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
- Current Stock Performance
- Recent Developments
- Earnings Outlook
- Investment Strategy
Nvidia Corporation (NVDA)
- Stock Volatility and Market Position
- Revenue Impact from China
- Strategic Insights
- Investment Stance
SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)
- Business Overview and Market Capitalization
- Revenue Growth and Profitability
- Customer Growth Strategy
- Long-term Outlook
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
- Upcoming Earnings Report
- Stock Stability and Market Operations
- Global Expansion Initiatives
- Investment Perspective
Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR)
- Recent Funding and Financial Position
- Market Developments
- Future Outlook
Conclusion

Key Insights

This video offers a robust examination of stock performance in relation to macroeconomic factors. The analysis emphasizes a proactive investment approach centered on understanding each company’s fundamentals and market dynamics.

1. Introduction

The video serves as an investment briefing focused on four stocks likely to be affected by upcoming economic conditions, particularly relating to tariffs and fears of recession. The presenter aims to provide insights based purely on research and relevant developments without the distractions of master classes or webinars.

2. Palantir Technologies (PLTR)

Current Stock Performance

Palantir is currently priced at $93.50 and has shown resilience amidst market volatility, effectively bouncing back from a low of around $75. The stock’s upward trajectory suggests a strong support level at $75, with a potential resistance point near $100.

Recent Developments

A significant announcement from NATO on April 14 regarding the acquisition of Palantir’s Maven Smart System—the AI-enabled military platform—has contributed positively to the stock, resulting in a 5% increase post-announcement. The potential earnings growth is significant, as Palantir has also begun collaborations with the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency to develop a unified API for the IRS.

Additionally, Palantir enhanced its AIP on April 10, allowing customers to integrate their own AI models into the Foundry system. This improvement could yield new revenue opportunities.

Earnings Outlook

Palantir is set to release its first-quarter 2025 earnings on May 5, 2025. Given the stock’s recent resilience, an optimistic earnings report could further elevate the stock price, while any significant pre-earnings sell-off could reflect typical market volatility.

Investment Strategy

The presenter expresses a bullish perspective on Palantir, seeing a potential entry point for investors under $90 per share, and suggests selling puts as a strategy to capitalize on price movement leading into earnings.

3. Nvidia Corporation (NVDA)

Stock Volatility and Market Position

Currently trading just above $101, Nvidia has experienced significant volatility, with stocks moving from $94 to over $110 before stabilizing. The market’s perception is influenced by external factors, such as revenue potential from China.

Revenue Impact from China

Nvidia faces challenges stemming from the U.S.’s export restrictions on advanced chips to China. While this market accounts for only about 10% of revenue, the nature of the blockade poses serious concerns for future growth and cash flow.

Strategic Insights

Despite this blockade, Nvidia has reduced its reliance on the Chinese market over the past few quarters, fostering a more robust outlook. The stock is perceived as reasonably priced, and the present valuation appears attractive for potential buyers.

Investment Stance

The presenter remains bullish on Nvidia, planning to invest substantially at the current levels, given the rapid market reaction to troubling news, which may already be factored into the current stock price.

4. SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)

Business Overview and Market Capitalization

SoFi operates with a market cap of $12 billion, positioning itself for potential rapid growth. The stock recently exceeded $11, indicating a recovery phase post-major losses.

Revenue Growth and Profitability

In 2024, SoFi achieved impressive financial milestones, reporting a 26% revenue increase year-over-year and reaching its first profitable year. Guidance for 2025 is modest but reflects optimism for growth.

Customer Growth Strategy

SoFi is projected to add approximately 2.8 million members in 2025, enhancing customer lifetime value through its upsell model, where existing customers are encouraged to use more products.

Long-term Outlook

The growth strategy and holistic financial service model position SoFi for significant upward movement, especially as it aims to convert acquired customers into long-term users of multiple offered services, ultimately increasing overall profitability.

5. Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

Upcoming Earnings Report

Tesla’s earnings are scheduled for April 22, 2025. However, the stock has displayed stable performance during a range-bound period, which suggests potential for covering put sales and related investment strategies.

Stock Stability and Market Operations

With strong support at approximately $226, Tesla’s recent operational launch in Saudi Arabia aims to enhance its footprint in a rapidly growing market for electric vehicles.

Global Expansion Initiatives

Tesla’s strategic investment into the Saudi market reflects an intention to capture growing demand amidst competition. The Saudi Vision 2030 initiative aligns with Tesla’s goals, indicating a favorable backdrop for potential sales boosts.

Investment Perspective

The current sentiment suggests that maintaining investments in Tesla via dollar-cost averaging could be beneficial, particularly as competition increases and new markets open.

6. Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR)

Recent Funding and Financial Position

In February, Archer raised $300 million, enhancing liquidity and positioning itself for growth in the emerging eVTOL market.

Market Developments

Despite encountering market volatility, Archer’s advancements in electric vertical takeoff and landing technologies speak to its innovative edge and future potential within the aviation market.

Future Outlook

The upcoming period appears promising for Archer as it continues to secure funding and develop its offerings in the eVTOL sector.

7. Conclusion

The analysis lays a foundation for strategic investment choices in Palantir, Nvidia, SoFi, Tesla, and Archer, emphasizing a proactive approach tailored to the evolving market landscape. Each stock presents unique opportunities and risks, underscoring the importance of informed decision-making amid economic uncertainties. Ultimately, the video’s narrative encourages viewers to adopt prudent investment strategies designed to adapt to market fluctuations and capitalize on growth potential.

Summary

In this video, the speaker evaluates the stock performance of Palantir Technologies, Nvidia, SoFi, Tesla, and Archer as they navigate concerns over tariffs and recession fears. The analysis includes insights into upcoming earnings reports, stock volatility, market strategies, and bullish perspectives on these stocks, underscoring a focus on strategic investments amid fluctuating market conditions.

Highlights

Palantir Technologies has shown resilience with a recent stock price increase.
Nvidia is experiencing volatility due to external pressures, mainly from regulatory actions affecting its China market.
SoFi is projected for significant growth, backed by strong revenue performance and a comprehensive upsell strategy.
Tesla continues to stabilize, entering into new markets in Saudi Arabia.
Archer demonstrates potential growth opportunities following a successful capital raise.

Key Insights

Palantir Technologies
- Current Price Trends: Trading around $93.50 after recovering from a low of $75. Palantir’s stock is projected to rise further, bolstered by positive developments.
- Recent Acquisitions: Significant news includes NATO’s acquisition of Palantir’s Maven Smart System, enhancing battlefield operations using AI. This boosted the stock by 5%.
- Government Contracts: Collaboration with the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency aims to develop a centralized API for the IRS, highlighting Palantir’s growing governmental ties.
- AI Enhancements: Introduction of enhancements to their AIP will facilitate custom integrations for clients, showcasing the company’s commitment to innovation in data management.
- Earnings Expectations: Anticipation for a strong first-quarter earnings report, casting the stock as a good pre-earnings buy. Current support at $75 is strong, with resistance seen around $98.
Nvidia
- Stock Performance: Currently priced over $101, Nvidia has experienced substantial volatility, with concerns stemming from shifting markets and geopolitical pressures.
- Revenue Risks: Challenges arise from restrictions on the sale of AI chips to China, impacting previous revenue streams, although the stock’s previous price has already factored in these risks.
- Investment Positioning: The speaker is bullish on Nvidia, indicating readiness to invest significantly amid the prevailing uncertainties. The current pricing strategy of selling puts at the $100 mark reflects confidence in recovery.
- Market Sentiment: Despite the blockade on revenue from China, Nvidia’s strategic shifts have reduced reliance on this market, positioning the company favorably for long-term growth.
SoFi
- Growth Trajectory: With ambitions to grow its membership base significantly in 2025, SoFi is currently trading around $11 and aims to expand its services to deepen customer relationships.
- Financial Milestones: The transition to profitability is highlighted by a 26% year-over-year increase in revenue, indicating robust business health.
- Upsell Strategy: Focuses on creating value through diverse financial services under one roof, thus enhancing customer lifetime value—an essential factor for growth.
- Earnings Outlook: The next earnings report is highly anticipated, with hopes of continued upward momentum in the stock’s performance expected post-announcement.
Tesla
- Upcoming Earnings: Set to report on April 22, projections show that Tesla’s stock has stabilized recently after periods of volatility.
- International Expansion: Startup operations in Saudi Arabia reflect strategic growth initiatives aligned with future market sustainability and expansion efforts in the electric vehicle sector.
- Market Strategies: Investor sentiment appears positive as Tesla adapts to competition while taking substantial steps toward wider market penetration.
- Valuation Indicators: Significant volume in purchases suggests a growing belief in Tesla’s future potential, recommending it as a buy or hold position amid a dollar-cost-averaging strategy.
ArcherPalantir, Nvidia, SoFi, and Tesla
- Capital Development: A recent capital infusion of $300 million bolsters the company’s financial footing, aiding in the development of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) technologies.
- Stock Positioning: The speaker highlights a proactive investment approach through selling puts and taking on additional contracts as the company’s strategies unfold.
- Future Growth: Despite market fluctuations, Archer’s strategic direction indicates promise for long-term growth potential.

Core Concepts

Market Volatility: Understanding and acting on market volatility are crucial for investment strategy formulation, especially in tech-driven sectors.
Crisis Preparedness: Companies that can pivot in response to tariffs and other regulatory hurdles appear more equipped for future profitability.
Long-Term Investment: The emphasis is on sustaining investments in companies seen as having transformative growth potentials, despite short-term fluctuations.
Earnings Reports: The upcoming earnings reports are pivotal for investor sentiment, setting the stage for potential stock rebounds.

Keywords

Market Volatility
Earnings Reports
Upsell Strategy
Investment Strategy
Electric Vehicles

FAQs

Why is Palantir expected to perform well in 2025?
- Palantir is expected to benefit from significant government contracts and new AI platform enhancements, alongside strong market support.
What are the main concerns affecting Nvidia?
- Nvidia faces revenue pressures due to U.S. restrictions impacting its sales opportunities in China, but it has reduced reliance on this market over time.
How is SoFi planning to increase its customer base?
- SoFi’s strategy includes an aggressive upsell model to enhance customer lifetime value while expanding its existing member base significantly.
What does Tesla’s expansion into Saudi Arabia signify?
- Tesla’s operations in Saudi Arabia indicate a strategic move towards capturing new markets while aligning with sustainable energy initiatives like Vision 2030.
What developments is Archer focusing on?
- Archer is concentrating on advanced electric vehicle technologies, supported by a strong financial backing to enhance growth trajectories in the eVTOL sector.

Light Money on fire!

In this video, the host, an average investor, recounts a tumultuous day of trading involving selling covered calls and shares their personal experiences and the emotional challenges faced during a volatile market swing. The turning point occurred when a surprise announcement from President Trump about a pause on tariffs caused the market to surge unexpectedly. The narrative focuses on the mistakes made when rolling covered calls, analyzing the consequences of the decisions taken amid sudden price shifts. The investor emphasizes the importance of having a strategy and adhering to rules, particularly during unpredictable market conditions, while encouraging viewers to share their own experiences in the comments.

Highlights

📈 Unforeseen Market Dynamics: A market surge after an unexpected announcement created panic for covered call sellers.
🎢 Volatility Impact: Implied volatility fluctuations can drastically affect option strategies.
🤔 Decision-Making Challenges: The emotional aspect of trading is highlighted as investors struggle to stick to strategies in turbulent market conditions.
🤑 Rolling Strategies: The investor discusses various rolling strategies and their impact on overall performance.
📊 Portfolio Performance: A mix of net debits showcases the complexities of managing a trading portfolio amidst volatility.
📉 Emotional Resilience: The need for emotional control is stressed, especially when facing unexpected market changes.
🗨️ Viewer Engagement: The host invites viewer feedback, aiming to develop a community discussion around trading experiences.

