“Never sell” is a slogan. Sequence-of-returns risk, required minimum distributions, and a hospital bill still force sales. The honest version of the Yahoo/Moneywise list that matches this headline is: do not sell the ballast first, and do not sell a contractual benefit you have not read. If you need a distribution, take it from the sleeve designed for it.
The five items, as the source actually listed them
The article is “5 things US boomers should never sell in retirement — even if you really want to get rid of them,” on Yahoo Finance, a Moneywise piece. It is not a list of a primary residence, long-term care coverage, Social Security claiming, and dividend stocks — that was the Convert URL stub guessing. The five on the page are:
1. A diversified stock portfolio during a downturn. Fidelity, as cited there, warns that selling stocks early in retirement while markets are falling can permanently damage a portfolio. That is sequence-of-returns risk: withdrawals from a shrinking pile leave fewer assets to recover. The piece is explicit that this is not a defense of an undiversified speculative book or of more equity than you can sleep with. It is a warning against changing the long-term plan *because* prices fell.
2. A profitable rental because you are tired of being a landlord. Half of retirees received income from interest, dividends, or rentals in 2024, per the Federal Reserve citation in the article. Recurring rent that survives after tax, vacancy, and a property manager can beat a taxable sale followed by a 4% draw on a brokerage account. The same article says selling still makes sense if the property loses money, needs major capex, or is too much of the net worth in one ZIP code. Compare net rent to what the proceeds would earn *after* capital gains, depreciation recapture, and selling costs. Midnight leak calls are a management problem. They are not automatically a sell thesis.
3. All the gold you own. Taking profits when gold has become too large a sleeve is rational. Liquidating every ounce because the headline printed a round number is how you sell the one asset that, as Morningstar is cited for saying, can still act as a refuge in inflationary or volatile stretches. Gold pays no dividend. It can lose value. A modest allocation is the claim. A gold-IRA pitch wrapped around that claim is an ad. Skip the ad.
4. Highly appreciated assets intended for heirs. The article’s example: stock bought for $50,000, now worth $250,000, is a $200,000 taxable gain if you sell (before adjustments or exclusions). The IRS rule it cites: inherited assets generally get a basis step-up to fair market value at death, with exceptions. If the plan is to leave that lot to kids, selling it now to “simplify” is how you donate a slice to the Treasury that the kids would not have paid. California has no state step-up difference that saves you — federal basis is the one that matters — but California will tax the gain if *you* sell during life.
5. An annuity before checking its guarantees. FINRA, as cited, says variable annuities can carry surrender periods of eight years or longer. Cashing out inside that window triggers surrender charges; a 1035 exchange can forfeit living or death benefits. The article is not “keep every annuity forever.” Some contracts are expensive and wrong. The instruction is to read the guaranteed rate, surrender value, income rider, and tax hit before you sign the surrender form.
What the stub invented, and what California actually changes
The Convert URL draft listed a primary residence in a strong market, certain diversified accounts, long-term care coverage, Social Security claiming strategy, and dividend holdings. Those are a different article. Prop 13 *does* make a California primary residence a special case the Moneywise list barely touches: selling and buying another California house resets the assessed value. Aging in place is often the highest-return “asset” in this state because the tax basis stays low. That is a California fact, not a Moneywise bullet. RMDs still come due from IRAs regardless of what you “never sell.” Medicare IRMAA still taxes a clumsy IRA-to-cash year.
Community property and step-up at the first spouse’s death are the other California mechanics the national list skips. If the appreciated stock is community property, both halves can get a basis adjustment at the first death. That is a reason to *not* gift or sell the low-basis lot in a panic. Talk to a tax person who does California estates. This column is not that person.
Caveats
Moneywise pages are stuffed with affiliate modules — Vanguard Digital Advisor, Arrived rentals, Priority Gold, Willow, Annuity.org. Those are ads. The five-item frame and the Fidelity / Fed / IRS / FINRA citations are the article. “Never” does not survive a 40% drawdown in year two of retirement, a long-term care stay, or an RMD you cannot satisfy with dividends. Build a cash sleeve for the years you will actually spend. Sell from that sleeve. Leave the appreciated lot and the living-benefit rider until you have read the contract.
Educational commentary, not tax, legal, or investment advice.
Source: 5 things US boomers should never sell in retirement — even if you really want to get rid of them (Moneywise via Yahoo Finance).
The Hedge 