The Hedge | Brutal Honesty Over Hype Since 2008
HOA elections in California are governed by specific Davis-Stirling requirements designed to ensure that member voting is secret, fair, and verifiable. These requirements were enacted specifically because of widespread complaints about election manipulation in HOA communities. Understanding the correct election procedures — and recognizing when they’re violated — is essential for any homeowner who wants meaningful democratic participation in their association’s governance.
The Secret Ballot Requirement
California Civil Code Section 5120 requires that all HOA elections use a double-envelope secret ballot process. Members receive two envelopes: an outer envelope with the member’s identifying information and an inner envelope for the actual ballot. The member completes the ballot, seals it in the inner envelope, places the inner envelope in the outer envelope, signs the outer envelope, and returns it to the association. The inspector of elections opens outer envelopes first to verify membership, then opens inner envelopes to count votes — ensuring that votes cannot be traced to individual members. A board that counts votes itself without using this double-envelope process has violated the election procedures.
The Inspector of Elections Requirement
HOA elections must be conducted by an independent inspector of elections — not a board member, not a management company employee with a conflict, and not anyone who has a stake in the outcome. The inspector is responsible for: receiving and safeguarding ballots, verifying member eligibility, counting votes, reporting results, and retaining ballot materials for one year after the election. A board that appoints a conflicted inspector or counts votes itself has a compromised election that members can challenge.
Challenging a Defective Election
If you believe an HOA election was conducted improperly — improper notice, compromised inspector, failure to use secret ballot procedures — you can challenge it through: a written demand to the board identifying the procedural defects; IDR and ADR under Davis-Stirling; or a civil petition to the superior court to invalidate the election and order a new one. Courts have ordered HOA election do-overs when procedural violations were substantial. The one-year ballot retention requirement means evidence of election irregularities can be examined after the fact.
The Hedge has been cutting through financial and business noise since 2008. Brutal honesty over hype — always.
The Hedge 