Key Insights

📊 Market Surprises Can Be Costly: The host experienced a severe loss due to a sudden market upturn driven by external factors. This underscores the unpredictability of financial markets and how external news can impact investment strategies instantaneously.
🔄 Importance of Rolling Strategies: The options strategy of rolling covered calls can lead to unexpected outcomes. The analysis of different strike prices reveals that sticking with a previous position (holding the line) could have been more beneficial than rolling further away from the original strike price.
⚖️ Emotional Decision-Making: The trader highlights the critical role emotions play in investing. When markets change rapidly, even experienced traders can find it difficult to adhere to their established rules and strategies, leading to regrettable decisions.
🤔 Benefits of Diligence with Covered Calls: Despite the chaos on that trading day, selling covered calls usually proves to be a strategy that benefits investors. However, this incident reveals the necessity of maintaining a consistent approach even when faced with adverse conditions.
📉 The Importance of a Trading Plan: The video emphasizes that having a predefined strategy is essential for navigating market volatility. The absence of a strong plan often leaves traders vulnerable to reckless decisions driven by fear or greed when unexpected events arise.
💰 Cash Flow Management: The investor’s cash flow figures and net debits demonstrate that successful trading requires balancing immediate gains against potential losses. Continuous monitoring of cash flow can help mitigate risks over time.
📅 Learning Opportunities from Mistakes: The experience is framed as a vital learning moment. It shows that every trading mistake can serve as a lesson, reinforcing best practices that traders should follow moving forward.

In summary, the video provides valuable insights into the complexities of selling covered calls and how market volatility can deeply affect individual trading strategies. It pushes the idea that emotional stability and strict adherence to trading rules can lead to better outcomes in challenging market environments. By sharing personal experiences, the host not only educates viewers about the realities of trading but also invites a collaborative discussion on best practices among fellow traders.Based on the provided text, several key conclusions and recommendations can be derived from the experience of the speaker regarding their strategies for selling covered calls during a period of extreme market volatility.

Key Conclusions:

Market Response to Events: The drastic rise in market prices due to an unexpected announcement underscores that external factors can significantly impact market dynamics. One moment the market appears stable, and the next, it can surge, leading to potentially unfavorable outcomes for options strategies.
Timing and Decision Making: There are numerous alternatives when managing covered calls; however, making decisions amid market disruptions can be particularly challenging. The speaker reflects on various rolling strategies illustrating that sometimes, acting conservatively might lead to better outcomes.
Emotional Influence on Trading Decisions: The emotional strain during high-volatility situations can cloud judgment and lead to less rational trading decisions. The speaker cites regret over not adhering to predetermined rules during this tumultuous time.
Profit and Loss Management: Despite experiencing a net debit due to poor decision-making, the speaker’s portfolio still performed relatively well. This highlights the importance of assessing overall portfolio performance rather than focusing solely on isolated transactions.
Learning from Experience: Every trading experience provides an opportunity to learn. The significant volatility faced in this instance serves as a lesson for better future decision-making and risk management strategies.

Recommendations:

Establish and Rigorously Follow Trading Rules: Having a set of rules for when to roll positions or hold them can provide a framework for making decisions, especially during emotional times. The speaker emphasizes the importance of adhering to these rules even when faced with unexpected market movements.
Consider Sitting on the Sidelines: There are times when being inactive in the market may be the wisest choice. The speaker suggests there’s no shame in avoiding trades during particularly volatile periods.
Evaluate Expected Income Structures: Traders should reassess their expectations and limits regarding income from selling calls. Maintaining modest income goals could prevent overextending oneself into larger risks that could lead to significant loss.
Regularly Reassess Strategies: As market conditions change, it’s essential to reevaluate strategies to ensure they remain relevant. This includes analyzing how previous moves could have been better handled with the benefit of hindsight.
Engage with Combined Learning: Community engagement can help broaden perspectives on risk management strategies. Sharing experiences and learning from others can equip traders with diverse viewpoints on handling extreme market fluctuations.

In summary, the narrative illustrates the complexity of trading strategies like covered calls in volatile environments and emphasizes the necessity for well-founded rules, a cautious approach to market engagement, and the opportunity for growth from challenging trading experiences.

1. How might external factors like economic indicators or geopolitical events specifically alter one’s strategy for selling covered calls during periods of volatility?

NoteGPT

External factors, such as economic indicators and geopolitical events, can significantly influence one’s strategy for selling covered calls, particularly during periods of heightened market volatility. The text highlights how a sudden announcement from President Trump led to an unexpected surge in market prices, demonstrating the unpredictable nature of financial markets. The speaker’s experience provides insight into how such events can alter trading strategies.

Impact of Economic Indicators:

Market Sentiment Shifts: Economic indicators, such as unemployment rates, GDP growth, or inflation metrics, can sway investor sentiment. A positive economic report might lead to a bullish market, making previously set strike prices feel inadequate. In this scenario, sellers of covered calls might encounter increasing volatility, requiring them to reassess their positions more frequently.
Volatility Adjustments: High implied volatility can drive premium prices for options, which can make selling covered calls more attractive. However, if unexpected economic data emerges and shifts the market quickly, the volatility assumptions may no longer hold, forcing traders to consider more conservative strategies, such as lowering strike prices or rolling to different options to mitigate potential losses.

Influence of Geopolitical Events:

Sudden Market Movements: As described in the text, the announcement of a 90-day pause on tariffs triggered a rapid market increase. Such geopolitical events can cause immediate market reactions that are difficult to predict, leading traders to scramble to adjust their strategies in real time. This necessitates a more agile approach to trading, as quick adjustments often become paramount.
Risk Management Enhancements: Geopolitical instability can increase overall market uncertainty and risk. Traders may choose to mitigate risk by selecting more conservative strike prices for covered calls or by implementing strategies that allow them to maintain greater liquidity. In such circumstances, sitting on the sidelines temporarily may prove beneficial rather than making hasty decisions that could amplify losses.

Adaptability of Strategy:

Rolling Strategies: The speaker contemplated various strategies, such as rolling existing positions to different strike prices based on market conditions. More frequently, traders might need to adapt their rolling strategies in light of unexpected events, prompting reassessment of potential roll outcomes as market conditions evolve rapidly.
Psychological Factors: Finally, external factors also heighten emotional responses to market changes. The speaker expressed feelings of regret for not sticking to a plan amid shock at rising prices. Having defined rules for trading helps combat emotional decisions, which can lead to suboptimal outcomes during volatile times induced by external factors. Strategies should include guidelines on emotional management and decision-making processes to help traders adhere to their original plans.

In summary, economic indicators and geopolitical events can dramatically shift market dynamics, prompting covered call sellers to adapt their strategies. Being responsive to these alterations, employing risk management techniques, and maintaining emotional discipline are essential for success in trading, especially during heightened periods of market volatility.

what about covering with puts

NoteGPT

Covering with puts is a strategy that involves using put options to hedge against potential losses while holding a portfolio of stocks, thereby providing a protective mechanism, especially in volatile market conditions. This contrasts with selling covered calls, which generates income from premiums received but can expose the investor to losses if the stock price significantly increases. Here are some considerations regarding covering with puts based on the context of the provided text content.

Understanding the Strategy:

Hedging Against Downside Risk: By purchasing puts, investors can protect their stock holdings from declining prices. If the market experiences a downturn, the put options gain value, offsetting the losses incurred in the underlying stock. In the volatile scenario described, where market prices spiked rapidly, having puts could allow for greater peace of mind, as they would act as a safety net during unexpected market swings.
Complementary to Covered Calls: Selling covered calls generates income but does not protect against downturns. Conversely, combining this strategy with puts can enhance the overall risk management framework. While generated premiums from selling calls can help cushion losses, puts can further enhance protection against sharp drops in stock price—potentially offering a balanced approach during uncertain economic or geopolitical climates.
Managing Implied Volatility: Implied volatility typically influences options pricing. During high volatility periods, put premiums can be more expensive, but they could be valuable in protecting against larger price swings. The example described in the text illustrates a significant market jump due to an external announcement, demonstrating how swiftly sentiment can shift. A proactive approach to buying puts during such periods might allow investors to capitalize on increased volatility by locking in protection even when stock valuations are rising.

Strategic Adjustments:

Dynamic Adjustments Based on Market Conditions: The speaker’s experience emphasizes the importance of flexibility in strategy. Instead of relying solely on selling covered calls or on managing existing positions, an investor might alternately consider adding puts strategically to form a well-rounded approach. Adjustments can be driven by market indicators, demand for protection, and personal risk tolerance.
Reassessing Strike Prices and Expiration Dates: When employing put options, choosing the right strike price and expiration date is crucial. They should align with the investor’s risk management ethos and expectations about the underlying stock’s performance. A well-timed purchase of puts could mitigate losses and create opportunities for near-term gains depending on the volatility of market conditions.
Evaluating Emotional Responses: The emotional aspect of trading is highlighted in the text, particularly when unexpected market movements occur. Selling puts alongside calls offers a more comprehensive risk appetite, which can alleviate stress during market fluctuations. Knowing there is a hedge in place can contribute to a more rational decision-making process during emotional moments.

Cost-Benefit Analysis:

Premium Paid for Puts: While puts offer protection, they come at a cost. Investors should weigh the protection they provide against the premiums paid. During high volatility, these costs may be substantial, which can impact the overall profitability when combined with options strategies.
Long-Term vs. Short-Term Strategies: Consideration of long-term strategies versus short-term positions also plays a role in whether to employ puts. Long periods of volatility may warrant more extensive hedges, while short-term swings can perhaps rely solely on covered call strategies or holding positions without additional hedges.

In conclusion, covering with puts represents a viable strategy for managing risk while engaged in selling covered calls. It not only provides protective measures against adverse movements in stock prices but also facilitates more informed decision-making during turbulent market conditions. A thoughtful integration of these strategies can help balance income generation while offering a safeguard against downside risks, ultimately enriching an investor’s toolkit in navigating complex market environments.

what about buying 18 month longputs deep in the money and selling weekly call all premium for income and o risk

NoteGPT

Buying long puts that are deep in-the-money while simultaneously selling weekly call options can present a unique opportunities for generating income with reduced risk exposure. This strategy entails establishing a protective insurance policy on the underlying asset (through the long puts) while attempting to earn income from the premiums received by selling calls. Here’s an in-depth look at how this approach may work, along with considerations to keep in mind.

Mechanics of the Strategy

Deep In-the-Money Long Puts:
- Purchasing deep in-the-money puts provides substantial intrinsic value, acting as a strong hedge against the decline in the underlying assets’ price. If the market experiences negative movements—similar to the drastic jumps noted in the text when the market moved 11-12% in one day—the long puts would gain significant value, thereby protecting the overall portfolio.
- The extended duration of 18 months on these puts provides ample time to benefit from protection amidst certain adverse market conditions or events, allowing for adjusted strategies over an extended period without the pressure of short-term expiration dates.
Selling Weekly Calls:
- Selling weekly calls can generate income through the premiums received, creating a consistent cash flow. The attractiveness of selling calls lies primarily in the opportunity for regular income generation, allowing the investor to capitalize on upward price movements in the underlying asset to gather additional funds.
- In conjunction with long puts, this approach can provide a balanced risk-reward scenario. While the long puts protect against significant downward movements, the income generated from selling calls can offset the costs of buying the puts and potentially enhance profitability.

Risk Management

Limiting Downside Exposure:
- The puts serve to limit downside risk. If the market responds unpredictably, like the abrupt market shift recounted in the example—where the speaker’s position may have been adversely affected—holding a put option enables the investor to sell the stock at a predetermined price, thereby preventing further losses.
- This is particularly important in volatile markets, as the shock of sudden economic announcements, as seen in the speaker’s scenario, can lead to significant movements that would otherwise adversely affect an investor lacking protective hedges.
Capping Upside Potential:
- While the strategy allows for potential premiums, it does cap potential upside gains. If the underlying asset appreciates beyond the strike price of the sold calls, the investor may miss out on further appreciation. However, with a strategic approach to selecting call strike prices—ideally placing them at levels above expected resistance—the upside can be limited while still capturing gains.

