Not All Dollars Are Taxed Alike

Listen to this article

The lessons we can learn from the game of Poker

At a poker table, chips are honest. A hundred-dollar chip is worth a hundred dollars in anyone’s stack, and the cage pays face value when you cash out. Retirement accounts break that rule. Two savers can hold statements showing identical balances — half a million dollars each — and own very different amounts of spendable money. The difference is not the market. It is the tax treatment of the accounts the money sits in, and it is the part of the count most people never make. It is as if some of your chips were printed in a currency that converts at eighty cents on the dollar, and nobody told you which ones.

The largest stack for most retirees is the tax-deferred one: the 401(k) and the traditional IRA. These accounts were a pleasure during the working years, because every contribution lowered that year’s tax bill. But the deduction was a deferral of the tax, not a forgiveness of it. Every dollar that comes out in retirement is taxed as ordinary income, and required minimum distributions eventually push money out whether you need it or not. A dollar in a traditional IRA is a dollar you share with the tax collector; his percentage just hasn’t been announced yet. At a combined tax rate of twenty percent, a $400,000 IRA holds roughly $320,000 of spendable money — and $80,000 that was never really yours.

The second stack is the tax-free one, principally the Roth accounts. Here the bargain runs in reverse. You paid tax on the money in the year you earned it and received no deduction, and in exchange the government agreed to leave the account alone from then on. Qualified withdrawals in retirement come out entirely tax-free — contributions and decades of growth alike — and there are no required distributions during the owner’s lifetime. A dollar in a Roth is the rarest thing in the tax code: a dollar that is wholly and finally yours.

The third stack is the ordinary taxable account: the brokerage account, the savings account, the certificates of deposit. This money was taxed before it went in and is taxed lightly along the way — interest and dividends each year, capital gains when you sell, usually at more favorable rates. It is also the most flexible money you own. No early-withdrawal penalties, no forced distributions, no tax ambush when you reach for it in an emergency. Flexibility is a form of value, and in the late game it counts.

This is not tidiness for its own sake. Retirement decisions get made on the spendable number, and the statement number lies politely. In my years practicing law, I sat with widows who believed they had a comfortable estate, only to learn that the big IRA at the center of it would be taxed on every withdrawal — and that pulling out a lump sum for a roof or a car could shove them into a higher bracket and produce the largest tax bill of their lives. They had not miscounted their balance. They had miscounted what their balance was worth to them.

Once the three stacks are visible, a retiree gains a lever most players never use: the order in which the stacks are spent. Drawing on taxable money while the Roth grows untouched, using the low-income years before required distributions begin to empty the tax-deferred stack at gentle rates — these are judgments that differ for every household and deserve an adviser’s eye. The Roth stack earns its keep in one more way: because its withdrawals do not count as income, they can fund a large expense — a car, a roof, a grandchild’s tuition — without pushing you into a higher bracket or increasing the share of your Social Security benefits that gets taxed. But strategy comes second. Sight comes first. You cannot play three stacks well while your count insists they are one.

Here is the takeaway. Redraw your one-page count with three columns — tax-deferred, tax-free, taxable — and beside the tax-deferred column, write your best estimate of your retirement tax rate and subtract that share. The total will be smaller than the one on your statements. It will also be true. And in the late game, a true smaller number beats a comfortable larger one every single time.

Unknown's avatar

Author: timothymccandless

I have spent most of my professional life helping people who were being taken advantage of by systems they did not fully understand.

Leave a Reply