Boycotts Don’t Survive: Winners Take Chips, Not Votes

Listen to this article

Business is like the game of Poker

Spend an evening around a poker table and you will learn something about human nature that no survey will ever tell you: the loudest player is rarely the one winning. The man announcing every hand, protesting every ruling, and declaring what the room ought to do is usually the man whose stack is shrinking. The quiet player in the corner says almost nothing. He simply keeps collecting chips. Business has the same two kinds of noise, and confusing one for the other has cost owners fortunes — in both directions.

Every few months, it seems, some large company becomes the target of a boycott. The offense varies — a product decision, a political donation, an advertisement somebody disliked — but the ceremony is always the same. Statements are issued. Hashtags multiply. Commentators predict ruin on Monday, and by the end of the quarter the company’s sales are reported, and they have barely moved. Then, a year or two later, the same company makes a genuinely bad business decision — a product nobody wants, a price nobody will pay — and loses real money in silence, with no campaign against it at all. The contrast teaches the whole lesson: a business is not a democracy. Nobody’s ballot is counted. Only dollars are.

This is not cynicism. It is arithmetic. A boycott is a vote, and votes in the marketplace are cast at the register, one purchase at a time, by people who mostly never heard the speeches. The customer buying coffee or shoes or a pickup truck is thinking about price, convenience, habit, and whether the thing works. He may agree with the boycott’s arguments in the morning and still buy the product in the afternoon, because agreement costs nothing and switching costs something. Researchers have a dry phrase for this: a wide, reliable gap between what people say they will buy and what they actually buy. Any owner who forgets which side of that gap pays his rent is reading the applause instead of the table.

The poker version is exact. In a card room, respect is not awarded by acclamation. Nobody votes on who played the hand best. The chips move, and the chips are the entire record. A player can be the most popular man in the room, admired for his style and quoted for his opinions, and be broke by ten o’clock. Another can be disliked by half the table and own most of the money on it. The game is honest in a way politics is not: it pays on results, not on sentiment.

For the working owner, this cuts two ways, and both matter. The first way is comfort: if your business becomes a target — a bad review amplified, a local controversy, pressure to make a statement about something far from your trade — do not mistake the volume of the outrage for the size of the loss. Count what can be counted. Watch the register for a month before you watch the commentary for a day. Most storms pass over businesses that kept serving the customers who were actually buying.

The second way is a warning, and it is the sharper edge. The same arithmetic that protects you from boycotts destroys you for real failures, and it does so without any announcement at all. Customers who are merely dissatisfied rarely organize anything. They simply stop coming, one at a time, in silence, and there is no hashtag to warn you. The video stores and department stores of my lifetime were not voted out of existence. They were abandoned, purchase by purchase, by customers who found a better game and never said a word. A company can survive being hated loudly. It cannot survive being left quietly.

In my years practicing law and building houses, I watched clients make both errors. One would panic over a newspaper story and spend money answering critics who had never spent a dime with him. Another would ignore a slow leak of real customers because no one was complaining where he could hear it. The first man feared the vote. The second ignored the chips. Only one of those errors is survivable.

Here is the takeaway. Keep two ledgers in your business and never confuse them: the ledger of opinion — reviews, comments, campaigns, praise — and the ledger of money, which is the only one that settles accounts. Read the first for information and the second for truth. When trouble comes, ask the only question the table asks: are the people who buy from me still buying, and if they are leaving, where are they going? Winners at the Big Table are not the most approved of players in the room. They are the ones still holding chips when the noise dies down — and the noise always dies down.

Unknown's avatar

Author: timothymccandless

I have spent most of my professional life helping people who were being taken advantage of by systems they did not fully understand.

Leave a Reply