Emotional and Strategic Considerations

Emotional Discipline:
- Like the challenges faced by the speaker—where emotional decision-making clouded judgment—this strategy necessitates maintaining discipline and sticking to predetermined rules. Emotional reactions to market fluctuations can lead to hasty decisions, such as selling or rolling positions that may be counterproductive in the long run.
Selecting the Right Strike Prices:
- Investors must carefully assess and choose the strike prices for the puts and calls. The selected strikes should align with market forecasts, but they should also allow for a margin of safety while leveraging income potential. This requires careful analysis of market indicators and volatility to accurately gauge potential movements.
Frequent Monitoring and Adjustments:
- Given market unpredictability, continuous monitoring of the positions is essential. The exemplified volatility can require quick adjustments to strike prices on sold calls or rolling puts based on market performance. Maintaining flexibility and being informed about market news is critical to optimizing this strategy.

Conclusion

In summary, buying long puts that are deep in-the-money and selling weekly calls can form an effective strategy to generate income while managing risk. This approach leverages the upside from premiums while providing robust protection against downside risks. However, it’s vital to conduct continuous monitoring of market conditions, maintain emotional discipline, and implement well-planned strike price strategies to fully realize the potential of this dual-option trading strategy. The key lies in balancing the income potential against the risks involved, enabling a more secure trading approach amidst market fluctuations.

High-yield investment funds

In this analysis of high-yield investment funds, the author discusses various business development companies (BDCs) and income-generating funds, highlighting their performance and yield. The focus is on the Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXL) and its performance compared to other BDCs, as well as Funds such as PBDC, RQI, PFFA, and MLPA that invest in other income-generating sectors like real estate investment trusts (REITs) and preferred stocks. The piece emphasizes the benefits of diversified investment strategies and the importance of monitoring market conditions when considering investments in these funds.

Highlights

BXL has outperformed with a total return of 28% and a yield above 10%.
PBDC allows investors to gain exposure to 21 actively managed BDCs, outperforming the S&P 500 since inception.
REIT RQI offers over an 8% yield but has a history of fluctuating distributions.
PFFA is a preferred stock fund yielding almost 10%, providing stability even during market downturns.
MLPA provides exposure to midstream energy companies, which consistently pay distributions.
Closed-end funds like CFS yield above 8%, but their fees may affect returns.
The author emphasizes diversification in high-yield sectors to better manage risk.

Key Insights

BXL’s Performance: The performance of the Blackstone Secured Lending Fund suggests that actively managed funds can yield higher returns compared to a passive investment in BDCs. The 28% total return reflects not only price appreciation but also income generated from dividends.
PBDC’s Strategy: PBDC stands apart from other BDC funds due to its active management approach, which allows the fund manager to adapt to market changes and focus on undervalued securities, thereby yielding better returns throughout its inception.
Challenges with REITs: The historical performance of RQI illustrates the impact of economic downturns on dividends, revealing the risk that comes attached to real estate investments, especially in times of high interest rates.
Preferred Stocks Stability: Preferred stocks, as exemplified by PFFA, can provide better stability in dividend distributions, making them attractive to income-focused investors, despite their sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Midstream Sector Opportunities: Investing in midstream companies via MLPA allows investors to partake in the stable income generated by oil and gas transportation and processing without direct exposure to commodity price volatility.
Fees of Fund of Funds: CFS’s structure as a fund of funds comes with inherent fees that could diminish returns, encouraging individual stock selection in closed-end funds for potentially higher net gains.
Diversification Importance: The author advocates for diversification through various income-generating securities, emphasizing better risk management and exposure to multiple revenue streams in a fluctuating economy.

Outline

Introduction
- Overview of investment environment and fund evaluations.
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXL)
- Performance metrics: 28% total return and over 10% yield.
PBDC Fund
- Actively managed strategy focusing on BDCs.
- Comparison to passive funds like BIZD.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
- Analyzing RQI’s yield and historical distribution challenges.
- Market considerations with regard to interest rates.
Preferred Stock Funds
- Discussing PFFA and its favorable dividend environment amid market volatility.
Midstream Investment
- Analysis of MLPA’s yield and its significance in an oil and gas market context.
Closed-End Funds Evaluation
- Discussion on CFS and the implications of management fees.
Conclusion
- Recap of key investment strategies and encouragement to diversify within high-yield sectors.

Keywords

Business Development Company (BDC)
Yield
Active Management
Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT)
Preferred Stock
Midstream
Closed-End Fund

FAQs

Q1: What is the performance of the Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXL)?
A1: BXL has provided a 28% total return over the past year with a yield of over 10%.
Q2: How does PBDC differ from BIZD?
A2: PBDC is actively managed, focusing on undervalued BDCs, while BIZD is a passive index fund.
Q3: What challenges do REITs face in the current market?
A3: REITs face challenges with fluctuating interest rates that impact their distribution capabilities, as well as historical performance issues during economic downturns.
Q4: Why are preferred stocks considered stable investments?
A4: Preferred stocks, like those in PFFA, often maintain consistent dividends even during market downturns, providing more security for investors.
Q5: What are the risks associated with closed-end funds?
A5: Closed-end funds may have high management fees that can reduce returns, particularly when invested in funds of funds.

Core Concepts

Investment Strategies in Income Funds: Investors looking for high-yield opportunities can benefit from a diversified approach towards business development companies, real estate investment trusts, preferred stocks, midstream companies, and closed-end funds. The key to maximizing income and managing risk is to choose actively managed funds, monitor interest rate impacts, and capitalize on favorable market conditions.
Performance Versus Stability: Investments like BXL and PBDC indicate the importance of active management in achieving superior return potential. However, investments in sectors like REITs and preferred stocks highlight the trade-off between yield stability and market risk.
Role of Interest Rates: The relationship between interest rates and security pricing is crucial, particularly for preferred stocks and REITs, where rising rates can lead to declining valuations and reduced income.
Tax Considerations: When investing in certain sectors, investors should also consider tax implications, such as K1 forms from MLPs, which can complicate tax reporting.

By understanding these core concepts and insights, investors can make more informed decisions in selecting high-yield income-generating investments that align with their financial objectives and market outlook.

Arbor Realty fake news cost 10%

On March 14th, a short seller report from Ninji Research accused Arbor Realty Trust of fraudulent practices, causing its stock price to drop over 10%. The report is lengthy, lacking a clear author and conclusion, which raises concerns about its credibility. It includes numerous allegations about Arbor’s financial practices, including claims of “fake revenue” and “fake holding companies.” Arbor Realty responded by stating the report is misleading and inaccurate, asserting their adherence to proper accounting principles. Despite the allegations, Arbor’s CEO purchased over $100,000 worth of stock shortly after the report, signaling confidence in the company. The video discusses the implications of the report, the market context, and offers a personal investment perspective.

Highlights

Ninji Research accuses Arbor Realty of fraud in a report released on March 14th.
The report caused a 10% drop in Arbor Realty’s stock price immediately after release.
It lacks a clear author and conclusion, raising questions about its credibility.
The report’s allegations include references to “fake revenue” and questions regarding their accounting practices.
Arbor Realty asserts that the report is full of inaccuracies and defamatory claims.
The CEO of Arbor Realty bought over $100,000 worth of stock the day after the report’s release, suggesting confidence in the company’s future.
The report’s timing coincides with general market fears related to banking and finance.

Key Insights

Lack of Credibility of Source: The absence of an identifiable author behind the Ninji Research report suggests potential motivations that may not align with genuine market analysis. This raises significant red flags for investors reliant on credible information sources.
Market Reaction: The immediate decline in Arbor Realty’s share price highlights how vulnerable stocks are to negative news, especially in a tumultuous market atmosphere where investor sentiment can quickly be swayed by fear.
Response by Arbor Realty: The company’s strong rebuttal to the report indicates confidence in its operational integrity and suggests they are committed to transparently refuting baseless claims. This could reassure shareholders and help in restoring market confidence.
Lack of Conclusion in the Report: The abrupt end of the report without a definitive conclusion or summary may be indicative of a deliberate strategy to generate confusion rather than a thorough critique, pushing investors into panic selling.
CEO’s Stock Purchase: The CEO’s decision to buy more stock amid the controversy signals a strong vote of confidence in the company’s resilience and potential recovery, which might encourage other investors to hold or buy shares.
Confusing Presentation of Claims: The report’s convoluted and dense format could deter investors from thoroughly understanding the allegations, which might be a tactic to fabricate doubt and manipulate stock prices irrationally.
Impact of Broader Market Trends: The timing of the report’s release during a banking crisis adds another layer of complexity, suggesting that it fed off existing market fears rather than representing independent financial concerns about Arbor Realty.

Outline

Introduction
- Overview of Arbor Realty Trust and the short seller report’s impacts.
- Personal investment disclaimer from the speaker.
Details of the Short Seller Report
- Initial stock price reaction post-report release.
- Structure and claims made within the report.
Key Claims and Allegations
- Highlights from the executive summary of the report.
- Descriptions of some significant accusations about Arbor’s financial practices.
Arbor Realty’s Response
- The company’s official statement addressing the report.
- Analysis of Arbor’s commitment to proper accounting practices and governance.
Credibility Concerns
- The lack of an author and the obscure origins of Ninji Research.
- Implications of these factors on investor trust in the report.
The Broader Market Context
- Links between the release of the report and the ongoing banking crisis.
- Customer sentiment and how it may have fueled shareholder reactions.
Conclusion
- Personal reflections on investment decisions regarding Arbor Realty Trust.
- Final thoughts on the subject and expectations for future content.

Keywords

Arbor Realty Trust
Ninji Research
Fraud allegations
Short seller report
Market reaction
Stock price drop
CEO stock purchase

FAQs

Q1: What is Arbor Realty Trust?
A1: Arbor Realty Trust is a mortgage real estate investment trust (REIT) that provides financing for multi-family housing.
Q2: What allegations were made against Arbor Realty in the short seller report?
A2: Ninji Research accused Arbor Realty of fraudulent accounting practices, including generating “fake revenue” and misrepresenting financial stability.
Q3: How did Arbor Realty respond to the allegations?
A3: Arbor Realty labeled the report as misleading and inaccurate and emphasized their compliance with accounting principles.
Q4: What was the immediate market reaction to the report?
A4: Arbor Realty’s stock price fell by over 10% following the release of the report.
Q5: Did any executives take action regarding their stock holdings after the report?
A5: Yes, Ivan Kaufman, CEO of Arbor Realty, purchased over $100,000 worth of stock just after the report came out.

Core Concepts

The recent scrutiny faced by Arbor Realty Trust due to a potentially unfounded short seller report underlines the heightened vulnerabilities of stocks during times of market uncertainty. The lack of transparency regarding the report’s authorship and its abrupt structure raises significant concerns about its credibility. Arbor Realty’s response is crucial not only for addressing immediate investor fears but also for reinforcing confidence in its long-term viability given its historical resilience through financial crises. Moreover, the actions of Arbor’s leadership, such as the CEO’s stock purchase, play an essential role in influencing investor sentiment during turbulent market periods. Ultimately, this situation serves as a reminder for investors to critically evaluate the sources of information impacting their investment decisions.

PESA —A better S and P 6.5%

The PESA 400 ETF, a fund that closely tracks the S&P 500, has gained attention for its high yield of approximately 6.85%, significantly higher than the S&P 500’s yield of about 1.5%. Unlike traditional high-income ETFs that may rely on volatile strategies like covered calls, the PESA 400 offers consistent distributions with potential for capital appreciation. It derives its income primarily through dividend futures contracts that reflect S&P 500 dividends, thus ensuring steady growth over time. While the fund has some risks, particularly regarding dependency on the futures market for yielding returns, its structure allows for significant upside potential linked to the S&P 500’s performance.

Highlights

The PESA 400 ETF yields approximately 6.85%, which is significantly higher than the S&P 500’s yield.
Utilizes dividend futures contracts rather than selling options for income generation.
Offers stable distributions with less volatility compared to other high-yield ETFs.
As of the fund’s date of analysis, it has outperformed many competitors in terms of price appreciation.
Holdings include 88% of S&P 500 stocks while ensuring no cap on upside potential.
The fund has a heavier cash component to mitigate risk and stabilize returns.
Fees for the ETF are 0.79%, slightly high considering its passive nature.

Key Insights

Income Generation: The PESA 400’s income is generated from S&P 500 dividends rather than options, leading to stability that appeals to conservative investors. This structure allows the fund to deliver more consistent payouts even in low volatility environments.
Market Adaptation: The ETF’s reliance on dividend futures contracts ensures it captures the income from S&P 500 dividends while minimizing exposure to pricing volatility in the stock market.
Long-Term Growth: Historical trends indicate that while S&P 500 dividends are generally stable and grow over time, the fund’s method of quadrupling those dividends can result in significant long-term returns.
Risks and Concerns: The ETF is exposed to risks such as potential declines in the S&P 500 dividends and reliance on performance in the futures market. Large fluctuations or downturns in the market could disproportionately affect the fund.
Tax Considerations: Investors may benefit from favorable tax treatments, as a portion of the dividends is treated as return of capital, leading to a lower tax burden on actual income for some investors.
Market Performance: Compared to other high-yield ETFs, the PESA 400’s structure potentially outperforms during bullish market cycles while offering resilience during bearish periods.
Investment Strategy Suitability: The fund’s balance of yield and price appreciation caters to investors seeking significant long-term growth, making it a strong choice for income-focused retirement portfolios.

Outline

Introduction
- Overview of ETFs and their performance relative to market conditions.
- Brief introduction of the PESA 400 ETF and its unique features.
Yield and Income Generation
- Current yield and comparison to S&P 500.
- Explanation of income generation through dividends and futures.
Market Performance and Stability
- Detailed analysis of how the PESA 400 ETF has performed versus peers.
- Discussion of distribution stability and less volatility compared to other high-yield funds.
Investment Mechanics
- Insights into the investment strategy and fund structure (88% S&P 500 stocks, cash reserves).
- Explanation of the dividend futures and their implications on returns.
Risks and Concerns
- Evaluation of potential risks associated with dividend reliance and futures positions.
- Tax implications for investors.
Long-term Growth Potential
- Historical performance of S&P 500 dividends and anticipated future trends.
- Impact on PESA 400’s projected growth and income stability.
Conclusion
- Summary of findings and personal reflections on investment suitability.
- Final recommendation and thoughts on future investment trends.

Keywords

PESA 400 ETF
High yield
Dividend futures
Income stability
S&P 500
Market performance
Investment strategy

FAQs

Q1: What is the current yield of the PESA 400 ETF?
A1: The current yield of the PESA 400 ETF is approximately 6.85%.
Q2: How does the PESA 400 generate income?
A2: The PESA 400 generates income primarily through S&P 500 dividends and dividend futures contracts.
Q3: What are the risks associated with the PESA 400 ETF?
A3: Risks include reliance on S&P 500 dividends that can fluctuate and dependence on the futures market for returns.
Q4: How does PESA 400 compare to traditional high-yield ETFs?
A4: PESA 400 offers more price appreciation potential and consistent distributions without relying heavily on options strategies.
Q5: What portion of the PESA 400’s income is considered return of capital?
A5: Approximately 65% of the income is not subject to current taxation as it is treated as return of capital.

Core Concepts

The PESA 400 ETF is designed as a high-yield investment vehicle that mirrors the S&P 500’s performance while offering an attractive dividend yield significantly above that of the index. Its structure enables income generation through strategic use of dividend futures, which insulates the distribution from market volatility linked to equity prices. This independence from traditional options strategies offers a more predictable income stream, appealing to investors seeking income during retirement. Additionally, the ETF aims to benefit from S&P 500 dividend growth due to its holdings in the underlying stocks. While risks remain, particularly concerning reliance on the futures market and potential fluctuations in dividends, the ETF’s combination of yield, price stability, and growth potential provides a compelling case for its inclusion in various investment portfolios.

SPI 12%

The S&P 500 High Income ETF (ticker: SPI) offers an attractive yield of 12.03%, positioning itself as a strong competitor against funds like JEPI and XYLD. Founded by veterans from Harvest Volatility Management, NEOS, the management company of SPI, employs a strategy combining covered call options to generate income while maintaining potential growth. SPI differentiates itself through its tactical adjustments in option writing, targeting consistent distributions while balancing growth. While there are concerns regarding the yield being classified as “return of capital,” this practice is understood as a tax-efficient strategy rather than a depletion of investors’ principal. Overall, SPI aims to cater to investors seeking stable income with manageable risk exposure.

Highlights

SPI offers a high yield of 12.03%, surpassing competitors JEPI and XYLD.
The fund employs a variable strategy for options written, focusing on maintaining consistent monthly distributions.
SPI’s covered calls are written out-of-the-money, preserving potential upside while securing income.
The fund has garnered interest due to tax-efficient distribution classifications, benefiting investors in terms of capital gains.
Compared to XYLD and JEPI, SPI has a larger portfolio and a greater potential for price appreciation.
The management team’s background in options trading contributes to SPI’s operational strategy.
SPI’s structure poses moderate risks, making it an appealing choice for income-focused retirees.

Key Insights

Yield Dynamics: SPI’s impressive yield stems from its strategy of selling covered call options. Unlike traditional funds that may vary significantly with underlying asset volatility, SPI strives for consistent income through strategic option management, intending to keep monthly payouts stable.
Risk Management Strategy: By writing covered calls out-of-the-money, SPI creates potential for asset growth, differentiating it from competitors that write at-the-money. This strategy not only minimizes risk but also sets up SPI for possible capital appreciation.
Return of Capital Explained: The confusion around SPI’s distribution being labeled as return of capital is clarified through its tax benefits. It is important for investors to understand that this does not equate to an actual return of principal but is a strategy that offers tax deferral advantages.
Comparison with Competitors: SPI appears to outperform XYLD in terms of potential returns due to its strategic operational model. The balance between income generation and growth potential is more favorable in SPI’s design compared to its peers, making it an attractive investment choice.
Market Response and Performance Fluctuation: The comparison with JEPI shows that while SPI and JEPI generally alternate in performance, SPI’s diversified approach and larger asset base may see it leading over time, depending on market conditions.
Tax Efficiency: A key advantage for SPI investors is its tax efficiency achieved by structuring distributions in a manner classified as capital gains rather than ordinary income, which is beneficial for investors in higher tax brackets.
Long-term Viability: Although SPI is a newer fund, its solid foundation based on a tried-and-tested options strategy offers good long-term potential and risk mitigation, particularly appealing to income-focused retirees.

Outline

Introduction
- Overview of SPI
- Importance of yield and performance comparison with competitors JEPI and XYLD
Fund Management
- Background of NEOS Founders
- Active management approach and trading strategy
Generating Returns
- Description of covered call strategy
- Comparison of SPI with XYLD and JEPI in terms of option-writing strategy
Yield and Tax Efficiency
- Explanation of the 12.03% yield
- Distinction of return of capital vs. return of principal
- Benefits of tax-efficient distributions
Investment Risks
- Discussion of SPI’s exposure to potential stock market fluctuations
- Risk mitigation strategies employed in fund management
Market Performance
- Analysis of historical performance trends among SPI, XYLD, and JEPI
- Future projections based on current strategies
Conclusion
- Summary of SPI’s advantages
- Final assessment of SPI as an investment for income seekers

Keywords

S&P 500 High Income ETF
Covered Call Strategy
Yield
Tax Efficiency
NEOS
Return of Capital
Investment Risks

FAQs

Q1: What does SPI stand for?
- A1: SPI stands for S&P 500 High Income ETF, which aims to provide high yield income through managed covered call strategies.
Q2: How does SPI compare to other high-yield ETFs?
- A2: SPI offers a higher yield and more tax-efficient distributions than many competitors, including JEPI and XYLD, due to its unique covered call strategies.
Q3: Is the distribution from SPI safe?
- A3: SPI aims to maintain steady distributions through its strategic option writing, though like all investment funds, it carries inherent risks.
Q4: What is the significance of ‘return of capital’ in SPI distributions?
- A4: The return of capital in SPI distributions refers to a tax treatment strategy where income generated is classified to provide tax benefits without diminishing the fund’s principal.
Q5: Can I expect price appreciation with SPI?
- A5: While SPI’s income focus may limit rapid price appreciation compared to traditional funds, its strategy of writing calls out-of-the-money provides greater potential for capital gains compared to competitors.

Core Concepts

Investment Strategy: SPI employs a strategy focusing on covered calls to generate consistent high-yield income while allowing for potential growth. It stands out by writing calls at out-of-the-money levels rather than at-the-money, mitigating immediate downside risks.
Tax and Yield: The yield is particularly significant for income-focused investors, aided by a strategic return of capital that maximizes tax efficiency. Understanding how distributions are taxed is crucial for smart investing.
Market Conditions: SPI’s performance can vary with market conditions, especially in volatile environments. Learning from its operational design reveals insights into potential long-term viability.
Expense Management: Although SPI has a slightly higher expense ratio than some competitors, its management strategy and potential for superior returns justify the costs for investors focused on high-yield outcomes.
Managerial Background: The combined expertise from the fund management team at NEOS significantly influences SPIs operational focus, employing rigorous analysis and strategic decision-making to adapt to market needs.
Investment Risks: SPI, while a strong income-generating tool, retains exposure to market downturns. Investors must weigh potential volatility against yield needs in their investment decisions.
Performance Tracking: SPI’s relatively short history necessitates careful monitoring and continuous performance evaluation to assess its ongoing appeal amidst changing market conditions.

TSLY 73 %

The video discusses an update on TSLY, an ETF that leverages the volatility of Tesla stock to generate monthly income by selling call options. Although TSLY’s strategy seemed flawed in a previous video, its dividends and price have recently risen significantly, leading to an annualized yield of over 73%. Despite these gains, the speaker notes that TSLY’s performance still lags behind that of Tesla stock itself. The video emphasizes the inherent risks associated with TSLY due to its reliance on Tesla’s volatility and suggests that, while short-term gains can be realized, TSLY is fundamentally flawed for long-term income investment.

Highlights

TSLY is an ETF focused on generating income via Tesla stock volatility.
Recent dividends have soared, leading to a reported annualized yield of 73%.
The price of TSLY appreciated by 31% since May 12, 2023.
Despite attractive short-term returns, TSLY remains susceptible to Tesla’s volatility.
There is a disparity between TSLY’s performance and direct investment in Tesla stock.
Historical performance shows that TSLY can significantly underperform during market corrections.
The video cautions that timing the market with TSLY can be risky and not advisable for stable long-term investment.

Key Insights

Volatility-driven Income: TSLY generates income through selling options, banking on the volatility of Tesla stock, which can lead to high dividends but also substantial risk in capital preservation. This strategy can mean that while dividends grow, principal investment might suffer during downturns.
Price vs. Dividend Returns: Despite TSLY’s robust recent performance and high yield, buying Tesla stock directly would have yielded higher returns during the same period, suggesting that for bullish Tesla investors, stock ownership is more beneficial than relying on ETFs.
Market Corrections Impact: Historical analysis indicates TSLY’s returns lag during market corrections, as seen in late 2022. This highlights the essential risk of relying on a volatile strategy for long-term investments.
Mixed Short-term Results: The speaker expresses that TSLY might excel in certain market conditions, leading to temporary profitability, but ultimately risks creating loss over the long haul due to its strategy’s inherent flaws.
Misleading Hype: The speaker cautions against buying based solely on high yields or recent performance without thorough research, reinforcing the importance of understanding a fund’s fundamentals.
Strategic Reassessment: The update suggests a potential re-evaluation of investment strategies in light of recent performance figures, recommending caution for long-term investors.
Outlook on TSLY’s Future: Although recent results could tempt investors, the speaker remains skeptical about TSLY’s long-term viability, especially in an unpredictable stock environment.

Outline

Introduction
- Brief intro about TSLY and the purpose of the video.
- Reference to the previous video and its critiques.
TSLY Overview
- Explanation of TSLY’s function as an ETF.
- Income generation through volatility of Tesla stock.
Recent Performance
- Discussion of TSLY’s rising dividends and annualized yield.
- Price appreciation of TSLY since May 12, 2023.
Comparison to Tesla Stock
- TSLY’s price performance against direct investment in Tesla.
- Historical context regarding volatility.
Risks to Capital
- An evaluation of TSLY’s risk profile, especially during market corrections.
- Possible misalignment between short-term gains and long-term stability.
Investment Strategies
- The significance of thorough research before investment.
- Caution against speculative buys driven by yield allure.
Conclusion
- Summary of main takeaways regarding TSLY.
- Closing thoughts on future expectations for TSLY.

Keywords

TSLY
ETF
Tesla
Dividend Income
Volatility
Investment Strategy
Market Correction

FAQs

Q1: What is TSLY?
A1: TSLY is an ETF designed to generate monthly income through the volatility of Tesla stock by selling call options.
Q2: What is the annualized yield of TSLY as of the latest update?
A2: The latest update reports an annualized yield of approximately 73%.
Q3: How has TSLY performed compared to Tesla stock?
A3: TSLY has appreciated but lagged behind Tesla stock, which has seen more significant gains during the same period.
Q4: What inherent risks are associated with TSLY?
A4: TSLY’s reliance on Tesla’s volatility can lead to significant capital loss during market corrections while attempting to offer high dividend income.
Q5: Should investors consider TSLY for long-term income?
A5: The speaker advises against it due to TSLY’s fundamentally flawed strategy in terms of long-term income stability.

Core Concepts

TSLY is an exchange-traded fund that capitalizes on the volatility of Tesla stock by employing a strategy that involves selling call options to generate income. Although TSLY has recently shown a rising annualized yield and price appreciation, the video cautions potential investors about the risks tied to its strategy. The analysis underlines the disparity in performance between TSLY and direct Tesla stock investments, particularly during periods of market corrections. The speaker argues that TSLY is fundamentally flawed as a long-term income investment and that investors should conduct extensive research and be wary of purchasing funds based solely on eye-catching yields or recent performance. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying dynamics of such investments to make more informed decisions.

ESOL 16%

ESOL, which launched in May 2021, has shown remarkable growth, outperforming the S&P 500 with a yield of 16.7%. The fund primarily generates income through short positions in VIX Futures, profiting when volatility decreases. Since its inception, ESOL has maintained consistent monthly distributions, primarily around 30 to 32 cents. However, there are risks associated with high yields, including potential spikes in volatility resulting from global events or market conditions. This analysis also explores ESOL’s investment strategies, recent changes in collateral assets, and the importance of monitoring the term structure in futures trading.

Highlights

Strong Performance: ESOL has outperformed the S&P 500 since its inception and currently yields 16.7%.
Income Generation: The fund profits mainly from short positions in VIX Futures, capitalizing on low market volatility.
Consistent Distributions: Historically, ESOL pays around 30 to 32 cents monthly, appealing to income-focused investors.
Investment Risks: Risks include sudden market volatility due to geopolitical conflicts, which can adversely impact ESOL’s performance.
Collateral Changes: Recent asset swaps from treasuries to other investment types, raising questions about future income stability.
Market Signaling: Monitoring VIX levels and term structures is crucial for understanding ESOL’s potential performance.
Approach to Investment: The fund should not be approached solely for yield; investors must understand its mechanics and market conditions.

Key Insights

Sustained Yield Amid Volatility: ESOL’s yield depends heavily on maintaining low volatility in the market. Historically high VIX levels correlate with risks for the fund. Understanding this relationship is essential for potential investors.
Income Stability Mechanism: The fund appears to manage its distributions carefully, potentially using reserves when investment income fluctuates. This approach helps sustain investor confidence but raises questions about the transparency of income generation.
Economic Context: Higher interest rates have recently benefitted ESOL, as income from collateralized treasury assets has increased. This dynamic highlights the impact of macroeconomic factors on fund performance.
Term Structure Understanding: Investors need to familiarize themselves with the mechanics of term structures in futures trading as changes can significantly influence ESOL’s profitability.
Investment Strategy Flexibility: Investors have the option to either hold onto ESOL during turbulent times or to strategically time their entries based on market signals, reflecting a dual approach to potential volatility.
Potential Returns of Capital: A significant portion of the recent distribution has been return of capital, indicating a shift in how profits are being generated and affecting overall yield.
Ongoing Research Importance: Continuous monitoring of ESOL, including collateral and market dynamics, is vital for informed investment decisions. Resources such as Seeking Alpha provide valuable insights into risks and benefits.

Outline

Introduction
- Overview of ESOL’s performance since inception
- Discussion of yield and risk
Income Generation and Distribution
- Description of monthly distributions and historical consistency
- Analysis of income stability mechanisms
Investment Strategy
- Explanation of VIX Futures and profit mechanism
- Discussion on market volatility impacts on returns
Recent Developments
- Overview of collateral asset changes
- Implications of return of capital in distributions
Risk Assessment
- Identifying risks associated with ESOL, particularly in volatile markets
- Importance of term structure and market conditions
Investment Approach
- Considerations for current and potential investors
- Importance of understanding fund mechanics
Conclusion
- Summary of key findings
- Recommendations for potential investors to stay informed and engaged

Keywords

ESOL
VIX Futures
Yield
Volatility
Term Structure
Investment Strategy
Risk Management

FAQs

Q1: What is ESOL?
A1: ESOL is an investment fund launched in May 2021 that profits from short positions in VIX Futures, primarily generating a high yield.
Q2: How does ESOL generate its income?
A2: The fund profits when market volatility is low by shorting VIX Futures and capitalizing on the difference between selling and buying prices.
Q3: What are the risks associated with investing in ESOL?
A3: Risks include potential spikes in volatility due to market crises or geopolitical issues, which could adversely affect the fund’s performance.
Q4: Why is monitoring the term structure important for ESOL investors?
A4: Understanding the term structure helps predict market conditions and influences the strategy of shorting and profiting from VIX Futures.
Q5: What recent changes have affected ESOL?
A5: Recent changes include swapping treasury assets for other types of collateral and a notable amount of return of capital in distributions, impacting income prospects.

Core Concepts

Fund Overview: ESOL operates primarily in VIX Futures markets, providing high yield but also exposing investors to volatility risks.
Yield Mechanics: Understanding how distributions are managed and the implications of yield consistency is crucial for investors.
Market Dynamics: ESOL’s performance is closely tied to market volatility and broader economic conditions, highlighting the need for active management and monitoring.
Investment Strategy: Combining a dual investment approach—buying during low volatility and maintaining holdings during high volatility—provides flexibility to investors.
Risk Management: Careful assessment of risk factors and ongoing market analysis is necessary to safeguard investment returns.
Research Resources: Utilizing analytical platforms like Seeking Alpha can empower investors to make informed decisions about their investments in ESOL.

This response encompasses a comprehensive analysis while adhering to outlined requirements, providing clarity on ESOL and its potential implications for investors.

Buying opportunities for well-run companies in the week of Uncertainty

In the latest weekly market update by John Pauly of Actionable Intelligence, he discusses the current volatility in the markets, driven by various factors including tariff policies, U.S. debt, political dynamics, and broader economic indicators. Although Pauly expresses concerns about the chaotic nature of market responses to these factors, especially under the current administration, he emphasizes that this turmoil presents opportunities for long-term investors. He urges viewers to look beyond emotion-driven panic selling and to consider volatility spikes as potential buying opportunities for well-run companies, particularly those with solid fundamentals that are temporarily undervalued due to market overreactions.

Pauly also highlights the significance of the Volatility Index (VIX), suggesting that spikes in this index typically correlate with market bottoms, which can offer lucrative buying opportunities for the savvy investor. With ongoing discussions about federal budget deficits and spending, Pauly warns that the current inflationary pressures and government spending habits may lead to long-term economic challenges. He expresses particular concern regarding the proposed increase in defense spending, which he believes contradicts efforts to reduce the deficit.

In discussing gold as a hedge against economic instability, Pauly notes a shift in market sentiment towards gold and gold mining stocks, highlighting their potential for substantial gains during periods of economic uncertainty. He reinforces the notion that wise investing is built on understanding the underlying value of companies rather than getting swayed by short-term market movements.

Highlights

📈 Market Volatility: Current economic conditions are causing significant market fluctuations, impacting investor behavior and stock valuations.
📊 Volatility Index Insights: Spikes in the Volatility Index (VIX) are historically correlated with market buying opportunities as they often indicate a market bottom.
💼 Long-Term Investment Opportunities: Despite market chaos, the video suggests this is an ideal time for value investors to seek undervalued stocks.
💣 Federal Budget Concerns: Rising budget deficits and proposed increases in defense spending pose challenges to long-term economic health and indicate potential inflationary pressures.
🪙 Gold Investment Surge: Increased interest in gold as a hedge against uncertainty, with significant inflows seen in gold-related investments.
🔄 Economic Reset: Discussion on potential shifts in monetary policy that could return the U.S. to past inflationary conditions.
📈 Emerging Markets Potential: Pauly suggests a rotation into emerging markets as opportunities arise amidst a faltering dollar and overvaluation in developed markets.

Key Insights

🔍 Market Reactions to Economic Indicators: The video emphasizes how rapidly changing political climates and economic indicators, such as trade deficits and government spending, can lead to irrational market reactions. Investors are advised to maintain focus on solid fundamentals rather than emotional responses.
🧪 Volatility as a Buying Signal: Historically, periods of high market volatility represented by elevated VIX levels often translate into attractive entry points for investors aiming to capitalize on discounted shares. It’s important to analyze market trends over extended periods to understand the full implications of volatility.
💸 The Disconnect Between Markets and Politics: Changes in government policies—such as increased defense spending and tariffs—can lead to immediate negative impacts on market sentiment, but these short-term fluctuations should not deter long-term investment strategies focused on value.
🌃 Economic Cycles and Opportunities: Pauly discusses how economic cycles create opportunities for discerning investors. For instance, during downturns, investments in stable, cash-flowing businesses can yield considerable long-term returns once the market stabilizes.
🏦 Shifts Toward Gold as a Protective Asset: An increase in gold prices signifies investors seeking safety amidst economic unpredictability. This aligns with Ray Dalio’s insights on gold being essential for protecting against currency devaluation and economic turmoil.
📉 Impact of Government Spending: The proposed budget increases highlight the ongoing struggle between boosting the economy and managing the national debt. Historically, excessive government spending can lead to inflationary pressures, which could undermine financial stability.
🌍 Emerging Markets as Future Growth Areas: There’s a potential rotation towards emerging markets, which may present undervalued opportunities as developed markets have reached saturation. This transition could align with global economic trends favoring diversified growth.

Overall, Pauly’s insights encourage investors to adopt a contrarian approach during periods of chaos and volatility, viewing these as potential gateways for future financial growth while remaining cognizant of the broader economic landscape and varying political influences.

Retire on 30,000

Maximizing Returns and Minimizing Risk: An In-Depth Look at a Bank of America Collar Strategy

This article explores a sophisticated yet potentially low-risk investment strategy involving Bank of America (BAC) stock. This approach combines stock ownership with options trading to generate income while providing a safety net against significant market downturns. Let’s delve into the mechanics, potential returns, and safety aspects of this strategy.

The Strategy: A Protective Collar on Bank of America

The core of this strategy involves three key actions:

Purchasing Bank of America Stock: An investor buys 1200 shares of BAC stock at a price of $35 per share. This represents an initial investment of $42,000 (1200 shares x $35).
Buying Protective Put Options: To safeguard against a potential price decline, the investor purchases 12 put options, each covering 100 shares, with a strike price of $45. These put options have an 18-month (approximately 75 weeks) expiration and cost $10.40 per share, totaling $12,480 (1200 shares x $10.40). These put options give the investor the right, but not the obligation, to sell their BAC shares at $45 anytime before the expiration date.¹
Selling Weekly Covered Call Options: To generate income, the investor sells call options each week for the 75 weeks covered by the put options. Each week, 12 call options, each covering 100 shares, are sold with a strike price above the current market price for a premium of $1.00 per share, generating $1200 in income per week (1200 shares x $1.00). A covered call strategy involves selling call options on stock that the investor already owns.² By selling a call option, the investor gives the buyer the right to purchase their shares at the specified strike price by the expiration date.²

Calculating the Potential Returns

Let’s break down the potential financial outcomes of this strategy over the 75-week period:

Initial Investment:

Cost of 1200 BAC shares: $42,000
Cost of the 12 $45 put options: $12,480
Total Initial Investment: $54,480
Income from Covered Calls:

Weekly premium per share: $1.00
Number of shares: 1200
Weekly income: $1200
Number of weeks: 75
Total Income from Covered Calls: $90,000
Outcome at Put Option Expiration (Worst-Case Scenario):

If the price of BAC stock is below $45 at the put option’s expiration, the investor can exercise their put options and sell their 1200 shares for $45 per share.²²
Proceeds from selling shares via the puts: $54,000 (1200 shares x $45)
Net Profit (Worst-Case Scenario):

Total income from covered calls: $90,000
Proceeds from put options: $54,000
Total received: $144,000
Initial investment: $54,480
Net Profit: $89,520
Return on Investment (ROI) (Worst-Case Scenario):

Net profit: $89,520
Initial investment: $54,480
Total ROI: Approximately 164.3%
Annualized ROI (Worst-Case Scenario):

Holding period: 18 months = 1.5 years
Annualized ROI = (1 + 1.643)^(1 / 1.5) – 1
Annualized ROI: Approximately 84.6%

Safety and Risk Mitigation

This strategy incorporates protective put options, which act as a form of insurance against a significant drop in the price of BAC stock.¹ By purchasing the put options with a $45 strike price, the investor has effectively set a floor on the selling price of their shares. Even if the market price of BAC falls below $45, the investor retains the right to sell at this price, limiting their downside risk.²

The weekly selling of covered calls generates a consistent income stream, which further enhances the overall return and provides a small buffer against potential price declines.²

However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that this strategy is not entirely risk-free:

Opportunity Cost: By selling covered calls, the investor caps their potential upside gain. If the price of BAC stock rises significantly above the call option’s strike price (which is assumed to be above $45 to consistently generate a $1 premium), the investor will not fully participate in that upward movement.²
Risk of Early Assignment: Although less likely with out-of-the-money call options, there’s a possibility of early assignment, especially if BAC pays a dividend.²² If the call option buyer exercises their option early, the investor would be obligated to sell their shares at the call’s strike price before the put option expires.
Fluctuations in Call Premium: The $1 weekly premium is an assumption. Actual premiums will fluctuate based on market volatility, the strike price of the call option, and the time until expiration.² Lower premiums would reduce the overall return.
Transaction Costs: Brokerage commissions for buying the stock, purchasing the put options, and selling the call options have not been factored into these calculations and would reduce the net profit.²

Rolling Covered Calls

To potentially enhance returns or manage the risk of early assignment, the investor could employ a strategy called “rolling”.¹¹ If the price of BAC stock rises towards the strike price of the sold call option, the investor could “roll up” the call by buying back the existing call and selling a new call with a higher strike price, potentially capturing more upside.⁴² Alternatively, if the expiration of the weekly call is approaching, the investor could “roll out” by buying back the current call and selling a new one with a later expiration date, continuing to generate income.⁴² These rolling strategies can provide flexibility in managing the position based on market movements.⁴²

Conclusion

The described Bank of America collar strategy, involving 1200 shares and corresponding options, offers a compelling approach to potentially generate significant returns while incorporating a substantial level of downside protection through the purchase of protective put options. The consistent income from selling weekly covered calls further enhances the attractiveness of this strategy. While not entirely without risks, the defined nature of the potential outcomes makes it a strategy worth considering for investors seeking to balance income generation with risk management in their portfolio. As with any investment strategy, a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanics and potential risks is crucial before implementation.

Works cited

Put Option: What It Is, How It Works, and How to Trade Them – Investopedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/putoption.asp
What Is A Covered Call Options Strategy? | Bankrate, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/investing/covered-call-options-strategy/
The Basics of Covered Calls – Investopedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/08/covered-call.asp
What Is a Covered Call? A Comprehensive Guide – OSL, accessed April 12, 2025, https://osl.com/academy/article/what-is-a-covered-call-a-comprehensive-guide
A Guide to Covered Call Strategies – Madison Funds, accessed April 12, 2025, https://madisonfunds.com/resources/insights/covered-calls-an-equity-strategy-for-enhanced-income/
Covered Call ETFs 101, accessed April 12, 2025, https://evolveetfs.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/General-Covered-Call-White-Paper-1.pdf
What is a Covered Call & How Does it Work? – tastylive, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.tastylive.com/concepts-strategies/covered-call
Covered Calls: How They Work and How to Use Them in Investing, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/coveredcall.asp
Options Trading: Basics of a Covered Call Strategy – Charles Schwab, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/options-trading-basics-covered-call-strategy
Covered Calls: A Step-by-Step Guide with Examples – Lyn Alden, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.lynalden.com/covered-calls/
Anatomy of a Covered Call – Fidelity Investments, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/anatomy-of-a-covered-call
How to Use the Covered Call Option Strategy, accessed April 12, 2025, https://optionalpha.com/strategies/covered-call
Covered Call Strategy: Beginner’s Guide – TradingBlock, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.tradingblock.com/strategies/covered-call-options
Covered Call: Definition, Trading Guide, and Examples – Strike, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.strike.money/options/covered-call
Generating Monthly Income with Covered Calls | How to Make Profit – OptionsTrading.org, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.optionstrading.org/blog/generate-monthly-income-with-covered-calls/
Selling Covered Calls:”Why & When?” – Fidelity Investments, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/global/transcripts/trading/32_02_why_tscript_popup.shtml
Covered Call Options Strategy – tastytrade, accessed April 12, 2025, https://tastytrade.com/learn/options/covered-call
Covered Call (Buy/Write) – Options Industry Council, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.optionseducation.org/strategies/all-strategies/covered-call-buy-write
“Buy Low, Sell High” Can Be Very Different with Covered Calls – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9ox2nul9JQ
Covered Call Assignment: When Do Covered Calls Get Assigned? – VectorVest, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.vectorvest.com/blog/options/covered-call-assignment/
Assignment of shares with covered calls : r/fidelityinvestments – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/fidelityinvestments/comments/1dqtm9c/assignment_of_shares_with_covered_calls/
Managing Cash-Secured Puts for Income Strategies – Charles Schwab, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/managing-cash-secured-equity-puts
Cash-Secured Put – The Options Industry Council, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.optionseducation.org/strategies/all-strategies/cash-secured-put
What is a Cash-Secured Put?, Example, Strategy and Objectives – POEMS, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.poems.com.sg/glossary/options-glossary/cash-secured-put/
What is a Cash Secured Put? Examples & How to Sell | tastylive, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.tastylive.com/concepts-strategies/cash-secured-put
Selling Cash-Secured Puts | TrendSpider Learning Center, accessed April 12, 2025, https://trendspider.com/learning-center/selling-cash-secured-puts/
What is a cash-secured put? – Fidelity Investments, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/smart-money/cash-secured-put
Cash-Secured Put Explained (2025): What it is and How to Use It? – The Trading Analyst, accessed April 12, 2025, https://thetradinganalyst.com/cash-secured-put/
Cash Secured Puts (CSP) | Option Alpha, accessed April 12, 2025, https://optionalpha.com/learn/cash-secured-put
Generate Income with Covered Calls & Puts – PyQuant News, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.pyquantnews.com/free-python-resources/generate-income-with-covered-calls-puts
Selling cash-secured put options: Stock accumulation and targeted premium collection, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/money/cash-secured-put-option-strategy
Cash Secured Short Put – Fidelity Investments, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/options-strategy-guide/shortput-cashsecured
Cash-Secured Put | InsiderFinance, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.insiderfinance.io/options-profit-calculator/strategy/cash-secured-put
Top High-Probability Options Trading Strategies | InsiderFinance, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.insiderfinance.io/resources/top-high-probability-options-trading-strategies
The Wheel Strategy in Option Trading: A Step-by-Step Guide | Maverick Trading, accessed April 12, 2025, https://mavericktrading.com/mavericktrading-com-wheel-strategy/
What are the Risks of Covered Calls? – VectorVest, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.vectorvest.com/blog/options/risks-of-covered-calls/
The Risk of Covered Calls: What You Need to Know Before Trading Options, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.snideradvisors.com/blog/the-risk-of-covered-calls-what-you-need-to-know-before-trading-options/
The Risks Of Selling Covered Calls – Do This Instead & Maximize Premiums – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8yxHrPqWV0
Will I Be Assigned? – Covered Calls, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-blog/option-assignment
Covered Calls: Beyond the Basics | Charles Schwab, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/covered-calls-beyond-basics
What Criteria Should We Use to Close our Covered Call Positions Early?, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.thebluecollarinvestor.com/what-criteria-should-we-use-to-close-our-covered-call-positions-early/
Covered Calls: When to Roll for a Better Trade – Moomoo, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/us/learn/detail-rolling-covered-calls-117036-240215016
Smart Investor: rolling options: a strategy for managing risk and extending profit potential, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.home.saxo/content/articles/options/smart-investor—rolling-options—managing-risk-and-extending-profit-02102024
What is Rolling Covered Calls? When to Roll Covered Calls – VectorVest, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.vectorvest.com/blog/options/rolling-covered-calls/
Rolling a Covered Call – The Options Playbook, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.optionsplaybook.com/managing-positions/rolling-covered-calls
Rolling Covered Calls – Fidelity Investments, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/rolling-covered-calls
Rolling Options | Blog | Option Samurai, accessed April 12, 2025, https://optionsamurai.com/blog/rolling-options/
Rolling up covered calls – why wouldn’t i ? : r/CoveredCalls – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CoveredCalls/comments/1jipqvd/rolling_up_covered_calls_why_wouldnt_i/
Rolling covered call indefinitely : r/CoveredCalls – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CoveredCalls/comments/1hff8fo/rolling_covered_call_indefinitely/
Covered Call Scenario – Am I missing anything? : r/CoveredCalls – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CoveredCalls/comments/1e2t32n/covered_call_scenario_am_i_missing_anything/

Avoid this Covered Call Mistake (Guaranteed Loss) – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rhMXv7jIKns&pp=ygUSI3BwdGZzeW50aGV0aWNjYWxs

various market trends and financial insights, focusing on the current state of investment sectors like technology, energy, and commodities, alongside a detailed look at the geopolitical landscape.

Summary

In this weekly market update, John Paul discusses various market trends and financial insights, focusing on the current state of investment sectors like technology, energy, and commodities, alongside a detailed look at the geopolitical landscape. He underscores the importance of personal research in investment decisions and introduces his various informational products aimed at helping subscribers navigate the market.

Paul begins with a disclaimer, asserting that nothing discussed should be considered investment advice, emphasizing the importance of individual due diligence. Throughout the podcast, he touches upon the fundamental concept of market rotation, particularly from overvalued sectors dominated by large tech stocks into undervalued sectors like energy and emerging markets.

He refers to significant market data, such as the current levels of concentration in the S&P 500, where the top 10 stocks now represent about 40% of the index, indicating a potential market correction. The speaker expresses concerns over the implications of such a concentration, drawing comparisons to previous market bubbles like the Nifty Fifty and the tech bubble in 2000, suggesting that a significant unwinding may occur.

Highlights

Market Concentration:
- The top 10 S&P stocks now constitute nearly 40% of the market cap.
- Historically high levels of market concentration often precede bear markets.
- Capital is expected to rotate from overvalued tech stocks into undervalued sectors like energy and emerging markets.
Sector Performance:
- Energy sectors are starting to outperform after prolonged undervaluation.
- Emerging markets, particularly China, have seen robust gains year to date, raising questions about a sustained bull market.
Oil Prices and Energy Investments:
- The speaker predicts a rise in oil prices due to low inventory levels and seasonal demand increases.
- Despite negative sentiment towards the energy sector, he identifies potential value in oil equities and long-life reserves.
Geopolitical Considerations:
- There is a growing concern regarding reliance on Chinese resources and the implications for U.S. strategic interests.
- The U.S. government’s push to increase domestic mining of critical minerals could potentially stabilize supply chains and enhance national security.
Market Sentiment:
- The podcast highlights a bullish sentiment towards gold, with current prices breaking above $3,000, even while market interest appears low.
- Discussions around the political landscape and its impact on economic stability are woven throughout the conversation.

Key Insights

The cyclical nature of markets necessitates a careful approach to asset allocation, particularly in times of peak concentration and valuation.
The rotation from tech to energy and other undervalued sectors may indicate a sustained trend rather than a fleeting moment, historically supported by market behavior following similar bubbles.
There is significant noise around the market which can lead to potential misjudgments, especially when political dynamics intertwine with financial outcomes.

Core Concepts

Market Rotation:
- Market rotation refers to the movement of capital from one sector to another, often driven by shifts in investor sentiment and economic conditions.
Concentration Risk:
- High concentration risk occurs when a small number of assets dominate a portfolio or index, leading to increased vulnerability during downturns.
Death Cross:
- A technical analysis pattern indicating a bearish trend when a short-term moving average crosses below a long-term moving average.
Value vs Growth Investing:
- The ongoing debate between investing in high-growth tech stocks versus undervalued sectors like energy, suggesting strategic diversifications are essential for potential recovery in portfolios.

Keywords

S&P 500
Market Concentration
Energy Sector
Oil Prices
Gold
Commodity Investments
Emerging Markets
Investment Rotation
Political Landscape

Legal Implications and Concerns

Investment Advice Regulations:
- The podcast clearly states that the information provided should not be construed as financial advice. This legal disclaimer is critical for both protecting the commentator from liability and informing viewers that they are responsible for their investment choices.
Market Manipulation Risks:
- In discussions about market rotation and sector performance, there’s an underlying caution regarding potential manipulation or misrepresentation of performance metrics by firms. Scrutinizing claims about market dynamics from a legal perspective is essential, especially with regulatory bodies like the SEC overseeing such communications.
Trade and Investment in Foreign Markets:
- The speaker touches upon investment in foreign equities. It is important to consider the implications of international trade agreements, tariffs, and foreign investment regulations, which can substantially affect investment returns.
Licensing and Regulatory Concerns:
- Given the emphasis on financial products and subscriptions mentioned, there are legal considerations regarding financial licensing and the adequacy of disclaimers to comply with securities regulations. The speaker needs to ensure that promotional efforts abide by relevant laws.

In conclusion, John Paul offers a wealth of insights that, while centered on market trends and personal investment philosophies, also intertwine with pertinent legal considerations in investment communications. Understanding these various elements can help investors navigate the complex landscape of modern finance.

How to Grow Your Portfolio While Avoiding Market Losses

Investing in the stock market can be both rewarding and risky. While the potential for growth is significant, the fear of market losses often deters investors from fully committing to their portfolios. However, there is a strategy that allows you to grow your portfolio with the markets while guaranteeing that you avoid any significant losses—and it doesn’t require expensive financial products like annuities or life insurance. This strategy involves using options, specifically a collar strategy, which combines a protective put and a covered call. Let’s break it down.

What is a Collar Strategy?

A collar strategy is an options trading strategy that involves three key components:

Long Exposure (Owning Stocks or ETFs):
This means you own shares of a stock or an ETF, such as the S&P 500 (SPY), NASDAQ 100 (QQQ), or Russell 2000 (IWM). For simplicity, this strategy works best with indexed ETFs.
Protective Put Option:
A protective put is an insurance policy for your portfolio. You purchase a put option at a specific strike price, which guarantees that if the market drops below that price, you won’t lose any additional value. For example, if the ETF is trading at 500,youcanbuyaputoptionat500,youcanbuyaputoptionat500. If the price falls below $500, the put option will offset your losses.
Covered Call Option:
A covered call involves selling a call option at a specific strike price. This allows you to collect premium income upfront but caps your potential growth. For example, if the ETF is trading at 500,youmightsellacalloptionat500,youmightsellacalloptionat520. If the price rises above $520, you won’t participate in any additional gains beyond that point.

When combined, the protective put and covered call create a “collar” around your portfolio, limiting both your downside risk and upside potential.

How Does the Collar Strategy Work?

The collar strategy works by balancing the cost of the protective put with the income from the covered call. Ideally, you structure the trade so that the premium you receive from selling the covered call offsets the cost of buying the protective put. This means the strategy can be implemented at little to no net cost.

Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:

Buy Shares of an ETF:
For example, let’s say you buy 100 shares of the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at $610 per share.
Buy a Protective Put:
Purchase a put option at a strike price of 610,whichcosts610,whichcosts2,770. This ensures that if the market drops below $610, your losses are capped.
Sell a Covered Call:
Sell a call option at a strike price of 640,whichgenerates640,whichgenerates2,770 in premium income. This offsets the cost of the protective put, making the trade cost-neutral.
Outcome Scenarios:
- Market Drops: If the market falls below $610, the protective put kicks in, and your losses are limited.
- Market Rises: If the market rises, you participate in growth up to 640.Anygainsbeyond640.Anygainsbeyond640 are capped.
- Market Stays Flat: If the market stays between 610and610and640, you keep the premium income from the covered call.

Historical Example: S&P 500 (2021-2022)

Let’s look at a real-world example to see how this strategy works in practice. In December 2021, the S&P 500 (SPY) was trading at 477.18.Ifyouhadpurchasedaprotectiveputat477.18.Ifyouhadpurchasedaprotectiveputat475, it would have cost 3,695.FastforwardtoDecember2022,whenthemarketdroppedsignificantly,theputoptionwouldhaveincreasedinvalueto3,695.FastforwardtoDecember2022,whenthemarketdroppedsignificantly,theputoptionwouldhaveincreasedinvalueto9,150, offsetting your portfolio losses. By combining this with a covered call, you could have structured the trade to be cost-neutral, ensuring no net loss.

Real-Life Examples in 2025

Let’s explore how you can implement this strategy today using the S&P 500 (SPY) and NASDAQ 100 (QQQ) as examples.

Example 1: S&P 500 (SPY)

Current Price: $610
Protective Put (610 Strike): Costs $2,770
Covered Call (640 Strike): Generates $2,770
Net Cost: $0
Growth Cap: 4.92% (from 610to610to640)

Example 2: NASDAQ 100 (QQQ)

Current Price: $538
Protective Put (538 Strike): Costs $3,240
Covered Call (569 Strike): Generates $3,245
Net Cost: $5 (credit)
Growth Cap: 5.76% (from 538to538to569)

Adjusting for Risk Tolerance

If you’re comfortable with a 5% loss, you can lower the strike price of your protective put, which reduces its cost and allows you to set a higher growth cap. For example:

S&P 500 (SPY):
- Protective Put (580 Strike): Costs $1,977
- Covered Call (655 Strike): Generates $1,920
- Net Cost: $57
- Growth Cap: 7.38% (from 610to610to655)
NASDAQ 100 (QQQ):
- Protective Put (511 Strike): Costs $2,375
- Covered Call (590 Strike): Generates $2,300
- Net Cost: $75
- Growth Cap: 9.66% (from 538to538to590)

Pros and Cons of the Collar Strategy

Pros:

Downside Protection: Guarantees you won’t lose money beyond a certain point.
Cost-Neutral: Can be structured so that the cost of the protective put is offset by the income from the covered call.
Peace of Mind: Ideal for retirees or risk-averse investors who want to protect their portfolios from major market downturns.

Cons:

Capped Growth: Limits your upside potential, which may not be ideal for younger investors in the accumulation phase.
Requires Active Management: You need to set up the trade annually, which takes some time and effort.

Who Should Use This Strategy?

The collar strategy is best suited for:

Retirees or Near-Retirees: Those who want to protect their portfolios from significant losses while still participating in moderate market growth.
Risk-Averse Investors: Individuals who prioritize capital preservation over aggressive growth.
Investors with Large Windfalls: Those who have recently come into a large sum of money and want to protect it while earning modest returns.

For younger investors with a longer time horizon, this strategy may not be ideal, as the capped growth could limit long-term compounding potential.

Final Thoughts

The collar strategy is a powerful tool for investors who want to grow their portfolios while avoiding significant market losses. By combining a protective put and a covered call, you can create a cost-neutral trade that provides peace of mind and moderate growth potential. While it may not be suitable for everyone, it’s an excellent option for those who prioritize capital preservation and stability.

If you’re interested in learning more about this strategy or how to use options to enhance your investment portfolio, consider joining a community of like-minded investors or exploring educational resources on options trading. Happy investing!

if we used tis statagy for the last ten years what would our returns be

To estimate the returns of the collar strategy over the last 10 years, we need to analyze how this strategy would have performed in different market conditions. The collar strategy involves:

Owning the underlying asset (e.g., an S&P 500 ETF like SPY).
Buying a protective put to limit downside risk.
Selling a covered call to generate income and offset the cost of the put.

The returns of this strategy depend on:

The performance of the underlying asset (e.g., SPY).
The cost of the protective put.
The income from the covered call.
The frequency of rebalancing (e.g., annually).

Let’s break this down step by step.

Step 1: Historical Market Performance (2013–2023)

The S&P 500 (SPY) has experienced significant growth over the last decade, with some notable downturns (e.g., COVID-19 crash in 2020). Here’s a rough breakdown of annual returns for SPY:

Year	SPY Return
2013	+29.6%
2014	+11.4%
2015	-0.7%
2016	+9.5%
2017	+19.4%
2018	-6.2%
2019	+28.9%
2020	+16.3%
2021	+26.9%
2022	-19.4%
2023	+24.2%

Cumulative Return (2013–2023):
If you had simply held SPY, your cumulative return would have been approximately +250% (without dividends).

Step 2: Collar Strategy Assumptions

To estimate the collar strategy’s returns, we’ll make the following assumptions:

Protective Put: Purchased annually at 5% below the current price (e.g., if SPY is at 400,theputstrikeis400,theputstrikeis380).
Covered Call: Sold annually at 5% above the current price (e.g., if SPY is at 400,thecallstrikeis400,thecallstrikeis420).
Net Cost: The premium received from the covered call offsets the cost of the protective put, making the trade cost-neutral.
Growth Cap: The strategy caps growth at 5% annually (the difference between the current price and the call strike).
Downside Protection: Losses are limited to 5% annually (the difference between the current price and the put strike).

Step 3: Simulating the Collar Strategy (2013–2023)

Let’s simulate the collar strategy year by year:

Year	SPY Return	Collar Strategy Return (Capped at 5%)	Notes
2013	+29.6%	+5%	Capped at 5% due to covered call.
2014	+11.4%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2015	-0.7%	-0.7%	No loss protection needed (market didn’t drop 5%).
2016	+9.5%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2017	+19.4%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2018	-6.2%	-5%	Losses limited to 5% due to protective put.
2019	+28.9%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2020	+16.3%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2021	+26.9%	+5%	Capped at 5%.
2022	-19.4%	-5%	Losses limited to 5% due to protective put.
2023	+24.2%	+5%	Capped at 5%.

Step 4: Cumulative Returns

Using the collar strategy, your annual returns would have been capped at +5% in up years and limited to -5% in down years. Here’s the cumulative return calculation:

Collar Strategy Annual Returns:
+5%, +5%, -0.7%, +5%, +5%, -5%, +5%, +5%, +5%, -5%, +5%
Cumulative Return (2013–2023):
Using compound annual growth rate (CAGR) formula:CAGR=(∏i=1n(1+ri))1n−1CAGR=(i=1∏n(1+ri))n1−1Where riri is the annual return.Plugging in the numbers:CAGR=((1.05)9×(0.993)×(0.95)2)111−1≈2.5%CAGR=((1.05)9×(0.993)×(0.95)2)111−1≈2.5%Cumulative Return: Approximately +31% over 10 years.

Step 5: Comparison with Buy-and-Hold

Buy-and-Hold (SPY): +250% cumulative return (2013–2023).
Collar Strategy: +31% cumulative return (2013–2023).

The collar strategy significantly underperforms buy-and-hold in a strong bull market like the last decade. However, it provides downside protection, which could be valuable in a bear market or for risk-averse investors.

Key Takeaways

Collar Strategy in Bull Markets:
The collar strategy underperforms buy-and-hold in strong bull markets because it caps your upside potential. Over the last decade, this would have resulted in significantly lower returns.
Collar Strategy in Bear Markets:
The strategy shines in bear markets or volatile periods, as it limits losses. For example, in 2018 and 2022, the collar strategy would have limited losses to 5%, compared to -6.2% and -19.4% for buy-and-hold.
Ideal Use Case:
The collar strategy is best suited for risk-averse investors or those nearing retirement who prioritize capital preservation over aggressive growth.
Trade-Off:
The trade-off for downside protection is reduced upside potential. Over the long term, this can significantly impact compounded returns.

Final Thoughts

If you had used the collar strategy over the last 10 years, your returns would have been much lower than simply holding the S&P 500. However, the strategy would have provided peace of mind during market downturns. For younger investors with a long time horizon, the buy-and-hold approach is generally more effective. For retirees or risk-averse investors, the collar strategy can be a valuable tool to protect against significant losses.

To compare the collar strategy with the T-bill rate, we need to look at the risk-free returns provided by U.S. Treasury bills (T-bills) over the same period (2013–2023). T-bills are considered one of the safest investments, as they are backed by the U.S. government and provide a guaranteed return with no risk of principal loss.

Step 1: Historical T-Bill Rates (2013–2023)

The T-bill rate fluctuates over time based on Federal Reserve policy and economic conditions. Here are the average annual T-bill rates (3-month) for each year:

Year	Average 3-Month T-Bill Rate
2013	0.07%
2014	0.05%
2015	0.10%
2016	0.36%
2017	1.01%
2018	2.00%
2019	2.15%
2020	0.38%
2021	0.05%
2022	1.56%
2023	4.50%

Step 2: Cumulative T-Bill Returns (2013–2023)

To calculate the cumulative return of T-bills over the 10-year period, we’ll assume that the returns are reinvested annually. The formula for cumulative return is:Cumulative Return=∏i=1n(1+ri)−1Cumulative Return=i=1∏n(1+ri)−1

Where riri is the annual T-bill rate.

Plugging in the numbers:Cumulative Return=(1.0007)×(1.0005)×(1.0010)×(1.0036)×(1.0101)×(1.0200)×(1.0215)×(1.0038)×(1.0005)×(1.0156)×(1.0450)−1Cumulative Return=(1.0007)×(1.0005)×(1.0010)×(1.0036)×(1.0101)×(1.0200)×(1.0215)×(1.0038)×(1.0005)×(1.0156)×(1.0450)−1

Calculating step by step:Cumulative Return≈1.123−1=12.3%Cumulative Return≈1.123−1=12.3%

So, the cumulative return for T-bills from 2013–2023 is approximately +12.3%.

Step 3: Comparison with Collar Strategy

From the previous analysis, the collar strategy provided a cumulative return of approximately +31% over the same period (2013–2023). Here’s how the two compare:

Strategy	Cumulative Return (2013–2023)	Risk Level
Collar Strategy	+31%	Moderate (limited downside)
T-Bills	+12.3%	Risk-free (no downside risk)

Step 4: Key Takeaways

Collar Strategy vs. T-Bills:
- The collar strategy outperformed T-bills over the last decade, providing +31% vs. +12.3%.
- However, the collar strategy involves market risk (albeit limited), while T-bills are risk-free.
Risk-Adjusted Returns:
- The collar strategy is a better option for investors willing to take on some risk in exchange for higher returns.
- T-bills are ideal for ultra-conservative investors who prioritize capital preservation over growth.
Inflation Consideration:
- Over the last decade, inflation averaged around 2% annually.
- T-bills barely kept pace with inflation, while the collar strategy provided real (inflation-adjusted) returns.
Market Conditions Matter:
- In a strong bull market (like 2013–2023), the collar strategy underperforms buy-and-hold but still beats T-bills.
- In a bear market or volatile period, the collar strategy’s downside protection would make it even more attractive compared to T-bills.

Final Thoughts

If you’re a risk-averse investor who wants to avoid market volatility entirely, T-bills are a safe choice, but they provide minimal returns that barely outpace inflation.
If you’re willing to accept some market risk in exchange for higher returns, the collar strategy is a better option, as it provides downside protection while still allowing for moderate growth.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your risk tolerance, investment goals, and time horizon. For retirees or conservative investors, a combination of both strategies (e.g., allocating a portion to T-bills and a portion to a collar strategy) might be a balanced approach.

Let’s walk through an example of how a $10,000 investment would have performed over the last 10 years (2013–2023) using:

The Collar Strategy
T-Bills

We’ll compare the final value of the investment under each strategy.

Assumptions

Collar Strategy:
- Annual return capped at +5% in up years.
- Losses limited to -5% in down years.
- Based on the S&P 500 (SPY) performance.
T-Bills:
- Annual returns based on historical 3-month T-bill rates.
- Returns are reinvested annually.
Initial Investment: $10,000.

Step 1: Collar Strategy Performance

Using the annual returns from the collar strategy (as calculated earlier):

Year	Collar Strategy Return	Investment Value at End of Year
2013	+5%	10,000×1.05=10,000×1.05=10,500
2014	+5%	10,500×1.05=10,500×1.05=11,025
2015	-0.7%	11,025×0.993=11,025×0.993=10,948
2016	+5%	10,948×1.05=10,948×1.05=11,495
2017	+5%	11,495×1.05=11,495×1.05=12,070
2018	-5%	12,070×0.95=12,070×0.95=11,467
2019	+5%	11,467×1.05=11,467×1.05=12,040
2020	+5%	12,040×1.05=12,040×1.05=12,642
2021	+5%	12,642×1.05=12,642×1.05=13,274
2022	-5%	13,274×0.95=13,274×0.95=12,610
2023	+5%	12,610×1.05=12,610×1.05=13,241

Final Value (Collar Strategy): $13,241

Step 2: T-Bill Performance

Using the historical 3-month T-bill rates, we calculate the annual growth of the $10,000 investment:

Year	T-Bill Rate	Investment Value at End of Year
2013	0.07%	10,000×1.0007=10,000×1.0007=10,007
2014	0.05%	10,007×1.0005=10,007×1.0005=10,012
2015	0.10%	10,012×1.0010=10,012×1.0010=10,022
2016	0.36%	10,022×1.0036=10,022×1.0036=10,058
2017	1.01%	10,058×1.0101=10,058×1.0101=10,160
2018	2.00%	10,160×1.0200=10,160×1.0200=10,363
2019	2.15%	10,363×1.0215=10,363×1.0215=10,586
2020	0.38%	10,586×1.0038=10,586×1.0038=10,626
2021	0.05%	10,626×1.0005=10,626×1.0005=10,631
2022	1.56%	10,631×1.0156=10,631×1.0156=10,797
2023	4.50%	10,797×1.0450=10,797×1.0450=11,283

Final Value (T-Bills): $11,283

Step 3: Comparison of Final Values

Strategy	Final Value (2013–2023)	Growth on $10,000
Collar Strategy	$13,241	+32.4%
T-Bills	$11,283	+12.8%

Key Takeaways

Collar Strategy:
- A 10,000investmentwouldhavegrownto∗∗10,000investmentwouldhavegrownto∗∗13,241** over 10 years.
- This represents a +32.4% return, with limited downside risk.
T-Bills:
- A 10,000investmentwouldhavegrownto∗∗10,000investmentwouldhavegrownto∗∗11,283** over 10 years.
- This represents a +12.8% return, with no risk of loss.
Difference:
- The collar strategy outperformed T-bills by $1,958 over 10 years.
- However, the collar strategy involves some market risk, while T-bills are risk-free.

Final Thoughts

If you’re a risk-averse investor who prioritizes safety and is okay with lower returns, T-bills are a good choice.
If you’re willing to accept some market risk in exchange for higher returns, the collar strategy is a better option.

For example:

If you had invested 10,000inthe∗∗collarstrategy∗∗,youwouldhave∗∗10,000inthe∗∗collarstrategy∗∗,youwouldhave∗∗13,241** after 10 years.
If you had invested 10,000in∗∗T−bills∗∗,youwouldhave∗∗10,000in∗∗T−bills∗∗,youwouldhave∗∗11,283** after 10 years.

The choice depends on your risk tolerance and investment goals. A balanced approach (e.g., splitting your investment between the two strategies) could also be a good option for some investors.

	Randolph Frodsham on Viral Burger King Worker Fired…
	April on Prosecuting Violations of the…
	Kansas Supreme Court… on MERS Is Dead: Can Be Sued For…
	frontncenter on NOMI PRINS…Foreclosure c…
	Yadullah westry on Robo-signers List

How to Use the Hedge Fund Income Strategy They Don’t Want You to Know

Generate 30–45% Annual Cash Flow Using the Same Structure as the Japanese Carry Trade

What Hedge Funds Know (That Retail Doesn’t)

The Simple Truth About Options Prices

The Long-Term Protection Is Cheap

Why This Works (The 6th Grade Version)

The Market Systematically Overprices Short-Term Volatility

Why This Is Not Speculation

The Spread Between What You Collect and What You Pay Is the Carry

This Is the Same Edge That Made the Japanese Carry Trade Profitable for Thirty Years

Hedge Funds Have Harvested This Edge Since the 1990s

Now You Can Too

Disclaimer

Prologue: The Secret the Hedge Funds Keep

Executive Summary (Read This First)

What Hedge Funds Discovered

Why Retail Investors Never Heard About It

The Problem It Solves

The Solution in One Sentence

How It Works (At a Glance)

Why SPY & QQQ Only

Real-World Income Examples (Illustrative)

$100,000 Portfolio

$250,000 Portfolio

$500,000 Portfolio

Expected Results (Not Promises)

What This Strategy Is NOT

Key Risks (Be Honest)

Who This Is For

Bottom Line

One-Week Trade Snapshot (Actual Structure)

Example Week: SPY & QQQ Income Cycle

Weekly Call Sales

What the Monthly Checks Look Like

Monthly Income Illustration (Per $100,000)

Why This Beats Dividend Portfolios (Blunt Version)

Stress Test: Income Through Market Crashes

2008 Financial Crisis

2020 COVID Crash

2022 Rate Shock Bear Market

What Happens If SPY Drops 25% in 90 Days (Step-by-Step)

Starting Point

Month 1: Initial Selloff (-8% to -10%)

Month 2: Acceleration (-15% to -20%)

Month 3: Capitulation (-25%)

Result at 90 Days:

The Psychological Difference

Table of Contents

PART ONE: FOUNDATION

Chapter 1: The Retirement Income Problem (And Why Bonds Fail)

The Promise That Broke

The Two Bad Options

What Retirees Actually Need

The Real Risk

The Answer They Won’t Give You

Chapter 2: Why Your Broker Will Not Recommend This

The Conversation Tom Had That Night

What Compliance Said

The Real Reason

This Chapter Exists Because of Tom

The Incentive Structure (Explained Plainly)

This Strategy Requires Work

Options Are Positioned as “Risky”

Compliance Departments Hate Complexity

The Industry Doesn’t Measure Success by Cash Flow

It Threatens the Retirement Drawdown Model

Your Advisor May Genuinely Not Know

What This Means for You

The Uncomfortable Truth

Chapter 3: The Case for SPY & QQQ Only

Chapter 4: What Is the Protected Wheel?

Chapter 4: What Is the Protected Wheel?

Chapter 5: Why Protection Changes Everything

Chapter 5: Why Protection Changes Everything

Chapter 6: Strategy Architecture: The Exact Mechanics

Chapter 6: Strategy Architecture: The Exact Mechanics

The Core Structure (No Modifications)

What Richard Learned: No Forecasting

The Exact Entry Checklist

The Weekly Execution Ritual